Cargando…

Safety and effectiveness of oral misoprostol for induction of labour in a resource-limited setting: a dose escalation study

BACKGROUND: Oral misoprostol as an induction of labour (IOL) agent is rapidly gaining popularity in resource-limited settings because it is cheap, stable at ambient temperatures, and logistically easier to administer compared to dinoprostone and oxytocin. We aim to investigate the safety and effecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morris, Marilyn, Bolnga, John W., Verave, Ovoi, Aipit, Jimmy, Rero, Allanie, Laman, Moses
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5591556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28886702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1483-5
_version_ 1783262738286379008
author Morris, Marilyn
Bolnga, John W.
Verave, Ovoi
Aipit, Jimmy
Rero, Allanie
Laman, Moses
author_facet Morris, Marilyn
Bolnga, John W.
Verave, Ovoi
Aipit, Jimmy
Rero, Allanie
Laman, Moses
author_sort Morris, Marilyn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oral misoprostol as an induction of labour (IOL) agent is rapidly gaining popularity in resource-limited settings because it is cheap, stable at ambient temperatures, and logistically easier to administer compared to dinoprostone and oxytocin. We aim to investigate the safety and effectiveness of a regimen of oral misoprostol in Papua New Guinean women undergoing IOL. METHODS: As part of a prospective dose escalation study conducted at Modilon Hospital in Papua New Guinea, women with a singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation and an unfavourable cervix who gave written informed consent were administered oral misoprostol, commencing at 25mcg once every 2 h for 4 doses and increased to 50mcg once every 2 h for 8 doses within 24 h. The primary outcomes studied were i) the proportion of women delivering within 24 h of oral misoprostol administration, and ii) rates of maternal and perinatal severe adverse events. RESULTS: Of 6167 labour ward screened admissions, 209 women (3%) fulfilled the study inclusion criteria and underwent IOL. Overall, 74% (155/209 [95% confidence interval 67.6–79.9]) delivered within 24 h. Most women (90%; 188/209; 95% CI [84.9–93.5]) delivered vaginally with 86% (180/209) having a good outcome for both the mother and baby. Of the 10% (21/209) who failed IOL and underwent caesarean section, a significant proportion of their babies were admitted to special-care nursery compared to babies delivered vaginally (20/21 [95%] versus 8/188 [4%]; Fisher Exact test P < 0.001), but their perinatal mortality rate was not significantly higher (1/21 [5%] versus 2/188 [1%]; P = 0.30). The only maternal death was not study related and occurred in a patient with post-partum haemorrhage, 15 h post-delivery. CONCLUSION: The oral misoprostol regimen for IOL described in the present study is safe, effective and logistically feasible to administer in a resource-limited setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5591556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55915562017-09-13 Safety and effectiveness of oral misoprostol for induction of labour in a resource-limited setting: a dose escalation study Morris, Marilyn Bolnga, John W. Verave, Ovoi Aipit, Jimmy Rero, Allanie Laman, Moses BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Oral misoprostol as an induction of labour (IOL) agent is rapidly gaining popularity in resource-limited settings because it is cheap, stable at ambient temperatures, and logistically easier to administer compared to dinoprostone and oxytocin. We aim to investigate the safety and effectiveness of a regimen of oral misoprostol in Papua New Guinean women undergoing IOL. METHODS: As part of a prospective dose escalation study conducted at Modilon Hospital in Papua New Guinea, women with a singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation and an unfavourable cervix who gave written informed consent were administered oral misoprostol, commencing at 25mcg once every 2 h for 4 doses and increased to 50mcg once every 2 h for 8 doses within 24 h. The primary outcomes studied were i) the proportion of women delivering within 24 h of oral misoprostol administration, and ii) rates of maternal and perinatal severe adverse events. RESULTS: Of 6167 labour ward screened admissions, 209 women (3%) fulfilled the study inclusion criteria and underwent IOL. Overall, 74% (155/209 [95% confidence interval 67.6–79.9]) delivered within 24 h. Most women (90%; 188/209; 95% CI [84.9–93.5]) delivered vaginally with 86% (180/209) having a good outcome for both the mother and baby. Of the 10% (21/209) who failed IOL and underwent caesarean section, a significant proportion of their babies were admitted to special-care nursery compared to babies delivered vaginally (20/21 [95%] versus 8/188 [4%]; Fisher Exact test P < 0.001), but their perinatal mortality rate was not significantly higher (1/21 [5%] versus 2/188 [1%]; P = 0.30). The only maternal death was not study related and occurred in a patient with post-partum haemorrhage, 15 h post-delivery. CONCLUSION: The oral misoprostol regimen for IOL described in the present study is safe, effective and logistically feasible to administer in a resource-limited setting. BioMed Central 2017-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5591556/ /pubmed/28886702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1483-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Morris, Marilyn
Bolnga, John W.
Verave, Ovoi
Aipit, Jimmy
Rero, Allanie
Laman, Moses
Safety and effectiveness of oral misoprostol for induction of labour in a resource-limited setting: a dose escalation study
title Safety and effectiveness of oral misoprostol for induction of labour in a resource-limited setting: a dose escalation study
title_full Safety and effectiveness of oral misoprostol for induction of labour in a resource-limited setting: a dose escalation study
title_fullStr Safety and effectiveness of oral misoprostol for induction of labour in a resource-limited setting: a dose escalation study
title_full_unstemmed Safety and effectiveness of oral misoprostol for induction of labour in a resource-limited setting: a dose escalation study
title_short Safety and effectiveness of oral misoprostol for induction of labour in a resource-limited setting: a dose escalation study
title_sort safety and effectiveness of oral misoprostol for induction of labour in a resource-limited setting: a dose escalation study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5591556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28886702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1483-5
work_keys_str_mv AT morrismarilyn safetyandeffectivenessoforalmisoprostolforinductionoflabourinaresourcelimitedsettingadoseescalationstudy
AT bolngajohnw safetyandeffectivenessoforalmisoprostolforinductionoflabourinaresourcelimitedsettingadoseescalationstudy
AT veraveovoi safetyandeffectivenessoforalmisoprostolforinductionoflabourinaresourcelimitedsettingadoseescalationstudy
AT aipitjimmy safetyandeffectivenessoforalmisoprostolforinductionoflabourinaresourcelimitedsettingadoseescalationstudy
AT reroallanie safetyandeffectivenessoforalmisoprostolforinductionoflabourinaresourcelimitedsettingadoseescalationstudy
AT lamanmoses safetyandeffectivenessoforalmisoprostolforinductionoflabourinaresourcelimitedsettingadoseescalationstudy