Cargando…

On the consistency of seismically imaged lower mantle slabs

The geoscience community is increasingly utilizing seismic tomography to interpret mantle heterogeneity and its links to past tectonic and geodynamic processes. To assess the robustness and distribution of positive seismic anomalies, inferred as subducted slabs, we create a set of vote maps for the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shephard, G. E., Matthews, K. J., Hosseini, K., Domeier, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5591187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28887461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11039-w
_version_ 1783262659776348160
author Shephard, G. E.
Matthews, K. J.
Hosseini, K.
Domeier, M.
author_facet Shephard, G. E.
Matthews, K. J.
Hosseini, K.
Domeier, M.
author_sort Shephard, G. E.
collection PubMed
description The geoscience community is increasingly utilizing seismic tomography to interpret mantle heterogeneity and its links to past tectonic and geodynamic processes. To assess the robustness and distribution of positive seismic anomalies, inferred as subducted slabs, we create a set of vote maps for the lower mantle with 14 global P-wave or S-wave tomography models. Based on a depth-dependent threshold metric, an average of 20% of any given tomography model depth is identified as a potential slab. However, upon combining the 14 models, the most consistent positive wavespeed features are identified by an increasing vote count. An overall peak in the most robust anomalies is found between 1000–1400 km depth, followed by a decline to a minimum around 2000 km. While this trend could reflect reduced tomographic resolution in the middle mantle, we show that it may alternatively relate to real changes in the time-dependent subduction flux and/or a mid-lower mantle viscosity increase. An apparent secondary peak in agreement below 2500 km depth may reflect the degree-two lower mantle slow seismic structures. Vote maps illustrate the potential shortcomings of using a limited number or type of tomography models and slab threshold criteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5591187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55911872017-09-13 On the consistency of seismically imaged lower mantle slabs Shephard, G. E. Matthews, K. J. Hosseini, K. Domeier, M. Sci Rep Article The geoscience community is increasingly utilizing seismic tomography to interpret mantle heterogeneity and its links to past tectonic and geodynamic processes. To assess the robustness and distribution of positive seismic anomalies, inferred as subducted slabs, we create a set of vote maps for the lower mantle with 14 global P-wave or S-wave tomography models. Based on a depth-dependent threshold metric, an average of 20% of any given tomography model depth is identified as a potential slab. However, upon combining the 14 models, the most consistent positive wavespeed features are identified by an increasing vote count. An overall peak in the most robust anomalies is found between 1000–1400 km depth, followed by a decline to a minimum around 2000 km. While this trend could reflect reduced tomographic resolution in the middle mantle, we show that it may alternatively relate to real changes in the time-dependent subduction flux and/or a mid-lower mantle viscosity increase. An apparent secondary peak in agreement below 2500 km depth may reflect the degree-two lower mantle slow seismic structures. Vote maps illustrate the potential shortcomings of using a limited number or type of tomography models and slab threshold criteria. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5591187/ /pubmed/28887461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11039-w Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Shephard, G. E.
Matthews, K. J.
Hosseini, K.
Domeier, M.
On the consistency of seismically imaged lower mantle slabs
title On the consistency of seismically imaged lower mantle slabs
title_full On the consistency of seismically imaged lower mantle slabs
title_fullStr On the consistency of seismically imaged lower mantle slabs
title_full_unstemmed On the consistency of seismically imaged lower mantle slabs
title_short On the consistency of seismically imaged lower mantle slabs
title_sort on the consistency of seismically imaged lower mantle slabs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5591187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28887461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11039-w
work_keys_str_mv AT shephardge ontheconsistencyofseismicallyimagedlowermantleslabs
AT matthewskj ontheconsistencyofseismicallyimagedlowermantleslabs
AT hosseinik ontheconsistencyofseismicallyimagedlowermantleslabs
AT domeierm ontheconsistencyofseismicallyimagedlowermantleslabs