Cargando…

Expanding the population coverage of evidence–based interventions with community health workers to save the lives of mothers and children: an analysis of potential global impact using the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)

BACKGROUND: Evidence has been accumulating that community health workers (CHWs) providing evidence–based interventions as part of community–based primary health care (CBPHC) can lead to reductions in maternal, neonatal and child mortality. However, investments to strengthen and scale–up CHW programs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chou, Victoria B, Friberg, Ingrid K, Christian, Mervyn, Walker, Neff, Perry, Henry B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Edinburgh University Global Health Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5592116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28959436
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.07.020401
_version_ 1783262837759541248
author Chou, Victoria B
Friberg, Ingrid K
Christian, Mervyn
Walker, Neff
Perry, Henry B
author_facet Chou, Victoria B
Friberg, Ingrid K
Christian, Mervyn
Walker, Neff
Perry, Henry B
author_sort Chou, Victoria B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence has been accumulating that community health workers (CHWs) providing evidence–based interventions as part of community–based primary health care (CBPHC) can lead to reductions in maternal, neonatal and child mortality. However, investments to strengthen and scale–up CHW programs still remain modest. METHODS: We used the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) to estimate the number of maternal, neonatal and child deaths and stillbirths that could be prevented if 73 countries effectively scaled up the population coverage of 30 evidence–based interventions that CHWs can deliver in these high–burden countries. We set population coverage targets at 50%, 70%, and 90% and summed the country–level results by region and by all 73 high–burden countries combined. We also estimated which specific interventions would save the most lives. FINDINGS: LiST estimates that a total of 3.0 (sensitivity bounds 1.8–4.0), 4.9 (3.1–6.3) and 6.9 (3.7–8.7) million deaths would be prevented between 2016 and 2020 if CBPHC is gradually scaled up during this period and if coverage of key interventions reaches 50%, 70%, and 90% respectively. There would be 14%, 23%, and 32% fewer deaths in the final year compared to a scenario assuming no intervention coverage scale up. The Africa Region would receive the most benefit by far: 58% of the lives saved at 90% coverage would be in this region. The interventions contributing the greatest impact are nutritional interventions during pregnancy, treatment of malaria with artemisinin compounds, oral rehydration solution for childhood diarrhea, hand washing with soap, and oral antibiotics for pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Scaling up CHW programming to increase population–level coverage of life–saving interventions represents a very promising strategy to achieve universal health coverage and end preventable maternal and child deaths by 2030. Numerous practical challenges must be overcome, but there is no better alternative at present. Expanding the coverage of key interventions for maternal nutrition and treatment of childhood illnesses, in particular, may produce the greatest gains. Recognizing the millions of lives of mothers and their young offspring that could be achieved by expanding coverage of evidence–based interventions provided by CHWs and strengthening the CBPHC systems that support them underscores the pressing need for commitment from governments and donors over the next 15 years to prioritize funding, so that robust CHW platforms can be refined, strengthened, and expanded.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5592116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Edinburgh University Global Health Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55921162017-09-28 Expanding the population coverage of evidence–based interventions with community health workers to save the lives of mothers and children: an analysis of potential global impact using the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) Chou, Victoria B Friberg, Ingrid K Christian, Mervyn Walker, Neff Perry, Henry B J Glob Health Articles BACKGROUND: Evidence has been accumulating that community health workers (CHWs) providing evidence–based interventions as part of community–based primary health care (CBPHC) can lead to reductions in maternal, neonatal and child mortality. However, investments to strengthen and scale–up CHW programs still remain modest. METHODS: We used the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) to estimate the number of maternal, neonatal and child deaths and stillbirths that could be prevented if 73 countries effectively scaled up the population coverage of 30 evidence–based interventions that CHWs can deliver in these high–burden countries. We set population coverage targets at 50%, 70%, and 90% and summed the country–level results by region and by all 73 high–burden countries combined. We also estimated which specific interventions would save the most lives. FINDINGS: LiST estimates that a total of 3.0 (sensitivity bounds 1.8–4.0), 4.9 (3.1–6.3) and 6.9 (3.7–8.7) million deaths would be prevented between 2016 and 2020 if CBPHC is gradually scaled up during this period and if coverage of key interventions reaches 50%, 70%, and 90% respectively. There would be 14%, 23%, and 32% fewer deaths in the final year compared to a scenario assuming no intervention coverage scale up. The Africa Region would receive the most benefit by far: 58% of the lives saved at 90% coverage would be in this region. The interventions contributing the greatest impact are nutritional interventions during pregnancy, treatment of malaria with artemisinin compounds, oral rehydration solution for childhood diarrhea, hand washing with soap, and oral antibiotics for pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Scaling up CHW programming to increase population–level coverage of life–saving interventions represents a very promising strategy to achieve universal health coverage and end preventable maternal and child deaths by 2030. Numerous practical challenges must be overcome, but there is no better alternative at present. Expanding the coverage of key interventions for maternal nutrition and treatment of childhood illnesses, in particular, may produce the greatest gains. Recognizing the millions of lives of mothers and their young offspring that could be achieved by expanding coverage of evidence–based interventions provided by CHWs and strengthening the CBPHC systems that support them underscores the pressing need for commitment from governments and donors over the next 15 years to prioritize funding, so that robust CHW platforms can be refined, strengthened, and expanded. Edinburgh University Global Health Society 2017-12 2017-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5592116/ /pubmed/28959436 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.07.020401 Text en Copyright © 2017 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Articles
Chou, Victoria B
Friberg, Ingrid K
Christian, Mervyn
Walker, Neff
Perry, Henry B
Expanding the population coverage of evidence–based interventions with community health workers to save the lives of mothers and children: an analysis of potential global impact using the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)
title Expanding the population coverage of evidence–based interventions with community health workers to save the lives of mothers and children: an analysis of potential global impact using the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)
title_full Expanding the population coverage of evidence–based interventions with community health workers to save the lives of mothers and children: an analysis of potential global impact using the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)
title_fullStr Expanding the population coverage of evidence–based interventions with community health workers to save the lives of mothers and children: an analysis of potential global impact using the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)
title_full_unstemmed Expanding the population coverage of evidence–based interventions with community health workers to save the lives of mothers and children: an analysis of potential global impact using the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)
title_short Expanding the population coverage of evidence–based interventions with community health workers to save the lives of mothers and children: an analysis of potential global impact using the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)
title_sort expanding the population coverage of evidence–based interventions with community health workers to save the lives of mothers and children: an analysis of potential global impact using the lives saved tool (list)
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5592116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28959436
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.07.020401
work_keys_str_mv AT chouvictoriab expandingthepopulationcoverageofevidencebasedinterventionswithcommunityhealthworkerstosavethelivesofmothersandchildrenananalysisofpotentialglobalimpactusingthelivessavedtoollist
AT fribergingridk expandingthepopulationcoverageofevidencebasedinterventionswithcommunityhealthworkerstosavethelivesofmothersandchildrenananalysisofpotentialglobalimpactusingthelivessavedtoollist
AT christianmervyn expandingthepopulationcoverageofevidencebasedinterventionswithcommunityhealthworkerstosavethelivesofmothersandchildrenananalysisofpotentialglobalimpactusingthelivessavedtoollist
AT walkerneff expandingthepopulationcoverageofevidencebasedinterventionswithcommunityhealthworkerstosavethelivesofmothersandchildrenananalysisofpotentialglobalimpactusingthelivessavedtoollist
AT perryhenryb expandingthepopulationcoverageofevidencebasedinterventionswithcommunityhealthworkerstosavethelivesofmothersandchildrenananalysisofpotentialglobalimpactusingthelivessavedtoollist