Cargando…
‘Validation of ultrasound examinations performed by general practitioners’
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic agreement when a general practitioner and subsequently a specialist (radiologist/gynecologist) performed point-of-care ultrasound examinations for certain abdominal and gynecological conditions of low to moderate complexity. DESIGN: A p...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5592352/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28776457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2017.1358437 |
_version_ | 1783262865599234048 |
---|---|
author | Lindgaard, Karsten Riisgaard, Lars |
author_facet | Lindgaard, Karsten Riisgaard, Lars |
author_sort | Lindgaard, Karsten |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic agreement when a general practitioner and subsequently a specialist (radiologist/gynecologist) performed point-of-care ultrasound examinations for certain abdominal and gynecological conditions of low to moderate complexity. DESIGN: A prospective study of inter-rater reliability and agreement. SETTING: Patients were recruited and initially scanned in general practice. The validation examinations were conducted in a hospital setting. SUBJECTS: A convenient sample of 114 patients presenting with abdominal pain or discomfort, possible pregnancy or known risk factors toward abdominal aortic aneurism were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inter-rater agreement (Kappa statistic and percentage agreement) between ultrasound examinations by general practitioner and specialist for the following conditions: gallstones, ascites, abdominal aorta >5 cm, intrauterine pregnancy and gestational age. RESULTS: An overall Kappa value of 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87–0.98) was obtained. Ascites, abdominal aortic diameter >5cm, and intrauterine pregnancy showed Kappa values of 1. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that general practitioners performing point-of-care ultrasound examinations with low-to-moderate complexity had a very high rate of inter-rater agreement compared with specialists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5592352 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55923522017-09-14 ‘Validation of ultrasound examinations performed by general practitioners’ Lindgaard, Karsten Riisgaard, Lars Scand J Prim Health Care Research Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic agreement when a general practitioner and subsequently a specialist (radiologist/gynecologist) performed point-of-care ultrasound examinations for certain abdominal and gynecological conditions of low to moderate complexity. DESIGN: A prospective study of inter-rater reliability and agreement. SETTING: Patients were recruited and initially scanned in general practice. The validation examinations were conducted in a hospital setting. SUBJECTS: A convenient sample of 114 patients presenting with abdominal pain or discomfort, possible pregnancy or known risk factors toward abdominal aortic aneurism were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inter-rater agreement (Kappa statistic and percentage agreement) between ultrasound examinations by general practitioner and specialist for the following conditions: gallstones, ascites, abdominal aorta >5 cm, intrauterine pregnancy and gestational age. RESULTS: An overall Kappa value of 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87–0.98) was obtained. Ascites, abdominal aortic diameter >5cm, and intrauterine pregnancy showed Kappa values of 1. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that general practitioners performing point-of-care ultrasound examinations with low-to-moderate complexity had a very high rate of inter-rater agreement compared with specialists. Taylor & Francis 2017-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5592352/ /pubmed/28776457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2017.1358437 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Lindgaard, Karsten Riisgaard, Lars ‘Validation of ultrasound examinations performed by general practitioners’ |
title | ‘Validation of ultrasound examinations performed by general practitioners’ |
title_full | ‘Validation of ultrasound examinations performed by general practitioners’ |
title_fullStr | ‘Validation of ultrasound examinations performed by general practitioners’ |
title_full_unstemmed | ‘Validation of ultrasound examinations performed by general practitioners’ |
title_short | ‘Validation of ultrasound examinations performed by general practitioners’ |
title_sort | ‘validation of ultrasound examinations performed by general practitioners’ |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5592352/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28776457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2017.1358437 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lindgaardkarsten validationofultrasoundexaminationsperformedbygeneralpractitioners AT riisgaardlars validationofultrasoundexaminationsperformedbygeneralpractitioners |