Cargando…

Quality improvement regarding handoff

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have emphasized the importance of effectual communication during patient handoffs. The objectives of this study were to (1) implement a resident-driven quality improvement project to improve handoffs by including key elements that are necessary for a safe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Studeny, Scott, Burley, Lauren, Cowen, Kelsey, Akers, Melanie, O’Neill, Kelly, Flesher, Susan L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28912950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312117729098
_version_ 1783262570775314432
author Studeny, Scott
Burley, Lauren
Cowen, Kelsey
Akers, Melanie
O’Neill, Kelly
Flesher, Susan L
author_facet Studeny, Scott
Burley, Lauren
Cowen, Kelsey
Akers, Melanie
O’Neill, Kelly
Flesher, Susan L
author_sort Studeny, Scott
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have emphasized the importance of effectual communication during patient handoffs. The objectives of this study were to (1) implement a resident-driven quality improvement project to improve handoffs by including key elements that are necessary for a safe and effective handoff. We chose to use the IPASS (illness severity, patient summary, action items, situation awareness and contingency planning, synthesis by receiver) mnemonic as our standardized handoff model; (2) Consider balancing measures in an effort to be aware of any negative effects of our interventions on resident satisfaction with the system. METHODS: A senior resident established a quality improvement team which developed an AIM statement (a written, measurable, and time-sensitive description of the goal of a quality improvement team) and key drivers. A survey was administered to residents regarding their opinions about the handoff process. Tracking of whether or not handoffs included the component IPASS elements was performed over an 11-month period. During this time frame, three Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were conducted. The first was an educational series involving lecture and role playing. The second was printed cards listing appropriate handoff elements. Intervention three was development of a tool and method to decrease nurse interruptions during handoff. RESULTS: Inclusion of six key elements of handoffs improved as follows. Illness severity improved from 5% to 97%, diagnosis from 60% to 100%, patient summary from 71% to 100%, contingency planning from 10% to 100%, action list from 23% to 100%, and receiver synthesis from 0% to 97%. Balancing measures showed the residents were more satisfied with the new system and found it to be more effective at providing a safe transition of care. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a resident-driven multidisciplinary IPASS handoff system resulted in improved inclusion of key handoff elements and increased resident satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5590690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55906902017-09-14 Quality improvement regarding handoff Studeny, Scott Burley, Lauren Cowen, Kelsey Akers, Melanie O’Neill, Kelly Flesher, Susan L SAGE Open Med Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have emphasized the importance of effectual communication during patient handoffs. The objectives of this study were to (1) implement a resident-driven quality improvement project to improve handoffs by including key elements that are necessary for a safe and effective handoff. We chose to use the IPASS (illness severity, patient summary, action items, situation awareness and contingency planning, synthesis by receiver) mnemonic as our standardized handoff model; (2) Consider balancing measures in an effort to be aware of any negative effects of our interventions on resident satisfaction with the system. METHODS: A senior resident established a quality improvement team which developed an AIM statement (a written, measurable, and time-sensitive description of the goal of a quality improvement team) and key drivers. A survey was administered to residents regarding their opinions about the handoff process. Tracking of whether or not handoffs included the component IPASS elements was performed over an 11-month period. During this time frame, three Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were conducted. The first was an educational series involving lecture and role playing. The second was printed cards listing appropriate handoff elements. Intervention three was development of a tool and method to decrease nurse interruptions during handoff. RESULTS: Inclusion of six key elements of handoffs improved as follows. Illness severity improved from 5% to 97%, diagnosis from 60% to 100%, patient summary from 71% to 100%, contingency planning from 10% to 100%, action list from 23% to 100%, and receiver synthesis from 0% to 97%. Balancing measures showed the residents were more satisfied with the new system and found it to be more effective at providing a safe transition of care. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a resident-driven multidisciplinary IPASS handoff system resulted in improved inclusion of key handoff elements and increased resident satisfaction. SAGE Publications 2017-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5590690/ /pubmed/28912950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312117729098 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Studeny, Scott
Burley, Lauren
Cowen, Kelsey
Akers, Melanie
O’Neill, Kelly
Flesher, Susan L
Quality improvement regarding handoff
title Quality improvement regarding handoff
title_full Quality improvement regarding handoff
title_fullStr Quality improvement regarding handoff
title_full_unstemmed Quality improvement regarding handoff
title_short Quality improvement regarding handoff
title_sort quality improvement regarding handoff
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28912950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312117729098
work_keys_str_mv AT studenyscott qualityimprovementregardinghandoff
AT burleylauren qualityimprovementregardinghandoff
AT cowenkelsey qualityimprovementregardinghandoff
AT akersmelanie qualityimprovementregardinghandoff
AT oneillkelly qualityimprovementregardinghandoff
AT fleshersusanl qualityimprovementregardinghandoff