Cargando…

Cortical Activation during Action Observation, Action Execution, and Interpersonal Synchrony in Adults: A functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study

Introduction: Humans engage in Interpersonal Synchrony (IPS) as they synchronize their own actions with that of a social partner over time. When humans engage in imitation/IPS behaviors, multiple regions in the frontal, temporal, and parietal cortices are activated including the putative Mirror Neur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhat, Anjana N., Hoffman, Michael D., Trost, Susanna L., Culotta, McKenzie L., Eilbott, Jeffrey, Tsuzuki, Daisuke, Pelphrey, Kevin A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5591977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28928646
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00431
_version_ 1783262823472693248
author Bhat, Anjana N.
Hoffman, Michael D.
Trost, Susanna L.
Culotta, McKenzie L.
Eilbott, Jeffrey
Tsuzuki, Daisuke
Pelphrey, Kevin A.
author_facet Bhat, Anjana N.
Hoffman, Michael D.
Trost, Susanna L.
Culotta, McKenzie L.
Eilbott, Jeffrey
Tsuzuki, Daisuke
Pelphrey, Kevin A.
author_sort Bhat, Anjana N.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Humans engage in Interpersonal Synchrony (IPS) as they synchronize their own actions with that of a social partner over time. When humans engage in imitation/IPS behaviors, multiple regions in the frontal, temporal, and parietal cortices are activated including the putative Mirror Neuron Systems (Iacoboni, 2005; Buxbaum et al., 2014). In the present study, we compared fNIRS-based cortical activation patterns across three conditions of action observation (“Watch” partner), action execution (“Do” on your own), and IPS (move “Together”). Methods: Fifteen typically developing adults completed a reach and cleanup task with the right arm while cortical activation was examined using a 24-channel, Hitachi fNIRS system. Each adult completed 8 trials across three conditions (Watch, Do, and Together). For each fNIRS channel, we obtained oxy hemoglobin (HbO(2)) and deoxy hemoglobin (HHb) profiles. Spatial registration methods were applied to localize the cortical regions underneath each channel and to define six regions of interest (ROIs), right and left supero-anterior (SA or pre/post-central gyri), infero-posterior (IP or angular/supramarginal gyri), and infero-anterior (IA or superior/middle temporal gyri) regions. Results: In terms of task-related differences, the majority of the ROIs were more active during Do and Together compared to Watch. Only the right/ipsilateral fronto-parietal and inferior parietal cortices had greater activation during Together compared to Do. Conclusions: The similarities in cortical activation between action execution and IPS suggest that neural control of IPS is more similar to its execution than observational aspects. To be clear, the more complex the actions performed, the more difficult the IPS behaviors. Secondly, IPS behaviors required slightly more right-sided activation (vs. execution/observation) suggesting that IPS is a higher-order process involving more bilateral activation compared to its sub-components. These findings provide a neuroimaging framework to study imitation and IPS impairments in special populations such as infants at risk for and children with ASD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5591977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55919772017-09-19 Cortical Activation during Action Observation, Action Execution, and Interpersonal Synchrony in Adults: A functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study Bhat, Anjana N. Hoffman, Michael D. Trost, Susanna L. Culotta, McKenzie L. Eilbott, Jeffrey Tsuzuki, Daisuke Pelphrey, Kevin A. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Introduction: Humans engage in Interpersonal Synchrony (IPS) as they synchronize their own actions with that of a social partner over time. When humans engage in imitation/IPS behaviors, multiple regions in the frontal, temporal, and parietal cortices are activated including the putative Mirror Neuron Systems (Iacoboni, 2005; Buxbaum et al., 2014). In the present study, we compared fNIRS-based cortical activation patterns across three conditions of action observation (“Watch” partner), action execution (“Do” on your own), and IPS (move “Together”). Methods: Fifteen typically developing adults completed a reach and cleanup task with the right arm while cortical activation was examined using a 24-channel, Hitachi fNIRS system. Each adult completed 8 trials across three conditions (Watch, Do, and Together). For each fNIRS channel, we obtained oxy hemoglobin (HbO(2)) and deoxy hemoglobin (HHb) profiles. Spatial registration methods were applied to localize the cortical regions underneath each channel and to define six regions of interest (ROIs), right and left supero-anterior (SA or pre/post-central gyri), infero-posterior (IP or angular/supramarginal gyri), and infero-anterior (IA or superior/middle temporal gyri) regions. Results: In terms of task-related differences, the majority of the ROIs were more active during Do and Together compared to Watch. Only the right/ipsilateral fronto-parietal and inferior parietal cortices had greater activation during Together compared to Do. Conclusions: The similarities in cortical activation between action execution and IPS suggest that neural control of IPS is more similar to its execution than observational aspects. To be clear, the more complex the actions performed, the more difficult the IPS behaviors. Secondly, IPS behaviors required slightly more right-sided activation (vs. execution/observation) suggesting that IPS is a higher-order process involving more bilateral activation compared to its sub-components. These findings provide a neuroimaging framework to study imitation and IPS impairments in special populations such as infants at risk for and children with ASD. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5591977/ /pubmed/28928646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00431 Text en Copyright © 2017 Bhat, Hoffman, Trost, Culotta, Eilbott, Tsuzuki and Pelphrey. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Bhat, Anjana N.
Hoffman, Michael D.
Trost, Susanna L.
Culotta, McKenzie L.
Eilbott, Jeffrey
Tsuzuki, Daisuke
Pelphrey, Kevin A.
Cortical Activation during Action Observation, Action Execution, and Interpersonal Synchrony in Adults: A functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study
title Cortical Activation during Action Observation, Action Execution, and Interpersonal Synchrony in Adults: A functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study
title_full Cortical Activation during Action Observation, Action Execution, and Interpersonal Synchrony in Adults: A functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study
title_fullStr Cortical Activation during Action Observation, Action Execution, and Interpersonal Synchrony in Adults: A functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study
title_full_unstemmed Cortical Activation during Action Observation, Action Execution, and Interpersonal Synchrony in Adults: A functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study
title_short Cortical Activation during Action Observation, Action Execution, and Interpersonal Synchrony in Adults: A functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study
title_sort cortical activation during action observation, action execution, and interpersonal synchrony in adults: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fnirs) study
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5591977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28928646
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00431
work_keys_str_mv AT bhatanjanan corticalactivationduringactionobservationactionexecutionandinterpersonalsynchronyinadultsafunctionalnearinfraredspectroscopyfnirsstudy
AT hoffmanmichaeld corticalactivationduringactionobservationactionexecutionandinterpersonalsynchronyinadultsafunctionalnearinfraredspectroscopyfnirsstudy
AT trostsusannal corticalactivationduringactionobservationactionexecutionandinterpersonalsynchronyinadultsafunctionalnearinfraredspectroscopyfnirsstudy
AT culottamckenziel corticalactivationduringactionobservationactionexecutionandinterpersonalsynchronyinadultsafunctionalnearinfraredspectroscopyfnirsstudy
AT eilbottjeffrey corticalactivationduringactionobservationactionexecutionandinterpersonalsynchronyinadultsafunctionalnearinfraredspectroscopyfnirsstudy
AT tsuzukidaisuke corticalactivationduringactionobservationactionexecutionandinterpersonalsynchronyinadultsafunctionalnearinfraredspectroscopyfnirsstudy
AT pelphreykevina corticalactivationduringactionobservationactionexecutionandinterpersonalsynchronyinadultsafunctionalnearinfraredspectroscopyfnirsstudy