Cargando…
Building test data from real outbreaks for evaluating detection algorithms
Benchmarking surveillance systems requires realistic simulations of disease outbreaks. However, obtaining these data in sufficient quantity, with a realistic shape and covering a sufficient range of agents, size and duration, is known to be very difficult. The dataset of outbreak signals generated s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5593515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28863159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183992 |
_version_ | 1783263051264294912 |
---|---|
author | Texier, Gaetan Jackson, Michael L. Siwe, Leonel Meynard, Jean-Baptiste Deparis, Xavier Chaudet, Herve |
author_facet | Texier, Gaetan Jackson, Michael L. Siwe, Leonel Meynard, Jean-Baptiste Deparis, Xavier Chaudet, Herve |
author_sort | Texier, Gaetan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Benchmarking surveillance systems requires realistic simulations of disease outbreaks. However, obtaining these data in sufficient quantity, with a realistic shape and covering a sufficient range of agents, size and duration, is known to be very difficult. The dataset of outbreak signals generated should reflect the likely distribution of authentic situations faced by the surveillance system, including very unlikely outbreak signals. We propose and evaluate a new approach based on the use of historical outbreak data to simulate tailored outbreak signals. The method relies on a homothetic transformation of the historical distribution followed by resampling processes (Binomial, Inverse Transform Sampling Method—ITSM, Metropolis-Hasting Random Walk, Metropolis-Hasting Independent, Gibbs Sampler, Hybrid Gibbs Sampler). We carried out an analysis to identify the most important input parameters for simulation quality and to evaluate performance for each of the resampling algorithms. Our analysis confirms the influence of the type of algorithm used and simulation parameters (i.e. days, number of cases, outbreak shape, overall scale factor) on the results. We show that, regardless of the outbreaks, algorithms and metrics chosen for the evaluation, simulation quality decreased with the increase in the number of days simulated and increased with the number of cases simulated. Simulating outbreaks with fewer cases than days of duration (i.e. overall scale factor less than 1) resulted in an important loss of information during the simulation. We found that Gibbs sampling with a shrinkage procedure provides a good balance between accuracy and data dependency. If dependency is of little importance, binomial and ITSM methods are accurate. Given the constraint of keeping the simulation within a range of plausible epidemiological curves faced by the surveillance system, our study confirms that our approach can be used to generate a large spectrum of outbreak signals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5593515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55935152017-09-15 Building test data from real outbreaks for evaluating detection algorithms Texier, Gaetan Jackson, Michael L. Siwe, Leonel Meynard, Jean-Baptiste Deparis, Xavier Chaudet, Herve PLoS One Research Article Benchmarking surveillance systems requires realistic simulations of disease outbreaks. However, obtaining these data in sufficient quantity, with a realistic shape and covering a sufficient range of agents, size and duration, is known to be very difficult. The dataset of outbreak signals generated should reflect the likely distribution of authentic situations faced by the surveillance system, including very unlikely outbreak signals. We propose and evaluate a new approach based on the use of historical outbreak data to simulate tailored outbreak signals. The method relies on a homothetic transformation of the historical distribution followed by resampling processes (Binomial, Inverse Transform Sampling Method—ITSM, Metropolis-Hasting Random Walk, Metropolis-Hasting Independent, Gibbs Sampler, Hybrid Gibbs Sampler). We carried out an analysis to identify the most important input parameters for simulation quality and to evaluate performance for each of the resampling algorithms. Our analysis confirms the influence of the type of algorithm used and simulation parameters (i.e. days, number of cases, outbreak shape, overall scale factor) on the results. We show that, regardless of the outbreaks, algorithms and metrics chosen for the evaluation, simulation quality decreased with the increase in the number of days simulated and increased with the number of cases simulated. Simulating outbreaks with fewer cases than days of duration (i.e. overall scale factor less than 1) resulted in an important loss of information during the simulation. We found that Gibbs sampling with a shrinkage procedure provides a good balance between accuracy and data dependency. If dependency is of little importance, binomial and ITSM methods are accurate. Given the constraint of keeping the simulation within a range of plausible epidemiological curves faced by the surveillance system, our study confirms that our approach can be used to generate a large spectrum of outbreak signals. Public Library of Science 2017-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5593515/ /pubmed/28863159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183992 Text en © 2017 Texier et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Texier, Gaetan Jackson, Michael L. Siwe, Leonel Meynard, Jean-Baptiste Deparis, Xavier Chaudet, Herve Building test data from real outbreaks for evaluating detection algorithms |
title | Building test data from real outbreaks for evaluating detection algorithms |
title_full | Building test data from real outbreaks for evaluating detection algorithms |
title_fullStr | Building test data from real outbreaks for evaluating detection algorithms |
title_full_unstemmed | Building test data from real outbreaks for evaluating detection algorithms |
title_short | Building test data from real outbreaks for evaluating detection algorithms |
title_sort | building test data from real outbreaks for evaluating detection algorithms |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5593515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28863159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183992 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT texiergaetan buildingtestdatafromrealoutbreaksforevaluatingdetectionalgorithms AT jacksonmichaell buildingtestdatafromrealoutbreaksforevaluatingdetectionalgorithms AT siweleonel buildingtestdatafromrealoutbreaksforevaluatingdetectionalgorithms AT meynardjeanbaptiste buildingtestdatafromrealoutbreaksforevaluatingdetectionalgorithms AT deparisxavier buildingtestdatafromrealoutbreaksforevaluatingdetectionalgorithms AT chaudetherve buildingtestdatafromrealoutbreaksforevaluatingdetectionalgorithms |