Cargando…

So, You Think You Have an Idea: A Practical Risk Reduction-Conceptual Model for Academic Translational Research

Translational research for new drugs, medical devices, and diagnostics encompasses aspects of both basic science and clinical research, requiring multidisciplinary skills and resources that are not all readily available in either a basic laboratory or clinical setting alone. We propose that, to be s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwartz, John, Macomber, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28952508
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering4020029
_version_ 1783262546450448384
author Schwartz, John
Macomber, Christopher
author_facet Schwartz, John
Macomber, Christopher
author_sort Schwartz, John
collection PubMed
description Translational research for new drugs, medical devices, and diagnostics encompasses aspects of both basic science and clinical research, requiring multidisciplinary skills and resources that are not all readily available in either a basic laboratory or clinical setting alone. We propose that, to be successful, “translational” research ought to be understood as a defined process from basic science through manufacturing, regulatory, clinical testing all the way to market. The authors outline a process which has worked well for them to identify and commercialize academic innovation. The academic environment places a high value on novelty and less value on whether, among other things, data are reproducible, scalable, reimbursable, or have commercial freedom to operate. In other words, when investors, strategic companies, or other later stage stakeholders evaluate academic efforts at translational research the relative lack of attention to clinical, regulatory, reimbursement, and manufacturing and intellectual property freedom to operate almost universally results in more questions and doubts about the potential of the proposed product, thereby inhibiting further interest. This contrasts with industry-based R&D, which often emphasizes manufacturing, regulatory and commercial factors. Academics do not so much choose to ignore those necessary and standard elements of translation development, but rather, they are not built into the culture or incentive structure of the university environment. Acknowledging and addressing this mismatch of approach and lack of common language in a systematic way facilitates a more effective “translation” handoffs of academic project concepts into meaningful clinical solutions help translational researchers more efficiently develop and progress new and better medical products which address validated needs. The authors provide an overview and framework for academic researchers to use which will help them define the elements of a market-driven translational program (1) problem identification and validation; (2) defining the conceptual model of disease; and (3) risk evaluation and mitigation strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5590469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55904692017-09-21 So, You Think You Have an Idea: A Practical Risk Reduction-Conceptual Model for Academic Translational Research Schwartz, John Macomber, Christopher Bioengineering (Basel) Review Translational research for new drugs, medical devices, and diagnostics encompasses aspects of both basic science and clinical research, requiring multidisciplinary skills and resources that are not all readily available in either a basic laboratory or clinical setting alone. We propose that, to be successful, “translational” research ought to be understood as a defined process from basic science through manufacturing, regulatory, clinical testing all the way to market. The authors outline a process which has worked well for them to identify and commercialize academic innovation. The academic environment places a high value on novelty and less value on whether, among other things, data are reproducible, scalable, reimbursable, or have commercial freedom to operate. In other words, when investors, strategic companies, or other later stage stakeholders evaluate academic efforts at translational research the relative lack of attention to clinical, regulatory, reimbursement, and manufacturing and intellectual property freedom to operate almost universally results in more questions and doubts about the potential of the proposed product, thereby inhibiting further interest. This contrasts with industry-based R&D, which often emphasizes manufacturing, regulatory and commercial factors. Academics do not so much choose to ignore those necessary and standard elements of translation development, but rather, they are not built into the culture or incentive structure of the university environment. Acknowledging and addressing this mismatch of approach and lack of common language in a systematic way facilitates a more effective “translation” handoffs of academic project concepts into meaningful clinical solutions help translational researchers more efficiently develop and progress new and better medical products which address validated needs. The authors provide an overview and framework for academic researchers to use which will help them define the elements of a market-driven translational program (1) problem identification and validation; (2) defining the conceptual model of disease; and (3) risk evaluation and mitigation strategies. MDPI 2017-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5590469/ /pubmed/28952508 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering4020029 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Schwartz, John
Macomber, Christopher
So, You Think You Have an Idea: A Practical Risk Reduction-Conceptual Model for Academic Translational Research
title So, You Think You Have an Idea: A Practical Risk Reduction-Conceptual Model for Academic Translational Research
title_full So, You Think You Have an Idea: A Practical Risk Reduction-Conceptual Model for Academic Translational Research
title_fullStr So, You Think You Have an Idea: A Practical Risk Reduction-Conceptual Model for Academic Translational Research
title_full_unstemmed So, You Think You Have an Idea: A Practical Risk Reduction-Conceptual Model for Academic Translational Research
title_short So, You Think You Have an Idea: A Practical Risk Reduction-Conceptual Model for Academic Translational Research
title_sort so, you think you have an idea: a practical risk reduction-conceptual model for academic translational research
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28952508
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering4020029
work_keys_str_mv AT schwartzjohn soyouthinkyouhaveanideaapracticalriskreductionconceptualmodelforacademictranslationalresearch
AT macomberchristopher soyouthinkyouhaveanideaapracticalriskreductionconceptualmodelforacademictranslationalresearch