Cargando…

Factors Affecting Length of Stay Following Elective Anterior and Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery

Background Disease of the cervical spine is widely prevalent, most commonly secondary to degenerative disc changes and spondylosis. Objective The goal of the paper was to identify a possible discrepancy regarding the length of stay (LOS) between the anterior and posterior approaches to elective cerv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuk, Frank J, Maniya, Akbar Y, Rasouli, Jonathan J, Dessy, Alexa M, McCormick, Patrick J, Choudhri, Tanvir F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28929036
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1452
_version_ 1783262585224691712
author Yuk, Frank J
Maniya, Akbar Y
Rasouli, Jonathan J
Dessy, Alexa M
McCormick, Patrick J
Choudhri, Tanvir F
author_facet Yuk, Frank J
Maniya, Akbar Y
Rasouli, Jonathan J
Dessy, Alexa M
McCormick, Patrick J
Choudhri, Tanvir F
author_sort Yuk, Frank J
collection PubMed
description Background Disease of the cervical spine is widely prevalent, most commonly secondary to degenerative disc changes and spondylosis. Objective The goal of the paper was to identify a possible discrepancy regarding the length of stay (LOS) between the anterior and posterior approaches to elective cervical spine surgery and identify contributing factors. Methods A retrospective study was performed on 587 patients (341 anterior, 246 posterior) that underwent elective cervical spinal surgery between October 2001 and March 2014. Pre- and intraoperative data were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA) and the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY). Results Average LOS was 3.21 ± 0.32 days for patients that benefited from the anterior approach cervical spinal surgery and 5.28 ± 0.37 days for patients that benefited from the posterior approach surgery, P-value < 0.0001. Anterior patients had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (2.43 ± 0.036 vs. 2.70 ± 0.044). Anterior patients also had fewer intervertebral levels operated upon (2.18 ± 0.056 vs. 4.11 ± 0.13), shorter incisions (5.49 ± 0.093 cm vs. 9.25 ± 0.16 cm), lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (183.8 ± 9.0 cc vs. 340.0 ± 8.7 cc), and shorter procedure times (4.12 ± 0.09 hours vs. 4.47 ± 0.10 hours). Chi-squared tests for hypertension, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and asthma showed no significant difference between groups. Conclusions: Patients with anterior surgery performed experienced a length of stay that was 2.07 days shorter on average. Higher EBL, longer incisions, more intervertebral levels, and longer operating time were significantly associated with the posterior approach. Future studies should include multiple surgeons. The goal would be to create a model that could accurately predict the postoperative length of stay based on patient and operative factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5590777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55907772017-09-19 Factors Affecting Length of Stay Following Elective Anterior and Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery Yuk, Frank J Maniya, Akbar Y Rasouli, Jonathan J Dessy, Alexa M McCormick, Patrick J Choudhri, Tanvir F Cureus Orthopedics Background Disease of the cervical spine is widely prevalent, most commonly secondary to degenerative disc changes and spondylosis. Objective The goal of the paper was to identify a possible discrepancy regarding the length of stay (LOS) between the anterior and posterior approaches to elective cervical spine surgery and identify contributing factors. Methods A retrospective study was performed on 587 patients (341 anterior, 246 posterior) that underwent elective cervical spinal surgery between October 2001 and March 2014. Pre- and intraoperative data were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA) and the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY). Results Average LOS was 3.21 ± 0.32 days for patients that benefited from the anterior approach cervical spinal surgery and 5.28 ± 0.37 days for patients that benefited from the posterior approach surgery, P-value < 0.0001. Anterior patients had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (2.43 ± 0.036 vs. 2.70 ± 0.044). Anterior patients also had fewer intervertebral levels operated upon (2.18 ± 0.056 vs. 4.11 ± 0.13), shorter incisions (5.49 ± 0.093 cm vs. 9.25 ± 0.16 cm), lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (183.8 ± 9.0 cc vs. 340.0 ± 8.7 cc), and shorter procedure times (4.12 ± 0.09 hours vs. 4.47 ± 0.10 hours). Chi-squared tests for hypertension, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and asthma showed no significant difference between groups. Conclusions: Patients with anterior surgery performed experienced a length of stay that was 2.07 days shorter on average. Higher EBL, longer incisions, more intervertebral levels, and longer operating time were significantly associated with the posterior approach. Future studies should include multiple surgeons. The goal would be to create a model that could accurately predict the postoperative length of stay based on patient and operative factors. Cureus 2017-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5590777/ /pubmed/28929036 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1452 Text en Copyright © 2017, Yuk et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Yuk, Frank J
Maniya, Akbar Y
Rasouli, Jonathan J
Dessy, Alexa M
McCormick, Patrick J
Choudhri, Tanvir F
Factors Affecting Length of Stay Following Elective Anterior and Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery
title Factors Affecting Length of Stay Following Elective Anterior and Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery
title_full Factors Affecting Length of Stay Following Elective Anterior and Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery
title_fullStr Factors Affecting Length of Stay Following Elective Anterior and Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Factors Affecting Length of Stay Following Elective Anterior and Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery
title_short Factors Affecting Length of Stay Following Elective Anterior and Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery
title_sort factors affecting length of stay following elective anterior and posterior cervical spine surgery
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28929036
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1452
work_keys_str_mv AT yukfrankj factorsaffectinglengthofstayfollowingelectiveanteriorandposteriorcervicalspinesurgery
AT maniyaakbary factorsaffectinglengthofstayfollowingelectiveanteriorandposteriorcervicalspinesurgery
AT rasoulijonathanj factorsaffectinglengthofstayfollowingelectiveanteriorandposteriorcervicalspinesurgery
AT dessyalexam factorsaffectinglengthofstayfollowingelectiveanteriorandposteriorcervicalspinesurgery
AT mccormickpatrickj factorsaffectinglengthofstayfollowingelectiveanteriorandposteriorcervicalspinesurgery
AT choudhritanvirf factorsaffectinglengthofstayfollowingelectiveanteriorandposteriorcervicalspinesurgery