Cargando…

Current practice in the management of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: a UK-wide survey

BACKGROUND: New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in critically ill patients. Although evidence base and expert consensus opinion for management have been summarised in several international guidelines, no specific considerations for critically ill patients have been inclu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chean, Chung Shen, McAuley, Daniel, Gordon, Anthony, Welters, Ingeborg Dorothea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5592903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28929012
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3716
_version_ 1783262956402769920
author Chean, Chung Shen
McAuley, Daniel
Gordon, Anthony
Welters, Ingeborg Dorothea
author_facet Chean, Chung Shen
McAuley, Daniel
Gordon, Anthony
Welters, Ingeborg Dorothea
author_sort Chean, Chung Shen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in critically ill patients. Although evidence base and expert consensus opinion for management have been summarised in several international guidelines, no specific considerations for critically ill patients have been included. We aimed to establish current practice of management of critically ill patients with new-onset AF. METHODS: We designed a short user-friendly online questionnaire. All members of the Intensive Care Society were invited via email containing a link to the questionnaire, which comprised 21 questions. The online survey was conducted between November 2016 and December 2016. RESULTS: The response rate was 397/3152 (12.6%). The majority of respondents (81.1%) worked in mixed Intensive Care Units and were consultants (71.8%). Most respondents (39.5%) would start intervention on patients with fast new-onset AF and stable blood pressure at a heart rate between 120 and 139 beats/min. However, 34.8% of participants would treat all patients who developed new-onset fast AF. Amiodarone and beta-blockers (80.9% and 11.6% of answers) were the most commonly used anti-arrhythmics. A total of 63.8% of respondents do not regularly anti-coagulate critically ill patients with new-onset fast AF, while 30.8% anti-coagulate within 72 hours. A total of 68.0% of survey respondents do not routinely use stroke risk scores in critically ill patients with new-onset AF. A total of 85.4% of participants would consider taking part in a clinical trial investigating treatment of new-onset fast AF in the critically ill. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest a considerable disparity between contemporary practice of management of new-onset AF in critical illness and treatment recommendations for the general patient population suffering from AF, particularly with regard to anti-arrhythmics and anti-coagulation used. Amongst intensivists, there is a substantial interest in research for management of new-onset AF in critically ill patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5592903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55929032017-09-19 Current practice in the management of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: a UK-wide survey Chean, Chung Shen McAuley, Daniel Gordon, Anthony Welters, Ingeborg Dorothea PeerJ Anaesthesiology and Pain Management BACKGROUND: New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in critically ill patients. Although evidence base and expert consensus opinion for management have been summarised in several international guidelines, no specific considerations for critically ill patients have been included. We aimed to establish current practice of management of critically ill patients with new-onset AF. METHODS: We designed a short user-friendly online questionnaire. All members of the Intensive Care Society were invited via email containing a link to the questionnaire, which comprised 21 questions. The online survey was conducted between November 2016 and December 2016. RESULTS: The response rate was 397/3152 (12.6%). The majority of respondents (81.1%) worked in mixed Intensive Care Units and were consultants (71.8%). Most respondents (39.5%) would start intervention on patients with fast new-onset AF and stable blood pressure at a heart rate between 120 and 139 beats/min. However, 34.8% of participants would treat all patients who developed new-onset fast AF. Amiodarone and beta-blockers (80.9% and 11.6% of answers) were the most commonly used anti-arrhythmics. A total of 63.8% of respondents do not regularly anti-coagulate critically ill patients with new-onset fast AF, while 30.8% anti-coagulate within 72 hours. A total of 68.0% of survey respondents do not routinely use stroke risk scores in critically ill patients with new-onset AF. A total of 85.4% of participants would consider taking part in a clinical trial investigating treatment of new-onset fast AF in the critically ill. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest a considerable disparity between contemporary practice of management of new-onset AF in critical illness and treatment recommendations for the general patient population suffering from AF, particularly with regard to anti-arrhythmics and anti-coagulation used. Amongst intensivists, there is a substantial interest in research for management of new-onset AF in critically ill patients. PeerJ Inc. 2017-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5592903/ /pubmed/28929012 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3716 Text en ©2017 Chean et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Anaesthesiology and Pain Management
Chean, Chung Shen
McAuley, Daniel
Gordon, Anthony
Welters, Ingeborg Dorothea
Current practice in the management of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: a UK-wide survey
title Current practice in the management of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: a UK-wide survey
title_full Current practice in the management of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: a UK-wide survey
title_fullStr Current practice in the management of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: a UK-wide survey
title_full_unstemmed Current practice in the management of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: a UK-wide survey
title_short Current practice in the management of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: a UK-wide survey
title_sort current practice in the management of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: a uk-wide survey
topic Anaesthesiology and Pain Management
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5592903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28929012
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3716
work_keys_str_mv AT cheanchungshen currentpracticeinthemanagementofnewonsetatrialfibrillationincriticallyillpatientsaukwidesurvey
AT mcauleydaniel currentpracticeinthemanagementofnewonsetatrialfibrillationincriticallyillpatientsaukwidesurvey
AT gordonanthony currentpracticeinthemanagementofnewonsetatrialfibrillationincriticallyillpatientsaukwidesurvey
AT weltersingeborgdorothea currentpracticeinthemanagementofnewonsetatrialfibrillationincriticallyillpatientsaukwidesurvey