Cargando…

Time-Frequency Distribution of Seismocardiographic Signals: A Comparative Study

Accurate estimation of seismocardiographic (SCG) signal features can help successful signal characterization and classification in health and disease. This may lead to new methods for diagnosing and monitoring heart function. Time-frequency distributions (TFD) were often used to estimate the spectro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taebi, Amirtaha, Mansy, Hansen A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28952511
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering4020032
_version_ 1783262545733222400
author Taebi, Amirtaha
Mansy, Hansen A.
author_facet Taebi, Amirtaha
Mansy, Hansen A.
author_sort Taebi, Amirtaha
collection PubMed
description Accurate estimation of seismocardiographic (SCG) signal features can help successful signal characterization and classification in health and disease. This may lead to new methods for diagnosing and monitoring heart function. Time-frequency distributions (TFD) were often used to estimate the spectrotemporal signal features. In this study, the performance of different TFDs (e.g., short-time Fourier transform (STFT), polynomial chirplet transform (PCT), and continuous wavelet transform (CWT) with different mother functions) was assessed using simulated signals, and then utilized to analyze actual SCGs. The instantaneous frequency (IF) was determined from TFD and the error in estimating IF was calculated for simulated signals. Results suggested that the lowest IF error depended on the TFD and the test signal. STFT had lower error than CWT methods for most test signals. For a simulated SCG, Morlet CWT more accurately estimated IF than other CWTs, but Morlet did not provide noticeable advantages over STFT or PCT. PCT had the most consistently accurate IF estimations and appeared more suited for estimating IF of actual SCG signals. PCT analysis showed that actual SCGs from eight healthy subjects had multiple spectral peaks at 9.20 ± 0.48, 25.84 ± 0.77, 50.71 ± 1.83 Hz (mean ± SEM). These may prove useful features for SCG characterization and classification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5590466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55904662017-09-21 Time-Frequency Distribution of Seismocardiographic Signals: A Comparative Study Taebi, Amirtaha Mansy, Hansen A. Bioengineering (Basel) Article Accurate estimation of seismocardiographic (SCG) signal features can help successful signal characterization and classification in health and disease. This may lead to new methods for diagnosing and monitoring heart function. Time-frequency distributions (TFD) were often used to estimate the spectrotemporal signal features. In this study, the performance of different TFDs (e.g., short-time Fourier transform (STFT), polynomial chirplet transform (PCT), and continuous wavelet transform (CWT) with different mother functions) was assessed using simulated signals, and then utilized to analyze actual SCGs. The instantaneous frequency (IF) was determined from TFD and the error in estimating IF was calculated for simulated signals. Results suggested that the lowest IF error depended on the TFD and the test signal. STFT had lower error than CWT methods for most test signals. For a simulated SCG, Morlet CWT more accurately estimated IF than other CWTs, but Morlet did not provide noticeable advantages over STFT or PCT. PCT had the most consistently accurate IF estimations and appeared more suited for estimating IF of actual SCG signals. PCT analysis showed that actual SCGs from eight healthy subjects had multiple spectral peaks at 9.20 ± 0.48, 25.84 ± 0.77, 50.71 ± 1.83 Hz (mean ± SEM). These may prove useful features for SCG characterization and classification. MDPI 2017-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5590466/ /pubmed/28952511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering4020032 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Taebi, Amirtaha
Mansy, Hansen A.
Time-Frequency Distribution of Seismocardiographic Signals: A Comparative Study
title Time-Frequency Distribution of Seismocardiographic Signals: A Comparative Study
title_full Time-Frequency Distribution of Seismocardiographic Signals: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Time-Frequency Distribution of Seismocardiographic Signals: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Time-Frequency Distribution of Seismocardiographic Signals: A Comparative Study
title_short Time-Frequency Distribution of Seismocardiographic Signals: A Comparative Study
title_sort time-frequency distribution of seismocardiographic signals: a comparative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28952511
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering4020032
work_keys_str_mv AT taebiamirtaha timefrequencydistributionofseismocardiographicsignalsacomparativestudy
AT mansyhansena timefrequencydistributionofseismocardiographicsignalsacomparativestudy