Cargando…

Probiotics for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent, burdensome, and psychologically important pediatric concern. Probiotics have been suggested as a treatment for AD. Some reports have explored this topic; however, the utility of probiotics for AD remains to be firmly established. Methods: To assess t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Ruixue, Ning, Huacheng, Shen, Minxue, Li, Jie, Zhang, Jianglin, Chen, Xiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5592329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932705
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00392
_version_ 1783262862383251456
author Huang, Ruixue
Ning, Huacheng
Shen, Minxue
Li, Jie
Zhang, Jianglin
Chen, Xiang
author_facet Huang, Ruixue
Ning, Huacheng
Shen, Minxue
Li, Jie
Zhang, Jianglin
Chen, Xiang
author_sort Huang, Ruixue
collection PubMed
description Objective: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent, burdensome, and psychologically important pediatric concern. Probiotics have been suggested as a treatment for AD. Some reports have explored this topic; however, the utility of probiotics for AD remains to be firmly established. Methods: To assess the effects of probiotics on AD in children, the PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library Scopus, and OVID databases were searched for reports published in the English language. Results: Thirteen studies were identified. Significantly higher SCORAD values favoring probiotics over controls were observed (mean difference [MD], −3.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], −6.12 to −0.03; P < 0.001). The reported efficacy of probiotics in children < 1 year old was −1.03 (95%CI, −7.05 to 4.99) and that in children 1–18 years old was −4.50 (95%CI, −7.45 to −1.54; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that in Europe, SCORAD revealed no effect of probiotics, whereas significantly lower SCORAD values were reported in Asia (MD, −5.39; 95%CI, −8.91 to −1.87). Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (MD, 3.29; 95%CI, −0.30 to 6.88; P = 0.07) and Lactobacillus plantarum (MD, −0.70; 95%CI, −2.30 to 0.90; P = 0.39) showed no significant effect on SCORAD values in children with AD. However, Lactobacillus fermentum (MD, −11.42; 95%CI, −13.81 to −9.04), Lactobacillus salivarius (MD, −7.21; 95%CI, −9.63 to −4.78), and a mixture of different strains (MD, −3.52; 95%CI, −5.61 to −1.44) showed significant effects on SCORAD values in children with AD. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis indicated that the research to date has not robustly shown that probiotics are beneficial for children with AD. However, caution is needed when generalizing our results, as the populations evaluated were heterogeneous. Randomized controlled trials with larger samples and greater power are necessary to identify the species, dose, and treatment duration of probiotics that are most efficacious for treating AD in children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5592329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55923292017-09-20 Probiotics for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Huang, Ruixue Ning, Huacheng Shen, Minxue Li, Jie Zhang, Jianglin Chen, Xiang Front Cell Infect Microbiol Microbiology Objective: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent, burdensome, and psychologically important pediatric concern. Probiotics have been suggested as a treatment for AD. Some reports have explored this topic; however, the utility of probiotics for AD remains to be firmly established. Methods: To assess the effects of probiotics on AD in children, the PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library Scopus, and OVID databases were searched for reports published in the English language. Results: Thirteen studies were identified. Significantly higher SCORAD values favoring probiotics over controls were observed (mean difference [MD], −3.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], −6.12 to −0.03; P < 0.001). The reported efficacy of probiotics in children < 1 year old was −1.03 (95%CI, −7.05 to 4.99) and that in children 1–18 years old was −4.50 (95%CI, −7.45 to −1.54; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that in Europe, SCORAD revealed no effect of probiotics, whereas significantly lower SCORAD values were reported in Asia (MD, −5.39; 95%CI, −8.91 to −1.87). Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (MD, 3.29; 95%CI, −0.30 to 6.88; P = 0.07) and Lactobacillus plantarum (MD, −0.70; 95%CI, −2.30 to 0.90; P = 0.39) showed no significant effect on SCORAD values in children with AD. However, Lactobacillus fermentum (MD, −11.42; 95%CI, −13.81 to −9.04), Lactobacillus salivarius (MD, −7.21; 95%CI, −9.63 to −4.78), and a mixture of different strains (MD, −3.52; 95%CI, −5.61 to −1.44) showed significant effects on SCORAD values in children with AD. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis indicated that the research to date has not robustly shown that probiotics are beneficial for children with AD. However, caution is needed when generalizing our results, as the populations evaluated were heterogeneous. Randomized controlled trials with larger samples and greater power are necessary to identify the species, dose, and treatment duration of probiotics that are most efficacious for treating AD in children. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5592329/ /pubmed/28932705 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00392 Text en Copyright © 2017 Huang, Ning, Shen, Li, Zhang and Chen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Huang, Ruixue
Ning, Huacheng
Shen, Minxue
Li, Jie
Zhang, Jianglin
Chen, Xiang
Probiotics for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Probiotics for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Probiotics for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Probiotics for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Probiotics for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Probiotics for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort probiotics for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5592329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932705
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00392
work_keys_str_mv AT huangruixue probioticsforthetreatmentofatopicdermatitisinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT ninghuacheng probioticsforthetreatmentofatopicdermatitisinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shenminxue probioticsforthetreatmentofatopicdermatitisinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lijie probioticsforthetreatmentofatopicdermatitisinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangjianglin probioticsforthetreatmentofatopicdermatitisinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chenxiang probioticsforthetreatmentofatopicdermatitisinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials