Cargando…
Methods for the field evaluation of quantitative G6PD diagnostics: a review
Individuals with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency are at risk of severe haemolysis following the administration of 8-aminoquinoline compounds. Primaquine is the only widely available 8-aminoquinoline for the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax. Tafenoquine is under development with t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28893237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-2017-3 |
_version_ | 1783263222426501120 |
---|---|
author | Ley, Benedikt Bancone, Germana von Seidlein, Lorenz Thriemer, Kamala Richards, Jack S. Domingo, Gonzalo J. Price, Ric N. |
author_facet | Ley, Benedikt Bancone, Germana von Seidlein, Lorenz Thriemer, Kamala Richards, Jack S. Domingo, Gonzalo J. Price, Ric N. |
author_sort | Ley, Benedikt |
collection | PubMed |
description | Individuals with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency are at risk of severe haemolysis following the administration of 8-aminoquinoline compounds. Primaquine is the only widely available 8-aminoquinoline for the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax. Tafenoquine is under development with the potential to simplify treatment regimens, but point-of-care (PoC) tests will be needed to provide quantitative measurement of G6PD activity prior to its administration. There is currently a lack of appropriate G6PD PoC tests, but a number of new tests are in development and are likely to enter the market in the coming years. As these are implemented, they will need to be validated in field studies. This article outlines the technical details for the field evaluation of novel quantitative G6PD diagnostics such as sample handling, reference testing and statistical analysis. Field evaluation is based on the comparison of paired samples, including one sample tested by the new assay at point of care and one sample tested by the gold-standard reference method, UV spectrophotometry in an established laboratory. Samples can be collected as capillary or venous blood; the existing literature suggests that potential differences in capillary or venous blood are unlikely to affect results substantially. The collection and storage of samples is critical to ensure preservation of enzyme activity, it is recommended that samples are stored at 4 °C and testing occurs within 4 days of collection. Test results can be visually presented as scatter plot, Bland–Altman plot, and a histogram of the G6PD activity distribution of the study population. Calculating the adjusted male median allows categorizing results according to G6PD activity to calculate standard performance indicators and to perform receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5594530 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55945302017-09-14 Methods for the field evaluation of quantitative G6PD diagnostics: a review Ley, Benedikt Bancone, Germana von Seidlein, Lorenz Thriemer, Kamala Richards, Jack S. Domingo, Gonzalo J. Price, Ric N. Malar J Review Individuals with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency are at risk of severe haemolysis following the administration of 8-aminoquinoline compounds. Primaquine is the only widely available 8-aminoquinoline for the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax. Tafenoquine is under development with the potential to simplify treatment regimens, but point-of-care (PoC) tests will be needed to provide quantitative measurement of G6PD activity prior to its administration. There is currently a lack of appropriate G6PD PoC tests, but a number of new tests are in development and are likely to enter the market in the coming years. As these are implemented, they will need to be validated in field studies. This article outlines the technical details for the field evaluation of novel quantitative G6PD diagnostics such as sample handling, reference testing and statistical analysis. Field evaluation is based on the comparison of paired samples, including one sample tested by the new assay at point of care and one sample tested by the gold-standard reference method, UV spectrophotometry in an established laboratory. Samples can be collected as capillary or venous blood; the existing literature suggests that potential differences in capillary or venous blood are unlikely to affect results substantially. The collection and storage of samples is critical to ensure preservation of enzyme activity, it is recommended that samples are stored at 4 °C and testing occurs within 4 days of collection. Test results can be visually presented as scatter plot, Bland–Altman plot, and a histogram of the G6PD activity distribution of the study population. Calculating the adjusted male median allows categorizing results according to G6PD activity to calculate standard performance indicators and to perform receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. BioMed Central 2017-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5594530/ /pubmed/28893237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-2017-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Ley, Benedikt Bancone, Germana von Seidlein, Lorenz Thriemer, Kamala Richards, Jack S. Domingo, Gonzalo J. Price, Ric N. Methods for the field evaluation of quantitative G6PD diagnostics: a review |
title | Methods for the field evaluation of quantitative G6PD diagnostics: a review |
title_full | Methods for the field evaluation of quantitative G6PD diagnostics: a review |
title_fullStr | Methods for the field evaluation of quantitative G6PD diagnostics: a review |
title_full_unstemmed | Methods for the field evaluation of quantitative G6PD diagnostics: a review |
title_short | Methods for the field evaluation of quantitative G6PD diagnostics: a review |
title_sort | methods for the field evaluation of quantitative g6pd diagnostics: a review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28893237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-2017-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leybenedikt methodsforthefieldevaluationofquantitativeg6pddiagnosticsareview AT banconegermana methodsforthefieldevaluationofquantitativeg6pddiagnosticsareview AT vonseidleinlorenz methodsforthefieldevaluationofquantitativeg6pddiagnosticsareview AT thriemerkamala methodsforthefieldevaluationofquantitativeg6pddiagnosticsareview AT richardsjacks methodsforthefieldevaluationofquantitativeg6pddiagnosticsareview AT domingogonzaloj methodsforthefieldevaluationofquantitativeg6pddiagnosticsareview AT pricericn methodsforthefieldevaluationofquantitativeg6pddiagnosticsareview |