Cargando…

A conceptual framework to assess effectiveness in wheelchair provision

BACKGROUND: Currently, inadequate wheelchair provision has forced many people with disabilities to be trapped in a cycle of poverty and deprivation, limiting their ability to access education, work and social facilities. This issue is in part because of the lack of collaboration among various stakeh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamaraj, Deepan C., Bray, Nathan, Rispin, Karen, Kankipati, Padmaja, Pearlman, Jonathan, Borg, Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28936421
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v6i0.355
_version_ 1783263178092707840
author Kamaraj, Deepan C.
Bray, Nathan
Rispin, Karen
Kankipati, Padmaja
Pearlman, Jonathan
Borg, Johan
author_facet Kamaraj, Deepan C.
Bray, Nathan
Rispin, Karen
Kankipati, Padmaja
Pearlman, Jonathan
Borg, Johan
author_sort Kamaraj, Deepan C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, inadequate wheelchair provision has forced many people with disabilities to be trapped in a cycle of poverty and deprivation, limiting their ability to access education, work and social facilities. This issue is in part because of the lack of collaboration among various stakeholders who need to work together to design, manufacture and deliver such assistive mobility devices. This in turn has led to inadequate evidence about intervention effectiveness, disability prevalence and subsequent costeffectiveness that would help facilitate appropriate provision and support for people with disabilities. OBJECTIVES: In this paper, we describe a novel conceptual framework that can be tested across the globe to study and evaluate the effectiveness of wheelchair provision. METHOD: The Comparative Effectiveness Research Subcommittee (CER-SC), consisting of the authors of this article, housed within the Evidence-Based Practice Working Group (EBP-WG) of the International Society of Wheelchair Professionals (ISWP), conducted a scoping review of scientific literature and standard practices used during wheelchair service provision. The literature review was followed by a series of discussion groups. RESULTS: The three iterations of the conceptual framework are described in this manuscript. CONCLUSION: We believe that adoption of this conceptual framework could have broad applications in wheelchair provision globally to develop evidence-based practices. Such a perspective will help in the comparison of different strategies employed in wheelchair provision and further improve clinical guidelines. Further work is being conducted to test the efficacy of this conceptual framework to evaluate effectiveness of wheelchair service provision in various settings across the globe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5594267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55942672017-09-21 A conceptual framework to assess effectiveness in wheelchair provision Kamaraj, Deepan C. Bray, Nathan Rispin, Karen Kankipati, Padmaja Pearlman, Jonathan Borg, Johan Afr J Disabil Original Research BACKGROUND: Currently, inadequate wheelchair provision has forced many people with disabilities to be trapped in a cycle of poverty and deprivation, limiting their ability to access education, work and social facilities. This issue is in part because of the lack of collaboration among various stakeholders who need to work together to design, manufacture and deliver such assistive mobility devices. This in turn has led to inadequate evidence about intervention effectiveness, disability prevalence and subsequent costeffectiveness that would help facilitate appropriate provision and support for people with disabilities. OBJECTIVES: In this paper, we describe a novel conceptual framework that can be tested across the globe to study and evaluate the effectiveness of wheelchair provision. METHOD: The Comparative Effectiveness Research Subcommittee (CER-SC), consisting of the authors of this article, housed within the Evidence-Based Practice Working Group (EBP-WG) of the International Society of Wheelchair Professionals (ISWP), conducted a scoping review of scientific literature and standard practices used during wheelchair service provision. The literature review was followed by a series of discussion groups. RESULTS: The three iterations of the conceptual framework are described in this manuscript. CONCLUSION: We believe that adoption of this conceptual framework could have broad applications in wheelchair provision globally to develop evidence-based practices. Such a perspective will help in the comparison of different strategies employed in wheelchair provision and further improve clinical guidelines. Further work is being conducted to test the efficacy of this conceptual framework to evaluate effectiveness of wheelchair service provision in various settings across the globe. AOSIS 2017-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5594267/ /pubmed/28936421 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v6i0.355 Text en © 2017. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kamaraj, Deepan C.
Bray, Nathan
Rispin, Karen
Kankipati, Padmaja
Pearlman, Jonathan
Borg, Johan
A conceptual framework to assess effectiveness in wheelchair provision
title A conceptual framework to assess effectiveness in wheelchair provision
title_full A conceptual framework to assess effectiveness in wheelchair provision
title_fullStr A conceptual framework to assess effectiveness in wheelchair provision
title_full_unstemmed A conceptual framework to assess effectiveness in wheelchair provision
title_short A conceptual framework to assess effectiveness in wheelchair provision
title_sort conceptual framework to assess effectiveness in wheelchair provision
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28936421
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v6i0.355
work_keys_str_mv AT kamarajdeepanc aconceptualframeworktoassesseffectivenessinwheelchairprovision
AT braynathan aconceptualframeworktoassesseffectivenessinwheelchairprovision
AT rispinkaren aconceptualframeworktoassesseffectivenessinwheelchairprovision
AT kankipatipadmaja aconceptualframeworktoassesseffectivenessinwheelchairprovision
AT pearlmanjonathan aconceptualframeworktoassesseffectivenessinwheelchairprovision
AT borgjohan aconceptualframeworktoassesseffectivenessinwheelchairprovision
AT kamarajdeepanc conceptualframeworktoassesseffectivenessinwheelchairprovision
AT braynathan conceptualframeworktoassesseffectivenessinwheelchairprovision
AT rispinkaren conceptualframeworktoassesseffectivenessinwheelchairprovision
AT kankipatipadmaja conceptualframeworktoassesseffectivenessinwheelchairprovision
AT pearlmanjonathan conceptualframeworktoassesseffectivenessinwheelchairprovision
AT borgjohan conceptualframeworktoassesseffectivenessinwheelchairprovision