Cargando…

Expanded Gene Panel Use for Women With Breast Cancer: Identification and Intervention Beyond Breast Cancer Risk

BACKGROUND: Clinicians ordering multi-gene next-generation sequencing panels for hereditary breast cancer risk have a variety of test panel options. Many panels include lesser known breast cancer genes or genes associated with other cancers. The authors hypothesized that using broader gene panels in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Leary, Erin, Iacoboni, Daniela, Holle, Jennifer, Michalski, Scott T., Esplin, Edward D., Yang, Shan, Ouyang, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28766213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5963-7
_version_ 1783263149341802496
author O’Leary, Erin
Iacoboni, Daniela
Holle, Jennifer
Michalski, Scott T.
Esplin, Edward D.
Yang, Shan
Ouyang, Karen
author_facet O’Leary, Erin
Iacoboni, Daniela
Holle, Jennifer
Michalski, Scott T.
Esplin, Edward D.
Yang, Shan
Ouyang, Karen
author_sort O’Leary, Erin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinicians ordering multi-gene next-generation sequencing panels for hereditary breast cancer risk have a variety of test panel options. Many panels include lesser known breast cancer genes or genes associated with other cancers. The authors hypothesized that using broader gene panels increases the identification of clinically significant findings, some relevant and others incidental to the testing indication. They examined clinician ordering patterns and compared the yield of pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in non-BRCA genes of female breast cancer patients. METHODS: This study analyzed de-identified personal and family histories in 1085 breast cancer cases with P/LP multi-gene panel findings in non-BRCA cancer genes and sorted them into three groups by the panel used for testing: group A (breast cancer genes only), group B (commonly assessed cancers: breast, gynecologic, and gastrointestinal), and group C (a more expanded set of tumors). The frequency of P/LP variants in genes with established management guidelines was compared and evaluated for consistency with personal and family histories. RESULTS: This study identified 1131 P/LP variants and compared variants in clinically actionable genes for breast and non-breast cancers. Overall, 91.5% of these variants were in genes with management guidelines. Nearly 12% were unrelated to personal or family history. CONCLUSION: Broader panels were used for 85.6% of our cohort (groups B and C). Although pathogenic variants in non-BRCA genes are reportedly rare, the study found that most were in clinically actionable genes. Expanded panel testing improved the identification of hereditary cancer risk. Small, breast-limited panels may miss clinically relevant findings in genes associated with other heritable cancers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1245/s10434-017-5963-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5594040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55940402017-09-26 Expanded Gene Panel Use for Women With Breast Cancer: Identification and Intervention Beyond Breast Cancer Risk O’Leary, Erin Iacoboni, Daniela Holle, Jennifer Michalski, Scott T. Esplin, Edward D. Yang, Shan Ouyang, Karen Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology BACKGROUND: Clinicians ordering multi-gene next-generation sequencing panels for hereditary breast cancer risk have a variety of test panel options. Many panels include lesser known breast cancer genes or genes associated with other cancers. The authors hypothesized that using broader gene panels increases the identification of clinically significant findings, some relevant and others incidental to the testing indication. They examined clinician ordering patterns and compared the yield of pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in non-BRCA genes of female breast cancer patients. METHODS: This study analyzed de-identified personal and family histories in 1085 breast cancer cases with P/LP multi-gene panel findings in non-BRCA cancer genes and sorted them into three groups by the panel used for testing: group A (breast cancer genes only), group B (commonly assessed cancers: breast, gynecologic, and gastrointestinal), and group C (a more expanded set of tumors). The frequency of P/LP variants in genes with established management guidelines was compared and evaluated for consistency with personal and family histories. RESULTS: This study identified 1131 P/LP variants and compared variants in clinically actionable genes for breast and non-breast cancers. Overall, 91.5% of these variants were in genes with management guidelines. Nearly 12% were unrelated to personal or family history. CONCLUSION: Broader panels were used for 85.6% of our cohort (groups B and C). Although pathogenic variants in non-BRCA genes are reportedly rare, the study found that most were in clinically actionable genes. Expanded panel testing improved the identification of hereditary cancer risk. Small, breast-limited panels may miss clinically relevant findings in genes associated with other heritable cancers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1245/s10434-017-5963-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-08-01 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5594040/ /pubmed/28766213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5963-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Breast Oncology
O’Leary, Erin
Iacoboni, Daniela
Holle, Jennifer
Michalski, Scott T.
Esplin, Edward D.
Yang, Shan
Ouyang, Karen
Expanded Gene Panel Use for Women With Breast Cancer: Identification and Intervention Beyond Breast Cancer Risk
title Expanded Gene Panel Use for Women With Breast Cancer: Identification and Intervention Beyond Breast Cancer Risk
title_full Expanded Gene Panel Use for Women With Breast Cancer: Identification and Intervention Beyond Breast Cancer Risk
title_fullStr Expanded Gene Panel Use for Women With Breast Cancer: Identification and Intervention Beyond Breast Cancer Risk
title_full_unstemmed Expanded Gene Panel Use for Women With Breast Cancer: Identification and Intervention Beyond Breast Cancer Risk
title_short Expanded Gene Panel Use for Women With Breast Cancer: Identification and Intervention Beyond Breast Cancer Risk
title_sort expanded gene panel use for women with breast cancer: identification and intervention beyond breast cancer risk
topic Breast Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28766213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5963-7
work_keys_str_mv AT olearyerin expandedgenepaneluseforwomenwithbreastcanceridentificationandinterventionbeyondbreastcancerrisk
AT iacobonidaniela expandedgenepaneluseforwomenwithbreastcanceridentificationandinterventionbeyondbreastcancerrisk
AT hollejennifer expandedgenepaneluseforwomenwithbreastcanceridentificationandinterventionbeyondbreastcancerrisk
AT michalskiscottt expandedgenepaneluseforwomenwithbreastcanceridentificationandinterventionbeyondbreastcancerrisk
AT esplinedwardd expandedgenepaneluseforwomenwithbreastcanceridentificationandinterventionbeyondbreastcancerrisk
AT yangshan expandedgenepaneluseforwomenwithbreastcanceridentificationandinterventionbeyondbreastcancerrisk
AT ouyangkaren expandedgenepaneluseforwomenwithbreastcanceridentificationandinterventionbeyondbreastcancerrisk