Cargando…

A comparison between the administration of oral prolonged-release oxycodone-naloxone and transdermal fentanyl in patients with moderate-to-severe cancer pain: a propensity score analysis

BACKGROUND: Opioids are the most important pharmacological treatment for moderate-to-severe cancer pain, but side effects limit their use. Transdermal fentanyl (TDF) and oral prolonged-release oxycodone-naloxone (OXN-PR) are effective in controlling chronic pain, with less constipation compared to o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberto, A, Greco, MT, Legramandi, L, Galli, F, Galli, M, Corli, O
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28919810
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S141928
_version_ 1783262582394585088
author Roberto, A
Greco, MT
Legramandi, L
Galli, F
Galli, M
Corli, O
author_facet Roberto, A
Greco, MT
Legramandi, L
Galli, F
Galli, M
Corli, O
author_sort Roberto, A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Opioids are the most important pharmacological treatment for moderate-to-severe cancer pain, but side effects limit their use. Transdermal fentanyl (TDF) and oral prolonged-release oxycodone-naloxone (OXN-PR) are effective in controlling chronic pain, with less constipation compared to other opioids. However, TDF and OXN-PR have never been directly compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cancer patients with moderate-to-severe chronic pain were consecutively enrolled in two prospective 28-day trials, received either TDF or OXN-PR, and were assessed at baseline and after 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. The primary endpoint was 28-day analgesic response rate (average pain intensity decrease ≥30% from baseline). Other outcome measures included opioid daily dose changes over time; need for adjuvant analgesics; number of switches; premature discontinuation; presence and severity of constipation; and other adverse drug reactions. To compare the efficacy and the safety of TDF and OXN-PR, we used the propensity score analysis to adjust for heterogeneity between the two patient groups. RESULTS: Three hundred ten out of 336 patients originally treated (119 TDF and 191 OXN-PR) were included in the comparative analysis. The amount of responders was comparable after TDF (75.3%) and OXN-PR administration (82.9%, not significant [NS]). The final opioid daily dose expressed as morphine equivalent was 113.6 mg for TDF and 44.5 mg for OXN-PR (p<0.0001). A daily opioid dose escalation >5% was less common after OXN-PR (19.3%) than after TDS administration (37.9%, p<0.0001). Opioid switches and discontinuation were similar in both groups. Severe constipation in the two groups was comparable (32.6% after TDF vs 24.7% after OXN-PR, NS). Nausea, vomiting, and dry mouth were significantly less frequent in the OXN-PR group than in the TDF group. CONCLUSION: Despite a similar analgesic activity in moderate-to-severe cancer pain, OXN-PR is characterized by lower daily dosages, less need for drug escalation, and fewer side effects compared to TDF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5590764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55907642017-09-15 A comparison between the administration of oral prolonged-release oxycodone-naloxone and transdermal fentanyl in patients with moderate-to-severe cancer pain: a propensity score analysis Roberto, A Greco, MT Legramandi, L Galli, F Galli, M Corli, O J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Opioids are the most important pharmacological treatment for moderate-to-severe cancer pain, but side effects limit their use. Transdermal fentanyl (TDF) and oral prolonged-release oxycodone-naloxone (OXN-PR) are effective in controlling chronic pain, with less constipation compared to other opioids. However, TDF and OXN-PR have never been directly compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cancer patients with moderate-to-severe chronic pain were consecutively enrolled in two prospective 28-day trials, received either TDF or OXN-PR, and were assessed at baseline and after 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. The primary endpoint was 28-day analgesic response rate (average pain intensity decrease ≥30% from baseline). Other outcome measures included opioid daily dose changes over time; need for adjuvant analgesics; number of switches; premature discontinuation; presence and severity of constipation; and other adverse drug reactions. To compare the efficacy and the safety of TDF and OXN-PR, we used the propensity score analysis to adjust for heterogeneity between the two patient groups. RESULTS: Three hundred ten out of 336 patients originally treated (119 TDF and 191 OXN-PR) were included