Cargando…
Effectiveness of befriending interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: Befriending is an emotional supportive relationship in which one-to-one companionship is provided on a regular basis by a volunteer. It is commonly and increasingly offered by the voluntary sector for individuals with distressing physical and mental conditions. However, the effectiveness...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Open
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28446525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014304 |
_version_ | 1783263166535303168 |
---|---|
author | Siette, Joyce Cassidy, Megan Priebe, Stefan |
author_facet | Siette, Joyce Cassidy, Megan Priebe, Stefan |
author_sort | Siette, Joyce |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Befriending is an emotional supportive relationship in which one-to-one companionship is provided on a regular basis by a volunteer. It is commonly and increasingly offered by the voluntary sector for individuals with distressing physical and mental conditions. However, the effectiveness of this intervention on health outcomes is largely unknown. We aim to conduct a systematic review of the benefits of befriending. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental trials of befriending for a range of physical and mental health indications including depression, anxiety, mental illness, cancer, physical illness and dementia. Main outcomes included patient-relevant and disease-specific outcomes, such as depression, loneliness, quality of life, self-esteem, social support and well-being. RESULTS: A total of 14 trials (2411 participants) were included; 7 were judged at low risk of bias. Most trials showed improvement in symptoms associated with befriending but these associations did not reach statistical significance in all trials. Befriending was significantly associated with better patient-reported outcomes across primary measures (standardised mean difference 0.18 (95% CI, −0.002 to 0.36, I(2)=26%, seven trials)). However, there was no significant benefit on single outcomes, including depression, quality of life, loneliness ratings, self-esteem measures, social support structures and well-being. CONCLUSIONS: There was moderate quality evidence to support the use of befriending for the treatment of individuals with different physical and mental health conditions. This evidence refers to an overall improvement benefit in patient-reported primary outcomes, although with a rather small effect size. The current evidence base does not allow for firm conclusions on more specific outcomes. Future trials should hypothesise a model for the precise effects of befriending and use specified inclusion and outcome criteria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5594212 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55942122017-09-14 Effectiveness of befriending interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis Siette, Joyce Cassidy, Megan Priebe, Stefan BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVE: Befriending is an emotional supportive relationship in which one-to-one companionship is provided on a regular basis by a volunteer. It is commonly and increasingly offered by the voluntary sector for individuals with distressing physical and mental conditions. However, the effectiveness of this intervention on health outcomes is largely unknown. We aim to conduct a systematic review of the benefits of befriending. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental trials of befriending for a range of physical and mental health indications including depression, anxiety, mental illness, cancer, physical illness and dementia. Main outcomes included patient-relevant and disease-specific outcomes, such as depression, loneliness, quality of life, self-esteem, social support and well-being. RESULTS: A total of 14 trials (2411 participants) were included; 7 were judged at low risk of bias. Most trials showed improvement in symptoms associated with befriending but these associations did not reach statistical significance in all trials. Befriending was significantly associated with better patient-reported outcomes across primary measures (standardised mean difference 0.18 (95% CI, −0.002 to 0.36, I(2)=26%, seven trials)). However, there was no significant benefit on single outcomes, including depression, quality of life, loneliness ratings, self-esteem measures, social support structures and well-being. CONCLUSIONS: There was moderate quality evidence to support the use of befriending for the treatment of individuals with different physical and mental health conditions. This evidence refers to an overall improvement benefit in patient-reported primary outcomes, although with a rather small effect size. The current evidence base does not allow for firm conclusions on more specific outcomes. Future trials should hypothesise a model for the precise effects of befriending and use specified inclusion and outcome criteria. BMJ Open 2017-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5594212/ /pubmed/28446525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014304 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Siette, Joyce Cassidy, Megan Priebe, Stefan Effectiveness of befriending interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Effectiveness of befriending interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Effectiveness of befriending interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of befriending interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of befriending interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Effectiveness of befriending interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | effectiveness of befriending interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28446525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014304 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT siettejoyce effectivenessofbefriendinginterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cassidymegan effectivenessofbefriendinginterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT priebestefan effectivenessofbefriendinginterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |