Cargando…
Clinical outcomes in ER+ HER2 -node-positive breast cancer patients who were treated according to the Recurrence Score results: evidence from a large prospectively designed registry
The Recurrence Score® is increasingly used in node-positive ER+ HER2-negative breast cancer. This retrospective analysis of a prospectively designed registry evaluated treatments/outcomes in node-positive breast cancer patients who were Recurrence Score-tested through Clalit Health Services from 1/2...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5591314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28900632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-017-0033-7 |
_version_ | 1783262688434978816 |
---|---|
author | Stemmer, Salomon M. Steiner, Mariana Rizel, Shulamith Geffen, David B. Nisenbaum, Bella Peretz, Tamar Soussan-Gutman, Lior Bareket-Samish, Avital Isaacs, Kevin Rosengarten, Ora Fried, Georgeta McCullough, Debbie Svedman, Christer Shak, Steven Liebermann, Nicky Ben-Baruch, Noa |
author_facet | Stemmer, Salomon M. Steiner, Mariana Rizel, Shulamith Geffen, David B. Nisenbaum, Bella Peretz, Tamar Soussan-Gutman, Lior Bareket-Samish, Avital Isaacs, Kevin Rosengarten, Ora Fried, Georgeta McCullough, Debbie Svedman, Christer Shak, Steven Liebermann, Nicky Ben-Baruch, Noa |
author_sort | Stemmer, Salomon M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Recurrence Score® is increasingly used in node-positive ER+ HER2-negative breast cancer. This retrospective analysis of a prospectively designed registry evaluated treatments/outcomes in node-positive breast cancer patients who were Recurrence Score-tested through Clalit Health Services from 1/2006 through 12/2011 (N = 709). Medical records were reviewed to verify treatments/recurrences/survival. Median follow-up, 5.9 years; median age, 62 years; 53.9% grade 2; 69.8% tumors ≤ 2 cm; 84.5% invasive ductal carcinoma; 42.0% N1mi, and 37.2%/15.5%/5.2% with 1/2/3 positive nodes; 53.4% Recurrence Score < 18, 36.4% Recurrence Score 18–30, and 10.2% Recurrence Score ≥ 31. Overall, 26.9% received adjuvant chemotherapy: 7.1%, 39.5%, and 86.1% in the Recurrence Score < 18, 18–30, and ≥ 31 group, respectively. The 5-year Kaplan–Meier estimates for distant recurrence were 3.2%, 6.3%, and 16.9% for these respective groups and the corresponding 5-year breast cancer death estimates were 0.5%, 3.4%, and 5.7%. In Recurrence Score < 18 patients, 5-year distant-recurrence rates for N1mi/1 positive node/2–3 positive nodes were 1.2%/4.4%/5.4%. As patients were not randomized to treatment and treatment decision is heavily influenced by Recurrence Score, analysis of 5-year distant recurrence by chemotherapy use was exploratory and should be interpreted cautiously: In Recurrence Score < 18, recurrence rate was 7.7% in chemotherapy-treated (n = 27) and 2.9% in chemotherapy-untreated patients (n = 352); P = 0.245. In Recurrence Score 18–30, recurrence rate in chemotherapy-treated patients (n = 102) was significantly lower than in untreated patients (n = 156) (1.0% vs. 9.7% P = 0.019); in Recurrence Score ≤ 25 (the RxPONDER study cutoff), recurrence rate was 2.3% in chemotherapy-treated (n = 89) and 4.4% in chemotherapy-untreated patients (n = 488); P = 0.521. In conclusion, our findings support using endocrine therapy alone in ER+ HER2-negative breast cancer patients with micrometastases/1–3 positive nodes and Recurrence Score < 18. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5591314 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55913142017-09-12 Clinical outcomes in ER+ HER2 -node-positive breast cancer patients who were treated according to the Recurrence Score results: evidence from a large prospectively designed registry Stemmer, Salomon M. Steiner, Mariana Rizel, Shulamith Geffen, David B. Nisenbaum, Bella Peretz, Tamar Soussan-Gutman, Lior Bareket-Samish, Avital Isaacs, Kevin Rosengarten, Ora Fried, Georgeta McCullough, Debbie Svedman, Christer Shak, Steven Liebermann, Nicky Ben-Baruch, Noa NPJ Breast Cancer Article The Recurrence Score® is increasingly used in node-positive ER+ HER2-negative breast cancer. This retrospective analysis of a prospectively designed registry evaluated treatments/outcomes in node-positive breast cancer patients who were Recurrence Score-tested through Clalit Health Services from 1/2006 through 12/2011 (N = 709). Medical records were reviewed to verify treatments/recurrences/survival. Median follow-up, 5.9 years; median age, 62 years; 53.9% grade 2; 69.8% tumors ≤ 2 cm; 84.5% invasive ductal carcinoma; 42.0% N1mi, and 37.2%/15.5%/5.2% with 1/2/3 positive nodes; 53.4% Recurrence Score < 18, 36.4% Recurrence Score 18–30, and 10.2% Recurrence Score ≥ 31. Overall, 26.9% received adjuvant chemotherapy: 7.1%, 39.5%, and 86.1% in the Recurrence Score < 18, 18–30, and ≥ 31 group, respectively. The 5-year Kaplan–Meier estimates for distant recurrence were 3.2%, 6.3%, and 16.9% for these respective groups and the corresponding 5-year breast cancer death estimates were 0.5%, 3.4%, and 5.7%. In Recurrence Score < 18 patients, 5-year distant-recurrence rates for N1mi/1 positive node/2–3 positive nodes were 1.2%/4.4%/5.4%. As patients were not randomized to treatment and treatment decision is heavily influenced by Recurrence Score, analysis of 5-year distant recurrence by chemotherapy use was exploratory and should be interpreted cautiously: In Recurrence Score < 18, recurrence rate was 7.7% in chemotherapy-treated (n = 27) and 2.9% in chemotherapy-untreated patients (n = 352); P = 0.245. In Recurrence Score 18–30, recurrence rate in chemotherapy-treated patients (n = 102) was significantly lower than in untreated patients (n = 156) (1.0% vs. 9.7% P = 0.019); in Recurrence Score ≤ 25 (the RxPONDER study cutoff), recurrence rate was 2.3% in chemotherapy-treated (n = 89) and 4.4% in chemotherapy-untreated patients (n = 488); P = 0.521. In conclusion, our findings support using endocrine therapy alone in ER+ HER2-negative breast cancer patients with micrometastases/1–3 positive nodes and Recurrence Score < 18. