Cargando…
The potential role of genetic assimilation during maize domestication
Domestication research has largely focused on identification of morphological and genetic differences between extant populations of crops and their wild relatives. Little attention has been paid to the potential effects of environment despite substantial known changes in climate from the time of dom...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28886108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184202 |
_version_ | 1783262609523343360 |
---|---|
author | Lorant, Anne Pedersen, Sarah Holst, Irene Hufford, Matthew B. Winter, Klaus Piperno, Dolores Ross-Ibarra, Jeffrey |
author_facet | Lorant, Anne Pedersen, Sarah Holst, Irene Hufford, Matthew B. Winter, Klaus Piperno, Dolores Ross-Ibarra, Jeffrey |
author_sort | Lorant, Anne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Domestication research has largely focused on identification of morphological and genetic differences between extant populations of crops and their wild relatives. Little attention has been paid to the potential effects of environment despite substantial known changes in climate from the time of domestication to modern day. In recent research, the exposure of teosinte (i.e., wild maize) to environments similar to the time of domestication, resulted in a plastic induction of domesticated phenotypes in teosinte. These results suggest that early agriculturalists may have selected for genetic mechanisms that cemented domestication phenotypes initially induced by a plastic response of teosinte to environment, a process known as genetic assimilation. To better understand this phenomenon and the potential role of environment in maize domestication, we examined differential gene expression in maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) and teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis) between past and present conditions. We identified a gene set of over 2000 loci showing a change in expression across environmental conditions in teosinte and invariance in maize. In fact, overall we observed both greater plasticity in gene expression and more substantial changes in co-expressionnal networks in teosinte across environments when compared to maize. While these results suggest genetic assimilation played at least some role in domestication, genes showing expression patterns consistent with assimilation are not significantly enriched for previously identified domestication candidates, indicating assimilation did not have a genome-wide effect. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5590903 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55909032017-09-15 The potential role of genetic assimilation during maize domestication Lorant, Anne Pedersen, Sarah Holst, Irene Hufford, Matthew B. Winter, Klaus Piperno, Dolores Ross-Ibarra, Jeffrey PLoS One Research Article Domestication research has largely focused on identification of morphological and genetic differences between extant populations of crops and their wild relatives. Little attention has been paid to the potential effects of environment despite substantial known changes in climate from the time of domestication to modern day. In recent research, the exposure of teosinte (i.e., wild maize) to environments similar to the time of domestication, resulted in a plastic induction of domesticated phenotypes in teosinte. These results suggest that early agriculturalists may have selected for genetic mechanisms that cemented domestication phenotypes initially induced by a plastic response of teosinte to environment, a process known as genetic assimilation. To better understand this phenomenon and the potential role of environment in maize domestication, we examined differential gene expression in maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) and teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis) between past and present conditions. We identified a gene set of over 2000 loci showing a change in expression across environmental conditions in teosinte and invariance in maize. In fact, overall we observed both greater plasticity in gene expression and more substantial changes in co-expressionnal networks in teosinte across environments when compared to maize. While these results suggest genetic assimilation played at least some role in domestication, genes showing expression patterns consistent with assimilation are not significantly enriched for previously identified domestication candidates, indicating assimilation did not have a genome-wide effect. Public Library of Science 2017-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5590903/ /pubmed/28886108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184202 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lorant, Anne Pedersen, Sarah Holst, Irene Hufford, Matthew B. Winter, Klaus Piperno, Dolores Ross-Ibarra, Jeffrey The potential role of genetic assimilation during maize domestication |
title | The potential role of genetic assimilation during maize domestication |
title_full | The potential role of genetic assimilation during maize domestication |
title_fullStr | The potential role of genetic assimilation during maize domestication |
title_full_unstemmed | The potential role of genetic assimilation during maize domestication |
title_short | The potential role of genetic assimilation during maize domestication |
title_sort | potential role of genetic assimilation during maize domestication |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28886108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184202 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lorantanne thepotentialroleofgeneticassimilationduringmaizedomestication AT pedersensarah thepotentialroleofgeneticassimilationduringmaizedomestication AT holstirene thepotentialroleofgeneticassimilationduringmaizedomestication AT huffordmatthewb thepotentialroleofgeneticassimilationduringmaizedomestication AT winterklaus thepotentialroleofgeneticassimilationduringmaizedomestication AT pipernodolores thepotentialroleofgeneticassimilationduringmaizedomestication AT rossibarrajeffrey thepotentialroleofgeneticassimilationduringmaizedomestication AT lorantanne potentialroleofgeneticassimilationduringmaizedomestication AT pedersensarah potentialroleofgeneticassimilationduringmaizedomestication AT holstirene potentialroleofgeneticassimilationduringmaizedomestication AT huffordmatthewb potentialroleofgeneticassimilationduringmaizedomestication AT winterklaus potentialroleofgeneticassimilationduringmaizedomestication AT pipernodolores potentialroleofgeneticassimilationduringmaizedomestication AT rossibarrajeffrey potentialroleofgeneticassimilationduringmaizedomestication |