Cargando…

‘Validation of ultrasound examinations performed by general practitioners’

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic agreement when a general practitioner and subsequently a specialist (radiologist/gynecologist) performed point-of-care ultrasound examinations for certain abdominal and gynecological conditions of low to moderate complexity. DESIGN: A p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindgaard, Karsten, Riisgaard, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5592352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28776457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2017.1358437
_version_ 1783262865599234048
author Lindgaard, Karsten
Riisgaard, Lars
author_facet Lindgaard, Karsten
Riisgaard, Lars
author_sort Lindgaard, Karsten
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic agreement when a general practitioner and subsequently a specialist (radiologist/gynecologist) performed point-of-care ultrasound examinations for certain abdominal and gynecological conditions of low to moderate complexity. DESIGN: A prospective study of inter-rater reliability and agreement. SETTING: Patients were recruited and initially scanned in general practice. The validation examinations were conducted in a hospital setting. SUBJECTS: A convenient sample of 114 patients presenting with abdominal pain or discomfort, possible pregnancy or known risk factors toward abdominal aortic aneurism were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inter-rater agreement (Kappa statistic and percentage agreement) between ultrasound examinations by general practitioner and specialist for the following conditions: gallstones, ascites, abdominal aorta >5 cm, intrauterine pregnancy and gestational age. RESULTS: An overall Kappa value of 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87–0.98) was obtained. Ascites, abdominal aortic diameter >5cm, and intrauterine pregnancy showed Kappa values of 1. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that general practitioners performing point-of-care ultrasound examinations with low-to-moderate complexity had a very high rate of inter-rater agreement compared with specialists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5592352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55923522017-09-14 ‘Validation of ultrasound examinations performed by general practitioners’ Lindgaard, Karsten Riisgaard, Lars Scand J Prim Health Care Research Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic agreement when a general practitioner and subsequently a specialist (radiologist/gynecologist) performed point-of-care ultrasound examinations for certain abdominal and gynecological conditions of low to moderate complexity. DESIGN: A prospective study of inter-rater reliability and agreement. SETTING: Patients were recruited and initially scanned in general practice. The validation examinations were conducted in a hospital setting. SUBJECTS: A convenient sample of 114 patients presenting with abdominal pain or discomfort, possible pregnancy or known risk factors toward abdominal aortic aneurism were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inter-rater agreement (Kappa statistic and percentage agreement) between ultrasound examinations by general practitioner and specialist for the following conditions: gallstones, ascites, abdominal aorta >5 cm, intrauterine pregnancy and gestational age. RESULTS: An overall Kappa value of 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87–0.98) was obtained. Ascites, abdominal aortic diameter >5cm, and intrauterine pregnancy showed Kappa values of 1. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that general practitioners performing point-of-care ultrasound examinations with low-to-moderate complexity had a very high rate of inter-rater agreement compared with specialists. Taylor & Francis 2017-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5592352/ /pubmed/28776457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2017.1358437 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Lindgaard, Karsten
Riisgaard, Lars
‘Validation of ultrasound examinations performed by general practitioners’
title ‘Validation of ultrasound examinations performed by general practitioners’
title_full ‘Validation of ultrasound examinations performed by general practitioners’
title_fullStr ‘Validation of ultrasound examinations performed by general practitioners’
title_full_unstemmed ‘Validation of ultrasound examinations performed by general practitioners’
title_short ‘Validation of ultrasound examinations performed by general practitioners’
title_sort ‘validation of ultrasound examinations performed by general practitioners’
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5592352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28776457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2017.1358437
work_keys_str_mv AT lindgaardkarsten validationofultrasoundexaminationsperformedbygeneralpractitioners
AT riisgaardlars validationofultrasoundexaminationsperformedbygeneralpractitioners