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5591314/ /pubmed/28900632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-017-0033-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Stemmer, Salomon M. Steiner, Mariana Rizel, Shulamith Geffen, David B. Nisenbaum, Bella Peretz, Tamar Soussan-Gutman, Lior Bareket-Samish, Avital Isaacs, Kevin Rosengarten, Ora Fried, Georgeta McCullough, Debbie Svedman, Christer Shak, Steven Liebermann, Nicky Ben-Baruch, Noa Clinical outcomes in ER+ HER2 -node-positive breast cancer patients who were treated according to the Recurrence Score results: evidence from a large prospectively designed registry |
title | Clinical outcomes in ER+ HER2 -node-positive breast cancer patients who were treated according to the Recurrence Score results: evidence from a large prospectively designed registry |
title_full | Clinical outcomes in ER+ HER2 -node-positive breast cancer patients who were treated according to the Recurrence Score results: evidence from a large prospectively designed registry |
title_fullStr | Clinical outcomes in ER+ HER2 -node-positive breast cancer patients who were treated according to the Recurrence Score results: evidence from a large prospectively designed registry |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical outcomes in ER+ HER2 -node-positive breast cancer patients who were treated according to the Recurrence Score results: evidence from a large prospectively designed registry |
title_short | Clinical outcomes in ER+ HER2 -node-positive breast cancer patients who were treated according to the Recurrence Score results: evidence from a large prospectively designed registry |
title_sort | clinical outcomes in er+ her2 -node-positive breast cancer patients who were treated according to the recurrence score results: evidence from a large prospectively designed registry |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5591314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28900632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-017-0033-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stemmersalomonm clinicaloutcomesinerher2nodepositivebreastcancerpatientswhoweretreatedaccordingtotherecurrencescoreresultsevidencefromalargeprospectivelydesignedregistry AT steinermariana clinicaloutcomesinerher2nodepositivebreastcancerpatientswhoweretreatedaccordingtotherecurrencescoreresultsevidencefromalargeprospectivelydesignedregistry AT rizelshulamith clinicaloutcomesinerher2nodepositivebreastcancerpatientswhoweretreatedaccordingtotherecurrencescoreresultsevidencefromalargeprospectivelydesignedregistry AT geffendavidb clinicaloutcomesinerher2nodepositivebreastcancerpatientswhoweretreatedaccordingtotherecurrencescoreresultsevidencefromalargeprospectivelydesignedregistry AT nisenbaumbella clinicaloutcomesinerher2nodepositivebreastcancerpatientswhoweretreatedaccordingtotherecurrencescoreresultsevidencefromalargeprospectivelydesignedregistry AT peretztamar clinicaloutcomesinerher2nodepositivebreastcancerpatientswhoweretreatedaccordingtotherecurrencescoreresultsevidencefromalargeprospectivelydesignedregistry AT soussangutmanlior clinicaloutcomesinerher2nodepositivebreastcancerpatientswhoweretreatedaccordingtotherecurrencescoreresultsevidencefromalargeprospectivelydesignedregistry AT bareketsamishavital clinicaloutcomesinerher2nodepositivebreastcancerpatientswhoweretreatedaccordingtotherecurrencescoreresultsevidencefromalargeprospectivelydesignedregistry AT isaacskevin clinicaloutcomesinerher2nodepositivebreastcancerpatientswhoweretreatedaccordingtotherecurrencescoreresultsevidencefromalargeprospectivelydesignedregistry AT rosengartenora clinicaloutcomesinerher2nodepositivebreastcancerpatientswhoweretreatedaccordingtotherecurrencescoreresultsevidencefromalargeprospectivelydesignedregistry AT friedgeorgeta clinicaloutcomesinerher2nodepositivebreastcancerpatientswhoweretreatedaccordingtotherecurrencescoreresultsevidencefromalargeprospectivelydesignedregistry AT mcculloughdebbie clinicaloutcomesinerher2nodepositivebreastcancerpatientswhoweretreatedaccordingtotherecurrencescoreresultsevidencefromalargeprospectivelydesignedregistry AT svedmanchrister clinicaloutcomesinerher2nodepositivebreastcancerpatientswhoweretreatedaccordingtotherecurrencescoreresultsevidencefromalargeprospectivelydesignedregistry AT shaksteven clinicaloutcomesinerher2nodepositivebreastcancerpatientswhoweretreatedaccordingtotherecurrencescoreresultsevidencefromalargeprospectivelydesignedregistry AT liebermannnicky clinicaloutcomesinerher2nodepositivebreastcancerpatientswhoweretreatedaccordingtotherecurrencescoreresultsevidencefromalargeprospectivelydesignedregistry AT benbaruchnoa clinicaloutcomesinerher2nodepositivebreastcancerpatientswhoweretreatedaccordingtotherecurrencescoreresultsevidencefromalargeprospectivelydesignedregistry |