Cargando…

Variation in the provision and practice of implant-based breast reconstruction in the UK: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of biological and synthetic meshes has revolutionised the practice of implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) but evidence for effectiveness is lacking. The iBRA (implant Breast Reconstruction evAluation) study is a national trainee-led project that aims to explore...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mylvaganam, Senthurun, Conroy, Elizabeth, Williamson, Paula R., Barnes, Nicola L.P., Cutress, Ramsey I., Gardiner, Matthew D., Jain, Abhilash, Skillman, Joanna M., Thrush, Steven, Whisker, Lisa J., Blazeby, Jane M., Potter, Shelley, Holcombe, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28768227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2017.07.016
_version_ 1783262567921090560
author Mylvaganam, Senthurun
Conroy, Elizabeth
Williamson, Paula R.
Barnes, Nicola L.P.
Cutress, Ramsey I.
Gardiner, Matthew D.
Jain, Abhilash
Skillman, Joanna M.
Thrush, Steven
Whisker, Lisa J.
Blazeby, Jane M.
Potter, Shelley
Holcombe, Christopher
author_facet Mylvaganam, Senthurun
Conroy, Elizabeth
Williamson, Paula R.
Barnes, Nicola L.P.
Cutress, Ramsey I.
Gardiner, Matthew D.
Jain, Abhilash
Skillman, Joanna M.
Thrush, Steven
Whisker, Lisa J.
Blazeby, Jane M.
Potter, Shelley
Holcombe, Christopher
author_sort Mylvaganam, Senthurun
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The introduction of biological and synthetic meshes has revolutionised the practice of implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) but evidence for effectiveness is lacking. The iBRA (implant Breast Reconstruction evAluation) study is a national trainee-led project that aims to explore the practice and outcomes of IBBR to inform the design of a future trial. We report the results of the iBRA National Practice Questionnaire (NPQ) which aimed to comprehensively describe the provision and practice of IBBR across the UK. METHODS: A questionnaire investigating local practice and service provision of IBBR developed by the iBRA Steering Group was completed by trainee and consultant leads at breast and plastic surgical units across the UK. Summary data for each survey item were calculated and variation between centres and overall provision of care examined. RESULTS: 81 units within 79 NHS-hospitals completed the questionnaire. Units offered a range of reconstructive techniques, with IBBR accounting for 70% (IQR:50–80%) of participating units' immediate procedures. Units on average were staffed by 2.5 breast surgeons (IQR:2.0–3.0) and 2.0 plastic surgeons (IQR:1.0–3.0) performing 35 IBBR cases per year (IQR:20-50). Variation was demonstrated in the provision of novel different techniques for IBBR especially the use of biological (n = 62) and synthetic (n = 25) meshes and in patient selection for these procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The iBRA-NPQ has demonstrated marked variation in the provision and practice of IBBR in the UK. The prospective audit phase of the iBRA study will determine the safety and effectiveness of different approaches to IBBR and allow evidence-based best practice to be explored.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5590633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55906332017-10-01 Variation in the provision and practice of implant-based breast reconstruction in the UK: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire Mylvaganam, Senthurun Conroy, Elizabeth Williamson, Paula R. Barnes, Nicola L.P. Cutress, Ramsey I. Gardiner, Matthew D. Jain, Abhilash Skillman, Joanna M. Thrush, Steven Whisker, Lisa J. Blazeby, Jane M. Potter, Shelley Holcombe, Christopher Breast Original Article INTRODUCTION: The introduction of biological and synthetic meshes has revolutionised the practice of implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) but evidence for effectiveness is lacking. The iBRA (implant Breast Reconstruction evAluation) study is a national trainee-led project that aims to explore the practice and outcomes of IBBR to inform the design of a future trial. We report the results of the iBRA National Practice Questionnaire (NPQ) which aimed to comprehensively describe the provision and practice of IBBR across the UK. METHODS: A questionnaire investigating local practice and service provision of IBBR developed by the iBRA Steering Group was completed by trainee and consultant leads at breast and plastic surgical units across the UK. Summary data for each survey item were calculated and variation between centres and overall provision of care examined. RESULTS: 81 units within 79 NHS-hospitals completed the questionnaire. Units offered a range of reconstructive techniques, with IBBR accounting for 70% (IQR:50–80%) of participating units' immediate procedures. Units on average were staffed by 2.5 breast surgeons (IQR:2.0–3.0) and 2.0 plastic surgeons (IQR:1.0–3.0) performing 35 IBBR cases per year (IQR:20-50). Variation was demonstrated in the provision of novel different techniques for IBBR especially the use of biological (n = 62) and synthetic (n = 25) meshes and in patient selection for these procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The iBRA-NPQ has demonstrated marked variation in the provision and practice of IBBR in the UK. The prospective audit phase of the iBRA study will determine the safety and effectiveness of different approaches to IBBR and allow evidence-based best practice to be explored. Elsevier 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5590633/ /pubmed/28768227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2017.07.016 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Mylvaganam, Senthurun
Conroy, Elizabeth
Williamson, Paula R.
