Cargando…

Extended infusion versus intermittent infusion of imipenem in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia

BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation support can be the main source of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). VAP is a serious infection that may be associated with dangerous gram-negative bacteria mainly, and it leads to an increase in the mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). Imipenem is one o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ibrahim, Mohamed M, Tammam, Tarek Fouad, Ebaed, Mohy El Deen, Sarhan, Hatem A, Gad, Gamal F, Hussein, Amal K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5593413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28919718
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S143021
_version_ 1783263029910044672
author Ibrahim, Mohamed M
Tammam, Tarek Fouad
Ebaed, Mohy El Deen
Sarhan, Hatem A
Gad, Gamal F
Hussein, Amal K
author_facet Ibrahim, Mohamed M
Tammam, Tarek Fouad
Ebaed, Mohy El Deen
Sarhan, Hatem A
Gad, Gamal F
Hussein, Amal K
author_sort Ibrahim, Mohamed M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation support can be the main source of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). VAP is a serious infection that may be associated with dangerous gram-negative bacteria mainly, and it leads to an increase in the mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). Imipenem is one of the strongest antibiotics now available for treating VAP which is associated with gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, and it belongs to beta-lactam antibiotic group (carbapenem). OBJECTIVE: This study tried to investigate the efficacy of imipenem against VAP when it was infused within 180 min versus the efficacy when it was infused within 30–60 min. SETTING: This study was conducted in main ICU in general hospital which consists of surgical and medical beds within 2 years. One hundred and eighty-seven patients were enrolled on it. METHOD: This study is a retrospective cohort which was conducted within 2 years. The efficacy of imipenem which was administered by intermittent infusion (30–60 min) within first year was compared with the efficacy of imipenem which was administered by extended infusion (180 min) within second year in the field of VAP curing and cost reduction. All data were collected retrospectively from patient medical files and were statistically analyzed by SPSS version 20. MAIN OUTCOME: The study was designed to measure clinical and cost reduction outcomes, mortality and hospital stay. RESULTS: The results indicated that there is a significant decrease in mortality, number of recurrent infection, and ICU stay length, and the number of mechanical ventilator days was associated with extended imipenem infusion during the second year of the study. CONCLUSION: The use of imipenem with extended infusion over 3 hours enhances its clinical outcomes in the treatment of VAP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5593413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55934132017-09-15 Extended infusion versus intermittent infusion of imipenem in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia Ibrahim, Mohamed M Tammam, Tarek Fouad Ebaed, Mohy El Deen Sarhan, Hatem A Gad, Gamal F Hussein, Amal K Drug Des Devel Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation support can be the main source of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). VAP is a serious infection that may be associated with dangerous gram-negative bacteria mainly, and it leads to an increase in the mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). Imipenem is one of the strongest antibiotics now available for treating VAP which is associated with gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, and it belongs to beta-lactam antibiotic group (carbapenem). OBJECTIVE: This study tried to investigate the efficacy of imipenem against VAP when it was infused within 180 min versus the efficacy when it was infused within 30–60 min. SETTING: This study was conducted in main ICU in general hospital which consists of surgical and medical beds within 2 years. One hundred and eighty-seven patients were enrolled on it. METHOD: This study is a retrospective cohort which was conducted within 2 years. The efficacy of imipenem which was administered by intermittent infusion (30–60 min) within first year was compared with the efficacy of imipenem which was administered by extended infusion (180 min) within second year in the field of VAP curing and cost reduction. All data were collected retrospectively from patient medical files and were statistically analyzed by SPSS version 20. MAIN OUTCOME: The study was designed to measure clinical and cost reduction outcomes, mortality and hospital stay. RESULTS: The results indicated that there is a significant decrease in mortality, number of recurrent infection, and ICU stay length, and the number of mechanical ventilator days was associated with extended imipenem infusion during the second year of the study. CONCLUSION: The use of imipenem with extended infusion over 3 hours enhances its clinical outcomes in the treatment of VAP. Dove Medical Press 2017-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5593413/ /pubmed/28919718 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S143021 Text en © 2017 Ibrahim et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ibrahim, Mohamed M
Tammam, Tarek Fouad
Ebaed, Mohy El Deen
Sarhan, Hatem A
Gad, Gamal F
Hussein, Amal K
Extended infusion versus intermittent infusion of imipenem in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia
title Extended infusion versus intermittent infusion of imipenem in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia
title_full Extended infusion versus intermittent infusion of imipenem in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia
title_fullStr Extended infusion versus intermittent infusion of imipenem in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia
title_full_unstemmed Extended infusion versus intermittent infusion of imipenem in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia
title_short Extended infusion versus intermittent infusion of imipenem in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia
title_sort extended infusion versus intermittent infusion of imipenem in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5593413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28919718
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S143021
work_keys_str_mv AT ibrahimmohamedm extendedinfusionversusintermittentinfusionofimipeneminthetreatmentofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT tammamtarekfouad extendedinfusionversusintermittentinfusionofimipeneminthetreatmentofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT ebaedmohyeldeen extendedinfusionversusintermittentinfusionofimipeneminthetreatmentofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT sarhanhatema extendedinfusionversusintermittentinfusionofimipeneminthetreatmentofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT gadgamalf extendedinfusionversusintermittentinfusionofimipeneminthetreatmentofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT husseinamalk extendedinfusionversusintermittentinfusionofimipeneminthetreatmentofventilatorassociatedpneumonia