Cargando…

Preference for cesarean section in young nulligravid women in eight OECD countries and implications for reproductive health education

BACKGROUND: Efforts to reduce unnecessary Cesarean sections (CS) in high and middle income countries have focused on changing hospital cultures and policies, care provider attitudes and behaviors, and increasing women’s knowledge about the benefits of vaginal birth. These strategies have been largel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stoll, Kathrin H., Hauck, Yvonne L., Downe, Soo, Payne, Deborah, Hall, Wendy A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28893291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0354-x
_version_ 1783263229747658752
author Stoll, Kathrin H.
Hauck, Yvonne L.
Downe, Soo
Payne, Deborah
Hall, Wendy A.
author_facet Stoll, Kathrin H.
Hauck, Yvonne L.
Downe, Soo
Payne, Deborah
Hall, Wendy A.
author_sort Stoll, Kathrin H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Efforts to reduce unnecessary Cesarean sections (CS) in high and middle income countries have focused on changing hospital cultures and policies, care provider attitudes and behaviors, and increasing women’s knowledge about the benefits of vaginal birth. These strategies have been largely ineffective. Despite evidence that women have well-developed preferences for mode of delivery prior to conceiving their first child, few studies and no interventions have targeted the next generation of maternity care consumers. The objectives of the study were to identify how many women prefer Cesarean section in a hypothetical healthy pregnancy, why they prefer CS and whether women report knowledge gaps about pregnancy and childbirth that can inform educational interventions. METHODS: Data was collected via an online survey at colleges and universities in 8 OECD countries (Australia, Canada, Chile, England, Germany, Iceland, New Zealand, United States) in 2014/2015. Childless young men and women between 18 and 40 years of age who planned to have at least one child in the future were eligible to participate. The current analysis is focused on the attitudes of women (n = 3616); rates of CS preference across countries are compared, using a standardized cohort of women aged 18–25 years, who were born in the survey country and did not study health sciences (n = 1390). RESULTS: One in ten young women in our study preferred CS, ranging from 7.6% in Iceland to 18.4% in Australia. Fear of uncontrollable labor pain and fear of physical damage were primary reasons for preferring a CS. Both fear of childbirth and preferences for CS declined as the level of confidence in women’s knowledge of pregnancy and birth increased. CONCLUSION: Education sessions delivered online, through social media, and face-to-face using drama and stories told by peers (young women who have recently had babies) or celebrities could be designed to maximize young women’s capacity to understand the physiology of labor and birth, and the range of methods available to support them in coping with labor pain and to minimize invasive procedures, therefore reducing fear of pain, bodily damage, and loss of control. The most efficacious designs and content for such education for young women and girls remains to be tested in future studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5594573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55945732017-09-14 Preference for cesarean section in young nulligravid women in eight OECD countries and implications for reproductive health education Stoll, Kathrin H. Hauck, Yvonne L. Downe, Soo Payne, Deborah Hall, Wendy A. Reprod Health Research BACKGROUND: Efforts to reduce unnecessary Cesarean sections (CS) in high and middle income countries have focused on changing hospital cultures and policies, care provider attitudes and behaviors, and increasing women’s knowledge about the benefits of vaginal birth. These strategies have been largely ineffective. Despite evidence that women have well-developed preferences for mode of delivery prior to conceiving their first child, few studies and no interventions have targeted the next generation of maternity care consumers. The objectives of the study were to identify how many women prefer Cesarean section in a hypothetical healthy pregnancy, why they prefer CS and whether women report knowledge gaps about pregnancy and childbirth that can inform educational interventions. METHODS: Data was collected via an online survey at colleges and universities in 8 OECD countries (Australia, Canada, Chile, England, Germany, Iceland, New Zealand, United States) in 2014/2015. Childless young men and women between 18 and 40 years of age who planned to have at least one child in the future were eligible to participate. The current analysis is focused on the attitudes of women (n = 3616); rates of CS preference across countries are compared, using a standardized cohort of women aged 18–25 years, who were born in the survey country and did not study health sciences (n = 1390). RESULTS: One in ten young women in our study preferred CS, ranging from 7.6% in Iceland to 18.4% in Australia. Fear of uncontrollable labor pain and fear of physical damage were primary reasons for preferring a CS. Both fear of childbirth and preferences for CS declined as the level of confidence in women’s knowledge of pregnancy and birth increased. CONCLUSION: Education sessions delivered online, through social media, and face-to-face using drama and stories told by peers (young women who have recently had babies) or celebrities could be designed to maximize young women’s capacity to understand the physiology of labor and birth, and the range of methods available to support them in coping with labor pain and to minimize invasive procedures, therefore reducing fear of pain, bodily damage, and loss of control. The most efficacious designs and content for such education for young women and girls remains to be tested in future studies. BioMed Central 2017-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5594573/ /pubmed/28893291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0354-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Stoll, Kathrin H.
Hauck, Yvonne L.
Downe, Soo
Payne, Deborah
Hall, Wendy A.
Preference for cesarean section in young nulligravid women in eight OECD countries and implications for reproductive health education
title Preference for cesarean section in young nulligravid women in eight OECD countries and implications for reproductive health education
title_full Preference for cesarean section in young nulligravid women in eight OECD countries and implications for reproductive health education
title_fullStr Preference for cesarean section in young nulligravid women in eight OECD countries and implications for reproductive health education
title_full_unstemmed Preference for cesarean section in young nulligravid women in eight OECD countries and implications for reproductive health education
title_short Preference for cesarean section in young nulligravid women in eight OECD countries and implications for reproductive health education
title_sort preference for cesarean section in young nulligravid women in eight oecd countries and implications for reproductive health education
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28893291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0354-x
work_keys_str_mv AT stollkathrinh preferenceforcesareansectioninyoungnulligravidwomenineightoecdcountriesandimplicationsforreproductivehealtheducation
AT hauckyvonnel preferenceforcesareansectioninyoungnulligravidwomenineightoecdcountriesandimplicationsforreproductivehealtheducation
AT downesoo preferenceforcesareansectioninyoungnulligravidwomenineightoecdcountriesandimplicationsforreproductivehealtheducation
AT paynedeborah preferenceforcesareansectioninyoungnulligravidwomenineightoecdcountriesandimplicationsforreproductivehealtheducation
AT hallwendya preferenceforcesareansectioninyoungnulligravidwomenineightoecdcountriesandimplicationsforreproductivehealtheducation
AT preferenceforcesareansectioninyoungnulligravidwomenineightoecdcountriesandimplicationsforreproductivehealtheducation