Barnes, Nicola L.P.
Cutress, Ramsey I.
Gardiner, Matthew D.
Jain, Abhilash
Skillman, Joanna M.
Thrush, Steven
Whisker, Lisa J.
Blazeby, Jane M.
Potter, Shelley
Holcombe, Christopher
Variation in the provision and practice of implant-based breast reconstruction in the UK: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire
title Variation in the provision and practice of implant-based breast reconstruction in the UK: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire
title_full Variation in the provision and practice of implant-based breast reconstruction in the UK: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire
title_fullStr Variation in the provision and practice of implant-based breast reconstruction in the UK: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Variation in the provision and practice of implant-based breast reconstruction in the UK: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire
title_short Variation in the provision and practice of implant-based breast reconstruction in the UK: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire
title_sort variation in the provision and practice of implant-based breast reconstruction in the uk: results from the ibra national practice questionnaire
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28768227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2017.07.016
work_keys_str_mv AT mylvaganamsenthurun variationintheprovisionandpracticeofimplantbasedbreastreconstructionintheukresultsfromtheibranationalpracticequestionnaire
AT conroyelizabeth variationintheprovisionandpracticeofimplantbasedbreastreconstructionintheukresultsfromtheibranationalpracticequestionnaire
AT williamsonpaular variationintheprovisionandpracticeofimplantbasedbreastreconstructionintheukresultsfromtheibranationalpracticequestionnaire
AT barnesnicolalp variationintheprovisionandpracticeofimplantbasedbreastreconstructionintheukresultsfromtheibranationalpracticequestionnaire
AT cutressramseyi variationintheprovisionandpracticeofimplantbasedbreastreconstructionintheukresultsfromtheibranationalpracticequestionnaire
AT gardinermatthewd variationintheprovisionandpracticeofimplantbasedbreastreconstructionintheukresultsfromtheibranationalpracticequestionnaire
AT jainabhilash variationintheprovisionandpracticeofimplantbasedbreastreconstructionintheukresultsfromtheibranationalpracticequestionnaire
AT skillmanjoannam variationintheprovisionandpracticeofimplantbasedbreastreconstructionintheukresultsfromtheibranationalpracticequestionnaire
AT thrushsteven variationintheprovisionandpracticeofimplantbasedbreastreconstructionintheukresultsfromtheibranationalpracticequestionnaire
AT whiskerlisaj variationintheprovisionandpracticeofimplantbasedbreastreconstructionintheukresultsfromtheibranationalpracticequestionnaire
AT blazebyjanem variationintheprovisionandpracticeofimplantbasedbreastreconstructionintheukresultsfromtheibranationalpracticequestionnaire
AT pottershelley variationintheprovisionandpracticeofimplantbasedbreastreconstructionintheukresultsfromtheibranationalpracticequestionnaire
AT holcombechristopher variationintheprovisionandpracticeofimplantbasedbreastreconstructionintheukresultsfromtheibranationalpracticequestionnaire
AT variationintheprovisionandpracticeofimplantbasedbreastreconstructionintheukresultsfromtheibranationalpracticequestionnaire
AT variationintheprovisionandpracticeofimplantbasedbreastreconstructionintheukresultsfromtheibranationalpracticequestionnaire