Cargando…

Safety and effectiveness of oral misoprostol for induction of labour in a resource-limited setting: a dose escalation study

BACKGROUND: Oral misoprostol as an induction of labour (IOL) agent is rapidly gaining popularity in resource-limited settings because it is cheap, stable at ambient temperatures, and logistically easier to administer compared to dinoprostone and oxytocin. We aim to investigate the safety and effecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Morris, Marilyn, Bolnga, John W., Verave, Ovoi, Aipit, Jimmy, Rero, Allanie, Laman, Moses
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2017
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5591556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28886702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1483-5

Ejemplares similares

The burden of presumed tuberculosis in hospitalized children in a resource-limited setting in Papua New Guinea: a prospective observational study
por: Watch, Villa, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Outcome of misoprostol and oxytocin in induction of labour
por: Acharya, Trishna, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Simplifying oral misoprostol protocols for the induction of labour
por: Weeks, AD, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction
por: Noor, Nasreen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study
por: Bolla, Daniele, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Induction of labour with sequential double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone in obese women
por: Kehl, Sven, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Labour Induction with Misoprostol in German Obstetric Clinics: What Are the Facts on Such Use?
por: Kehl, Sven, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Misoprostol vs dinoprostone vaginal insert in labour induction: comparison of obstetrical outcome
por: Mlodawski, Jakub, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Confirming Cerebral Malaria Deaths in Resource-Limited Settings
por: Laman, Moses, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Role of Combination OF Mifepristone and Misoprostol Verses Misoprostol alone in Induction of Labour in Late Intrauterin Fetal Death: A Prospective Study
por: Panda, Subrat, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Effects of Misoprostol on Induction of Labour in Patients with Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis
por: Wang, Leilei, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Retracted: Effects of Misoprostol on Induction of Labour in Patients with Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis
por: Healthcare Engineering, Journal of
Publicado: (2023)

The Induction with Foley OR Misoprostol (INFORM) Study dataset. A dataset of 602 women with hypertensive disease in pregnancy, in India, randomised to either Foley catheter or oral misoprostol for induction of labour
por: Mundle, Shuchita, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Oral Misoprostol alone versus oral misoprostol followed by oxytocin for labour induction in women with hypertension in pregnancy (MOLI): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
por: Bracken, Hillary, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Heterogenous use of misoprostol for induction of labour: results of an online survey among midwives in German-speaking countries
por: Bossung, Verena, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
por: Lapuente-Ocamica, O., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comparison of Misoprostol and Dinoprostone for elective induction of labour in nulliparous women at full term: A randomized prospective study
por: Papanikolaou, Evangelos G, et al.
Publicado: (2004)

Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol
por: Bracken, Hillary, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Efficacy and safety of oral and sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Pergialiotis, Vasilios, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for labor induction
por: Elpo, Jhonathan Alcides, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Obstetric Outcome and Significance of Labour Induction in a Health Resource Poor Setting
por: Lawani, Osaheni Lucky, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Ethical challenges in integrating patient-care with clinical research in a resource-limited setting: perspectives from Papua New Guinea
por: Laman, Moses, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Sublingual misoprostol vs. oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor: A retrospective study
por: Amini, Mahdi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Induction of labour with a Foley catheter or oral misoprostol at term: the PROBAAT-II study, a multicentre randomised controlled trial
por: ten Eikelder, Mieke LG, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: cost consequences analysis of misoprostol in low-resource settings
por: Lang, Danielle L., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Reduction in resource use with the misoprostol vaginal insert vs the dinoprostone vaginal insert for labour induction: a model-based analysis from a United Kingdom healthcare perspective
por: Draycott, T., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Correction: Induction of labour with a Foley catheter or oral misoprostol at term: the PROBAAT-II study, a multicentre randomised controlled trial
por: ten Eikelder, Mieke LG, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial
por: Young, David C., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of Intracervical Foley’s Catheter With Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Kadu, Nivedita A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Induction of Labour
Publicado: (1908)

Induction of Labour
por: Charlewood, G. P.
Publicado: (1938)

Induction of Labour
por: Paterson, Susanne J.
Publicado: (1937)

Induction of labour in nulliparous women- quick or slow: a cohort study comparing slow-release vaginal insert with low-dose misoprostol oral tablets
por: Eriksson, Axelina, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Treatment of retained placenta with misoprostol: a randomised controlled trial in a low-resource setting (Tanzania)
por: van Beekhuizen, Heleen J, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Labor induction with randomized comparison of cervical, oral and intravaginal misoprostol
por: Dadashaliha, Masoumeh, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Pharmacokinetics of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for labor induction at term
por: Vorontsova, Yana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Can the Induction of Labor with Misoprostol Increase Maternal Blood Loss?
por: Souza, Paulo César Praciano, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The use of newborn foot length to identify low birth weight and preterm babies in Papua New Guinea: A diagnostic accuracy study
por: Mengi, Alice, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study
por: Marsdal, Kjersti Engen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

On the Induction of Premature Labour
por: Brunton, John
Publicado: (1869)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_rmgumntk4spe3icugnsom2klug