Cargando…

Methods for the field evaluation of quantitative G6PD diagnostics: a review

Individuals with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency are at risk of severe haemolysis following the administration of 8-aminoquinoline compounds. Primaquine is the only widely available 8-aminoquinoline for the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax. Tafenoquine is under development with t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ley, Benedikt, Bancone, Germana, von Seidlein, Lorenz, Thriemer, Kamala, Richards, Jack S., Domingo, Gonzalo J., Price, Ric N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28893237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-2017-3
_version_ 1783263222426501120
author Ley, Benedikt
Bancone, Germana
von Seidlein, Lorenz
Thriemer, Kamala
Richards, Jack S.
Domingo, Gonzalo J.
Price, Ric N.
author_facet Ley, Benedikt
Bancone, Germana
von Seidlein, Lorenz
Thriemer, Kamala
Richards, Jack S.
Domingo, Gonzalo J.
Price, Ric N.
author_sort Ley, Benedikt
collection PubMed
description Individuals with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency are at risk of severe haemolysis following the administration of 8-aminoquinoline compounds. Primaquine is the only widely available 8-aminoquinoline for the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax. Tafenoquine is under development with the potential to simplify treatment regimens, but point-of-care (PoC) tests will be needed to provide quantitative measurement of G6PD activity prior to its administration. There is currently a lack of appropriate G6PD PoC tests, but a number of new tests are in development and are likely to enter the market in the coming years. As these are implemented, they will need to be validated in field studies. This article outlines the technical details for the field evaluation of novel quantitative G6PD diagnostics such as sample handling, reference testing and statistical analysis. Field evaluation is based on the comparison of paired samples, including one sample tested by the new assay at point of care and one sample tested by the gold-standard reference method, UV spectrophotometry in an established laboratory. Samples can be collected as capillary or venous blood; the existing literature suggests that potential differences in capillary or venous blood are unlikely to affect results substantially. The collection and storage of samples is critical to ensure preservation of enzyme activity, it is recommended that samples are stored at 4 °C and testing occurs within 4 days of collection. Test results can be visually presented as scatter plot, Bland–Altman plot, and a histogram of the G6PD activity distribution of the study population. Calculating the adjusted male median allows categorizing results according to G6PD activity to calculate standard performance indicators and to perform receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5594530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55945302017-09-14 Methods for the field evaluation of quantitative G6PD diagnostics: a review Ley, Benedikt Bancone, Germana von Seidlein, Lorenz Thriemer, Kamala Richards, Jack S. Domingo, Gonzalo J. Price, Ric N. Malar J Review Individuals with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency are at risk of severe haemolysis following the administration of 8-aminoquinoline compounds. Primaquine is the only widely available 8-aminoquinoline for the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax. Tafenoquine is under development with the potential to simplify treatment regimens, but point-of-care (PoC) tests will be needed to provide quantitative measurement of G6PD activity prior to its administration. There is currently a lack of appropriate G6PD PoC tests, but a number of new tests are in development and are likely to enter the market in the coming years. As these are implemented, they will need to be validated in field studies. This article outlines the technical details for the field evaluation of novel quantitative G6PD diagnostics such as sample handling, reference testing and statistical analysis. Field evaluation is based on the comparison of paired samples, including one sample tested by the new assay at point of care and one sample tested by the gold-standard reference method, UV spectrophotometry in an established laboratory. Samples can be collected as capillary or venous blood; the existing literature suggests that potential differences in capillary or venous blood are unlikely to affect results substantially. The collection and storage of samples is critical to ensure preservation of enzyme activity, it is recommended that samples are stored at 4 °C and testing occurs within 4 days of collection. Test results can be visually presented as scatter plot, Bland–Altman plot, and a histogram of the G6PD activity distribution of the study population. Calculating the adjusted male median allows categorizing results according to G6PD activity to calculate standard performance indicators and to perform receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. BioMed Central 2017-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5594530/ /pubmed/28893237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-2017-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Ley, Benedikt
Bancone, Germana
von Seidlein, Lorenz
Thriemer, Kamala
Richards, Jack S.
Domingo, Gonzalo J.
Price, Ric N.
Methods for the field evaluation of quantitative G6PD diagnostics: a review
title Methods for the field evaluation of quantitative G6PD diagnostics: a review
title_full Methods for the field evaluation of quantitative G6PD diagnostics: a review
title_fullStr Methods for the field evaluation of quantitative G6PD diagnostics: a review
title_full_unstemmed Methods for the field evaluation of quantitative G6PD diagnostics: a review
title_short Methods for the field evaluation of quantitative G6PD diagnostics: a review
title_sort methods for the field evaluation of quantitative g6pd diagnostics: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28893237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-2017-3
work_keys_str_mv AT leybenedikt methodsforthefieldevaluationofquantitativeg6pddiagnosticsareview
AT banconegermana methodsforthefieldevaluationofquantitativeg6pddiagnosticsareview
AT vonseidleinlorenz methodsforthefieldevaluationofquantitativeg6pddiagnosticsareview
AT thriemerkamala methodsforthefieldevaluationofquantitativeg6pddiagnosticsareview
AT richardsjacks methodsforthefieldevaluationofquantitativeg6pddiagnosticsareview
AT domingogonzaloj methodsforthefieldevaluationofquantitativeg6pddiagnosticsareview
AT pricericn methodsforthefieldevaluationofquantitativeg6pddiagnosticsareview