Cargando…
Current practice in the management of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: a UK-wide survey
BACKGROUND: New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in critically ill patients. Although evidence base and expert consensus opinion for management have been summarised in several international guidelines, no specific considerations for critically ill patients have been inclu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5592903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28929012 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3716 |
_version_ | 1783262956402769920 |
---|---|
author | Chean, Chung Shen McAuley, Daniel Gordon, Anthony Welters, Ingeborg Dorothea |
author_facet | Chean, Chung Shen McAuley, Daniel Gordon, Anthony Welters, Ingeborg Dorothea |
author_sort | Chean, Chung Shen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in critically ill patients. Although evidence base and expert consensus opinion for management have been summarised in several international guidelines, no specific considerations for critically ill patients have been included. We aimed to establish current practice of management of critically ill patients with new-onset AF. METHODS: We designed a short user-friendly online questionnaire. All members of the Intensive Care Society were invited via email containing a link to the questionnaire, which comprised 21 questions. The online survey was conducted between November 2016 and December 2016. RESULTS: The response rate was 397/3152 (12.6%). The majority of respondents (81.1%) worked in mixed Intensive Care Units and were consultants (71.8%). Most respondents (39.5%) would start intervention on patients with fast new-onset AF and stable blood pressure at a heart rate between 120 and 139 beats/min. However, 34.8% of participants would treat all patients who developed new-onset fast AF. Amiodarone and beta-blockers (80.9% and 11.6% of answers) were the most commonly used anti-arrhythmics. A total of 63.8% of respondents do not regularly anti-coagulate critically ill patients with new-onset fast AF, while 30.8% anti-coagulate within 72 hours. A total of 68.0% of survey respondents do not routinely use stroke risk scores in critically ill patients with new-onset AF. A total of 85.4% of participants would consider taking part in a clinical trial investigating treatment of new-onset fast AF in the critically ill. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest a considerable disparity between contemporary practice of management of new-onset AF in critical illness and treatment recommendations for the general patient population suffering from AF, particularly with regard to anti-arrhythmics and anti-coagulation used. Amongst intensivists, there is a substantial interest in research for management of new-onset AF in critically ill patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5592903 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55929032017-09-19 Current practice in the management of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: a UK-wide survey Chean, Chung Shen McAuley, Daniel Gordon, Anthony Welters, Ingeborg Dorothea PeerJ Anaesthesiology and Pain Management BACKGROUND: New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in critically ill patients. Although evidence base and expert consensus opinion for management have been summarised in several international guidelines, no specific considerations for critically ill patients have been included. We aimed to establish current practice of management of critically ill patients with new-onset AF. METHODS: We designed a short user-friendly online questionnaire. All members of the Intensive Care Society were invited via email containing a link to the questionnaire, which comprised 21 questions. The online survey was conducted between November 2016 and December 2016. RESULTS: The response rate was 397/3152 (12.6%). The majority of respondents (81.1%) worked in mixed Intensive Care Units and were consultants (71.8%). Most respondents (39.5%) would start intervention on patients with fast new-onset AF and stable blood pressure at a heart rate between 120 and 139 beats/min. However, 34.8% of participants would treat all patients who developed new-onset fast AF. Amiodarone and beta-blockers (80.9% and 11.6% of answers) were the most commonly used anti-arrhythmics. A total of 63.8% of respondents do not regularly anti-coagulate critically ill patients with new-onset fast AF, while 30.8% anti-coagulate within 72 hours. A total of 68.0% of survey respondents do not routinely use stroke risk scores in critically ill patients with new-onset AF. A total of 85.4% of participants would consider taking part in a clinical trial investigating treatment of new-onset fast AF in the critically ill. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest a considerable disparity between contemporary practice of management of new-onset AF in critical illness and treatment recommendations for the general patient population suffering from AF, particularly with regard to anti-arrhythmics and anti-coagulation used. Amongst intensivists, there is a substantial interest in research for management of new-onset AF in critically ill patients. PeerJ Inc. 2017-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5592903/ /pubmed/28929012 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3716 Text en ©2017 Chean et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Anaesthesiology and Pain Management Chean, Chung Shen McAuley, Daniel Gordon, Anthony Welters, Ingeborg Dorothea Current practice in the management of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: a UK-wide survey |
title | Current practice in the management of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: a UK-wide survey |
title_full | Current practice in the management of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: a UK-wide survey |
title_fullStr | Current practice in the management of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: a UK-wide survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Current practice in the management of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: a UK-wide survey |
title_short | Current practice in the management of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: a UK-wide survey |
title_sort | current practice in the management of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: a uk-wide survey |
topic | Anaesthesiology and Pain Management |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5592903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28929012 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3716 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cheanchungshen currentpracticeinthemanagementofnewonsetatrialfibrillationincriticallyillpatientsaukwidesurvey AT mcauleydaniel currentpracticeinthemanagementofnewonsetatrialfibrillationincriticallyillpatientsaukwidesurvey AT gordonanthony currentpracticeinthemanagementofnewonsetatrialfibrillationincriticallyillpatientsaukwidesurvey AT weltersingeborgdorothea currentpracticeinthemanagementofnewonsetatrialfibrillationincriticallyillpatientsaukwidesurvey |