Cargando…
Combining SPECT and Quantitative EEG Analysis for the Automated Differential Diagnosis of Disorders with Amnestic Symptoms
Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and Electroencephalography (EEG) have become established tools in routine diagnostics of dementia. We aimed to increase the diagnostic power by combining quantitative markers from SPECT and EEG for differential diagnosis of disorders with amnestic s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28936173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00290 |
_version_ | 1783263169244823552 |
---|---|
author | Höller, Yvonne Bathke, Arne C. Uhl, Andreas Strobl, Nicolas Lang, Adelheid Bergmann, Jürgen Nardone, Raffaele Rossini, Fabio Zauner, Harald Kirschner, Margarita Jahanbekam, Amirhossein Trinka, Eugen Staffen, Wolfgang |
author_facet | Höller, Yvonne Bathke, Arne C. Uhl, Andreas Strobl, Nicolas Lang, Adelheid Bergmann, Jürgen Nardone, Raffaele Rossini, Fabio Zauner, Harald Kirschner, Margarita Jahanbekam, Amirhossein Trinka, Eugen Staffen, Wolfgang |
author_sort | Höller, Yvonne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and Electroencephalography (EEG) have become established tools in routine diagnostics of dementia. We aimed to increase the diagnostic power by combining quantitative markers from SPECT and EEG for differential diagnosis of disorders with amnestic symptoms. We hypothesize that the combination of SPECT with measures of interaction (connectivity) in the EEG yields higher diagnostic accuracy than the single modalities. We examined 39 patients with Alzheimer's dementia (AD), 69 patients with depressive cognitive impairment (DCI), 71 patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and 41 patients with amnestic subjective cognitive complaints (aSCC). We calculated 14 measures of interaction from a standard clinical EEG-recording and derived graph-theoretic network measures. From regional brain perfusion measured by 99mTc-hexamethyl-propylene-aminoxime (HMPAO)-SPECT in 46 regions, we calculated relative cerebral perfusion in these patients. Patient groups were classified pairwise with a linear support vector machine. Classification was conducted separately for each biomarker, and then again for each EEG- biomarker combined with SPECT. Combination of SPECT with EEG-biomarkers outperformed single use of SPECT or EEG when classifying aSCC vs. AD (90%), aMCI vs. AD (70%), and AD vs. DCI (100%), while a selection of EEG measures performed best when classifying aSCC vs. aMCI (82%) and aMCI vs. DCI (90%). Only the contrast between aSCC and DCI did not result in above-chance classification accuracy (60%). In general, accuracies were higher when measures of interaction (i.e., connectivity measures) were applied directly than when graph-theoretical measures were derived. We suggest that quantitative analysis of EEG and machine-learning techniques can support differentiating AD, aMCI, aSCC, and DCC, especially when being combined with imaging methods such as SPECT. Quantitative analysis of EEG connectivity could become an integral part for early differential diagnosis of cognitive impairment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5594223 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55942232017-09-21 Combining SPECT and Quantitative EEG Analysis for the Automated Differential Diagnosis of Disorders with Amnestic Symptoms Höller, Yvonne Bathke, Arne C. Uhl, Andreas Strobl, Nicolas Lang, Adelheid Bergmann, Jürgen Nardone, Raffaele Rossini, Fabio Zauner, Harald Kirschner, Margarita Jahanbekam, Amirhossein Trinka, Eugen Staffen, Wolfgang Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and Electroencephalography (EEG) have become established tools in routine diagnostics of dementia. We aimed to increase the diagnostic power by combining quantitative markers from SPECT and EEG for differential diagnosis of disorders with amnestic symptoms. We hypothesize that the combination of SPECT with measures of interaction (connectivity) in the EEG yields higher diagnostic accuracy than the single modalities. We examined 39 patients with Alzheimer's dementia (AD), 69 patients with depressive cognitive impairment (DCI), 71 patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and 41 patients with amnestic subjective cognitive complaints (aSCC). We calculated 14 measures of interaction from a standard clinical EEG-recording and derived graph-theoretic network measures. From regional brain perfusion measured by 99mTc-hexamethyl-propylene-aminoxime (HMPAO)-SPECT in 46 regions, we calculated relative cerebral perfusion in these patients. Patient groups were classified pairwise with a linear support vector machine. Classification was conducted separately for each biomarker, and then again for each EEG- biomarker combined with SPECT. Combination of SPECT with EEG-biomarkers outperformed single use of SPECT or EEG when classifying aSCC vs. AD (90%), aMCI vs. AD (70%), and AD vs. DCI (100%), while a selection of EEG measures performed best when classifying aSCC vs. aMCI (82%) and aMCI vs. DCI (90%). Only the contrast between aSCC and DCI did not result in above-chance classification accuracy (60%). In general, accuracies were higher when measures of interaction (i.e., connectivity measures) were applied directly than when graph-theoretical measures were derived. We suggest that quantitative analysis of EEG and machine-learning techniques can support differentiating AD, aMCI, aSCC, and DCC, especially when being combined with imaging methods such as SPECT. Quantitative analysis of EEG connectivity could become an integral part for early differential diagnosis of cognitive impairment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5594223/ /pubmed/28936173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00290 Text en Copyright © 2017 Höller, Bathke, Uhl, Strobl, Lang, Bergmann, Nardone, Rossini, Zauner, Kirschner, Jahanbekam, Trinka and Staffen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Höller, Yvonne Bathke, Arne C. Uhl, Andreas Strobl, Nicolas Lang, Adelheid Bergmann, Jürgen Nardone, Raffaele Rossini, Fabio Zauner, Harald Kirschner, Margarita Jahanbekam, Amirhossein Trinka, Eugen Staffen, Wolfgang Combining SPECT and Quantitative EEG Analysis for the Automated Differential Diagnosis of Disorders with Amnestic Symptoms |
title | Combining SPECT and Quantitative EEG Analysis for the Automated Differential Diagnosis of Disorders with Amnestic Symptoms |
title_full | Combining SPECT and Quantitative EEG Analysis for the Automated Differential Diagnosis of Disorders with Amnestic Symptoms |
title_fullStr | Combining SPECT and Quantitative EEG Analysis for the Automated Differential Diagnosis of Disorders with Amnestic Symptoms |
title_full_unstemmed | Combining SPECT and Quantitative EEG Analysis for the Automated Differential Diagnosis of Disorders with Amnestic Symptoms |
title_short | Combining SPECT and Quantitative EEG Analysis for the Automated Differential Diagnosis of Disorders with Amnestic Symptoms |
title_sort | combining spect and quantitative eeg analysis for the automated differential diagnosis of disorders with amnestic symptoms |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28936173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00290 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holleryvonne combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms AT bathkearnec combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms AT uhlandreas combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms AT stroblnicolas combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms AT langadelheid combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms AT bergmannjurgen combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms AT nardoneraffaele combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms AT rossinifabio combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms AT zaunerharald combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms AT kirschnermargarita combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms AT jahanbekamamirhossein combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms AT trinkaeugen combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms AT staffenwolfgang combiningspectandquantitativeeeganalysisfortheautomateddifferentialdiagnosisofdisorderswithamnesticsymptoms |