in the comparative analysis. The amount of responders was comparable after TDF (75.3%) and OXN-PR administration (82.9%, not significant [NS]). The final opioid daily dose expressed as morphine equivalent was 113.6 mg for TDF and 44.5 mg for OXN-PR (p<0.0001). A daily opioid dose escalation >5% was less common after OXN-PR (19.3%) than after TDS administration (37.9%, p<0.0001). Opioid switches and discontinuation were similar in both groups. Severe constipation in the two groups was comparable (32.6% after TDF vs 24.7% after OXN-PR, NS). Nausea, vomiting, and dry mouth were significantly less frequent in the OXN-PR group than in the TDF group. CONCLUSION: Despite a similar analgesic activity in moderate-to-severe cancer pain, OXN-PR is characterized by lower daily dosages, less need for drug escalation, and fewer side effects compared to TDF. Dove Medical Press 2017-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5590764/ /pubmed/28919810 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S141928 Text en © 2017 Roberto et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Roberto, A
Greco, MT
Legramandi, L
Galli, F
Galli, M
Corli, O
A comparison between the administration of oral prolonged-release oxycodone-naloxone and transdermal fentanyl in patients with moderate-to-severe cancer pain: a propensity score analysis
title A comparison between the administration of oral prolonged-release oxycodone-naloxone and transdermal fentanyl in patients with moderate-to-severe cancer pain: a propensity score analysis
title_full A comparison between the administration of oral prolonged-release oxycodone-naloxone and transdermal fentanyl in patients with moderate-to-severe cancer pain: a propensity score analysis
title_fullStr A comparison between the administration of oral prolonged-release oxycodone-naloxone and transdermal fentanyl in patients with moderate-to-severe cancer pain: a propensity score analysis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between the administration of oral prolonged-release oxycodone-naloxone and transdermal fentanyl in patients with moderate-to-severe cancer pain: a propensity score analysis
title_short A comparison between the administration of oral prolonged-release oxycodone-naloxone and transdermal fentanyl in patients with moderate-to-severe cancer pain: a propensity score analysis
title_sort comparison between the administration of oral prolonged-release oxycodone-naloxone and transdermal fentanyl in patients with moderate-to-severe cancer pain: a propensity score analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28919810
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S141928
work_keys_str_mv AT robertoa acomparisonbetweentheadministrationoforalprolongedreleaseoxycodonenaloxoneandtransdermalfentanylinpatientswithmoderatetoseverecancerpainapropensityscoreanalysis
AT grecomt acomparisonbetweentheadministrationoforalprolongedreleaseoxycodonenaloxoneandtransdermalfentanylinpatientswithmoderatetoseverecancerpainapropensityscoreanalysis
AT legramandil acomparisonbetweentheadministrationoforalprolongedreleaseoxycodonenaloxoneandtransdermalfentanylinpatientswithmoderatetoseverecancerpainapropensityscoreanalysis
AT gallif acomparisonbetweentheadministrationoforalprolongedreleaseoxycodonenaloxoneandtransdermalfentanylinpatientswithmoderatetoseverecancerpainapropensityscoreanalysis
AT gallim acomparisonbetweentheadministrationoforalprolongedreleaseoxycodonenaloxoneandtransdermalfentanylinpatientswithmoderatetoseverecancerpainapropensityscoreanalysis
AT corlio acomparisonbetweentheadministrationoforalprolongedreleaseoxycodonenaloxoneandtransdermalfentanylinpatientswithmoderatetoseverecancerpainapropensityscoreanalysis
AT robertoa comparisonbetweentheadministrationoforalprolongedreleaseoxycodonenaloxoneandtransdermalfentanylinpatientswithmoderatetoseverecancerpainapropensityscoreanalysis
AT grecomt comparisonbetweentheadministrationoforalprolongedreleaseoxycodonenaloxoneandtransdermalfentanylinpatientswithmoderatetoseverecancerpainapropensityscoreanalysis
AT legramandil comparisonbetweentheadministrationoforalprolongedreleaseoxycodonenaloxoneandtransdermalfentanylinpatientswithmoderatetoseverecancerpainapropensityscoreanalysis
AT gallif comparisonbetweentheadministrationoforalprolongedreleaseoxycodonenaloxoneandtransdermalfentanylinpatientswithmoderatetoseverecancerpainapropensityscoreanalysis
AT gallim comparisonbetweentheadministrationoforalprolongedreleaseoxycodonenaloxoneandtransdermalfentanylinpatientswithmoderatetoseverecancerpainapropensityscoreanalysis
AT corlio comparisonbetweentheadministrationoforalprolongedreleaseoxycodonenaloxoneandtransdermalfentanylinpatientswithmoderatetoseverecancerpainapropensityscoreanalysis