Cargando…

Systematic Review of Prognostic Factors for Return to Work in Workers with Sub Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain

Purpose We systematically reviewed the evidence on factors that predict duration of sick leave in workers after 6 weeks low back pain (LBP) related sick leave. We hypothesized that different factors affect the duration of the leave depending on the time away from work. Methods The review occurred in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steenstra, Ivan A., Munhall, Claire, Irvin, Emma, Oranye, Nelson, Passmore, Steven, Van Eerd, Dwayne, Mahood, Quenby, Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5591348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27647141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9666-x
_version_ 1783262696429322240
author Steenstra, Ivan A.
Munhall, Claire
Irvin, Emma
Oranye, Nelson
Passmore, Steven
Van Eerd, Dwayne
Mahood, Quenby
Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah
author_facet Steenstra, Ivan A.
Munhall, Claire
Irvin, Emma
Oranye, Nelson
Passmore, Steven
Van Eerd, Dwayne
Mahood, Quenby
Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah
author_sort Steenstra, Ivan A.
collection PubMed
description Purpose We systematically reviewed the evidence on factors that predict duration of sick leave in workers after 6 weeks low back pain (LBP) related sick leave. We hypothesized that different factors affect the duration of the leave depending on the time away from work. Methods The review occurred in seven phases: (1) developing the central question, (2) conducting the literature search, (3) identifying relevant publications, (4) quality appraisal, (5) data extraction, (6) evidence synthesis, and (7) knowledge translation. We searched for studies that reported episodes of LBP and sick leave that lasted more than 6 weeks. All included studies reported at least one prognostic factor where return to work was the outcome. Results We identified twenty-two relevant publications. The impact of pain, functional status and radiating pain seems to change with duration of work disability. Workers’ recovery expectations remain important after 6 weeks. Modified duties are rarely studied in later phases of work disability. Depression/mental health did not appear to be an important factor in later phases. Workplace physical factors remain important. There is insufficient evidence that pain catastrophising and fear avoidance are predictive factors in later phases. There was moderate evidence for age in the later phases. Functional capacity and claim related factors were supported by some evidence. Discusion Physical demands in the workplace are preventing workers from getting back to work in a timely fashion across phases. The psychosocial work environment is understudied in later phases. Overall, we cannot conclude that prognostic factors change over time. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10926-016-9666-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5591348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55913482017-09-25 Systematic Review of Prognostic Factors for Return to Work in Workers with Sub Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain Steenstra, Ivan A. Munhall, Claire Irvin, Emma Oranye, Nelson Passmore, Steven Van Eerd, Dwayne Mahood, Quenby Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah J Occup Rehabil Review Purpose We systematically reviewed the evidence on factors that predict duration of sick leave in workers after 6 weeks low back pain (LBP) related sick leave. We hypothesized that different factors affect the duration of the leave depending on the time away from work. Methods The review occurred in seven phases: (1) developing the central question, (2) conducting the literature search, (3) identifying relevant publications, (4) quality appraisal, (5) data extraction, (6) evidence synthesis, and (7) knowledge translation. We searched for studies that reported episodes of LBP and sick leave that lasted more than 6 weeks. All included studies reported at least one prognostic factor where return to work was the outcome. Results We identified twenty-two relevant publications. The impact of pain, functional status and radiating pain seems to change with duration of work disability. Workers’ recovery expectations remain important after 6 weeks. Modified duties are rarely studied in later phases of work disability. Depression/mental health did not appear to be an important factor in later phases. Workplace physical factors remain important. There is insufficient evidence that pain catastrophising and fear avoidance are predictive factors in later phases. There was moderate evidence for age in the later phases. Functional capacity and claim related factors were supported by some evidence. Discusion Physical demands in the workplace are preventing workers from getting back to work in a timely fashion across phases. The psychosocial work environment is understudied in later phases. Overall, we cannot conclude that prognostic factors change over time. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10926-016-9666-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2016-09-19 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5591348/ /pubmed/27647141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9666-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Steenstra, Ivan A.
Munhall, Claire
Irvin, Emma
Oranye, Nelson
Passmore, Steven
Van Eerd, Dwayne
Mahood, Quenby
Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah
Systematic Review of Prognostic Factors for Return to Work in Workers with Sub Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain
title Systematic Review of Prognostic Factors for Return to Work in Workers with Sub Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain
title_full Systematic Review of Prognostic Factors for Return to Work in Workers with Sub Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain
title_fullStr Systematic Review of Prognostic Factors for Return to Work in Workers with Sub Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review of Prognostic Factors for Return to Work in Workers with Sub Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain
title_short Systematic Review of Prognostic Factors for Return to Work in Workers with Sub Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain
title_sort systematic review of prognostic factors for return to work in workers with sub acute and chronic low back pain
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5591348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27647141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9666-x
work_keys_str_mv AT steenstraivana systematicreviewofprognosticfactorsforreturntoworkinworkerswithsubacuteandchroniclowbackpain
AT munhallclaire systematicreviewofprognosticfactorsforreturntoworkinworkerswithsubacuteandchroniclowbackpain
AT irvinemma systematicreviewofprognosticfactorsforreturntoworkinworkerswithsubacuteandchroniclowbackpain
AT oranyenelson systematicreviewofprognosticfactorsforreturntoworkinworkerswithsubacuteandchroniclowbackpain
AT passmoresteven systematicreviewofprognosticfactorsforreturntoworkinworkerswithsubacuteandchroniclowbackpain
AT vaneerddwayne systematicreviewofprognosticfactorsforreturntoworkinworkerswithsubacuteandchroniclowbackpain
AT mahoodquenby systematicreviewofprognosticfactorsforreturntoworkinworkerswithsubacuteandchroniclowbackpain
AT hoggjohnsonsheilah systematicreviewofprognosticfactorsforreturntoworkinworkerswithsubacuteandchroniclowbackpain