Cargando…

Combining SPECT and Quantitative EEG Analysis for the Automated Differential Diagnosis of Disorders with Amnestic Symptoms

Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and Electroencephalography (EEG) have become established tools in routine diagnostics of dementia. We aimed to increase the diagnostic power by combining quantitative markers from SPECT and EEG for differential diagnosis of disorders with amnestic s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Höller, Yvonne, Bathke, Arne C., Uhl, Andreas, Strobl, Nicolas, Lang, Adelheid, Bergmann, Jürgen, Nardone, Raffaele, Rossini, Fabio, Zauner, Harald, Kirschner, Margarita, Jahanbekam, Amirhossein, Trinka, Eugen, Staffen, Wolfgang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28936173
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00290
_version_ 1783263169244823552
author Höller, Yvonne
Bathke, Arne C.
Uhl, Andreas
Strobl, Nicolas
Lang, Adelheid
Bergmann, Jürgen
Nardone, Raffaele
Rossini, Fabio
Zauner, Harald
Kirschner, Margarita
Jahanbekam, Amirhossein
Trinka, Eugen
Staffen, Wolfgang
author_facet Höller, Yvonne
Bathke, Arne C.
Uhl, Andreas
Strobl, Nicolas
Lang, Adelheid
Bergmann, Jürgen
Nardone, Raffaele
Rossini, Fabio
Zauner, Harald
Kirschner, Margarita
Jahanbekam, Amirhossein
Trinka, Eugen
Staffen, Wolfgang
author_sort Höller, Yvonne
collection PubMed
description Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and Electroencephalography (EEG) have become established tools in routine diagnostics of dementia. We aimed to increase the diagnostic power by combining quantitative markers from SPECT and EEG for differential diagnosis of disorders with amnestic symptoms. We hypothesize that the combination of SPECT with measures of interaction (connectivity) in the EEG yields higher diagnostic accuracy than the single modalities. We examined 39 patients with Alzheimer's dementia (AD), 69 patients with depressive cognitive impairment (DCI), 71 patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and 41 patients with amnestic subjective cognitive complaints (aSCC). We calculated 14 measures of interaction from a standard clinical EEG-recording and derived graph-theoretic network measures. From regional brain perfusion measured by 99mTc-hexamethyl-propylene-aminoxime (HMPAO)-SPECT in 46 regions, we calculated relative cerebral perfusion in these patients. Patient groups were classified pairwise with a linear support vector machine. Classification was conducted separately for each biomarker, and then again for each EEG- biomarker combined with SPECT. Combination of SPECT with EEG-biomarkers outperformed single use of SPECT or EEG when classifying aSCC vs. AD (90%), aMCI vs. AD (70%), and AD vs. DCI (100%), while a selection of EEG measures performed best when classifying aSCC vs. aMCI (82%) and aMCI vs. DCI (90%). Only the contrast between aSCC and DCI did not result in above-chance classification accuracy (60%). In general, accuracies were higher when measures of interaction (i.e., connectivity measures) were applied directly than when graph-theoretical measures were derived. We suggest that quantitative analysis of EEG and machine-learning techniques can support differentiating AD, aMCI, aSCC, and DCC, especially when being combined with imaging methods such as SPECT. Quantitative analysis of EEG connectivity could become an integral part for early differential diagnosis of cognitive impairment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5594223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55942232017-09-21 Combining SPECT and Quantitative EEG Analysis for the Automated Differential Diagnosis of Disorders with Amnestic Symptoms Höller, Yvonne Bathke, Arne C. Uhl, Andreas Strobl, Nicolas Lang, Adelheid Bergmann, Jürgen Nardone, Raffaele Rossini, Fabio Zauner, Harald Kirschner, Margarita Jahanbekam, Amirhossein Trinka, Eugen Staffen, Wolfgang Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and Electroencephalography (EEG) have become established tools in routine diagnostics of dementia. We aimed to increase the diagnostic power by combining quantitative markers from SPECT and EEG for differential diagnosis of disorders with amnestic symptoms. We hypothesize that the combination of SPECT with measures of interaction (connectivity) in the EEG yields higher diagnostic accuracy than the single modalities. We examined 39 patients with Alzheimer's dementia (AD), 69 patients with depressive cognitive impairment (DCI), 71 patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and 41 patients with amnestic subjective cognitive complaints (aSCC). We calculated 14 measures of interaction from a standard clinical EEG-recording and derived graph-theoretic network measures. From regional brain perfusion measured by 99mTc-hexamethyl-propylene-aminoxime (HMPAO)-SPECT in 46 regions, we calculated relative cerebral perfusion in these patients. Patient groups were classified pairwise with a linear support vector machine. Classification was conducted separately for each biomarker, and then again for each EEG- biomarker combined with SPECT. Combination of SPECT with EEG-biomarkers outperformed single use of SPECT or EEG when classifying aSCC vs. AD (90%), aMCI vs. AD (70%), and AD vs. DCI (100%), while a selection of EEG measures performed best when classifying aSCC vs. aMCI (82%) and aMCI vs. DCI (90%). Only the contrast between aSCC and DCI did not result in above-chance classification accuracy (60%). In general, accuracies were higher when measures of interaction (i.e., connectivity measures) were applied directly than when graph-theoretical measures were derived. We suggest that quantitative analysis of EEG and machine-learning techniques can support differentiating AD, aMCI, aSCC, and DCC, especially when being combined with imaging methods such as SPECT. Quantitative analysis of EEG connectivity could become an integral part for early differential diagnosis of cognitive impairment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5594223/ /pubmed/28936173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00290 Text en Copyright © 2017 Höller, Bathke, Uhl, Strobl, Lang, Bergmann, Nardone, Rossini, Zauner, Kirschner, Jahanbekam, Trinka and Staffen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Höller, Yvonne
Bathke, Arne C.
Uhl, Andreas
Strobl, Nicolas
Lang, Adelheid
Bergmann, Jürgen
Nardone, Raffaele
Rossini, Fabio
Zauner, Harald
Kirschner, Margarita
Jahanbekam, Amirhossein
Trinka, Eugen
Staffen, Wolfgang
Combining SPECT and Quantitative EEG Analysis for the Automated Differential Diagnosis of Disorders with Amnestic Symptoms
title Combining SPECT and Quantitative EEG Analysis for the Automated Differential Diagnosis of Disorders with Amnestic Symptoms
title_full Combining SPECT and Quantitative EEG Analysis for the Automated Differential Diagnosis of Disorders with Amnestic Symptoms
title_fullStr Combining SPECT and Quantitative EEG Analysis for the Automated Differential Diagnosis of Disorders with Amnestic Symptoms
title_full_unstemmed Combining SPECT and Quantitative EEG Analysis for the Automated Differential Diagnosis of Disorders with Amnestic Symptoms
title_short Combining SPECT and Quantitative EEG Analysis for the Automated Differential Diagnosis of Disorders with Amnestic Symptoms
title_sort combining spect and quantitative eeg analysis for the automated differential diagnosis of disorders with amnestic symptoms
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28936173
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00290
work_keys_str_mv AT holleryvonne combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms
AT bathkearnec combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms
AT uhlandreas combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms
AT stroblnicolas combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms
AT langadelheid combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms
AT bergmannjurgen combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms
AT nardoneraffaele combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms
AT rossinifabio combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms
AT zaunerharald combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms
AT kirschnermargarita combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms
AT jahanbekamamirhossein combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms
AT trinkaeugen combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms
AT staffenwolfgang combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms