Cargando…
Predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography intensity values
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) intensity values. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT cross-sectional images for 436 posterior mandibular implant sites were selected for th...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932139 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_14_17 |
_version_ | 1783263296349011968 |
---|---|
author | Alkhader, Mustafa Hudieb, Malik Khader, Yousef |
author_facet | Alkhader, Mustafa Hudieb, Malik Khader, Yousef |
author_sort | Alkhader, Mustafa |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) intensity values. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT cross-sectional images for 436 posterior mandibular implant sites were selected for the study. Using Invivo software (Anatomage, San Jose, California, USA), two observers classified the bone density into three categories: low, intermediate, and high, and CBCT intensity values were generated. RESULTS: Based on the consensus of the two observers, 15.6% of sites were of low bone density, 47.9% were of intermediate density, and 36.5% were of high density. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that CBCT intensity values had a high predictive power for predicting high density sites (area under the curve [AUC] =0.94, P < 0.005) and intermediate density sites (AUC = 0.81, P < 0.005). The best cut-off value for intensity to predict intermediate density sites was 218 (sensitivity = 0.77 and specificity = 0.76) and the best cut-off value for intensity to predict high density sites was 403 (sensitivity = 0.93 and specificity = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: CBCT intensity values are considered useful for predicting bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5594958 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55949582017-09-20 Predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography intensity values Alkhader, Mustafa Hudieb, Malik Khader, Yousef Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) intensity values. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT cross-sectional images for 436 posterior mandibular implant sites were selected for the study. Using Invivo software (Anatomage, San Jose, California, USA), two observers classified the bone density into three categories: low, intermediate, and high, and CBCT intensity values were generated. RESULTS: Based on the consensus of the two observers, 15.6% of sites were of low bone density, 47.9% were of intermediate density, and 36.5% were of high density. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that CBCT intensity values had a high predictive power for predicting high density sites (area under the curve [AUC] =0.94, P < 0.005) and intermediate density sites (AUC = 0.81, P < 0.005). The best cut-off value for intensity to predict intermediate density sites was 218 (sensitivity = 0.77 and specificity = 0.76) and the best cut-off value for intensity to predict high density sites was 403 (sensitivity = 0.93 and specificity = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: CBCT intensity values are considered useful for predicting bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5594958/ /pubmed/28932139 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_14_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Alkhader, Mustafa Hudieb, Malik Khader, Yousef Predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography intensity values |
title | Predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography intensity values |
title_full | Predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography intensity values |
title_fullStr | Predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography intensity values |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography intensity values |
title_short | Predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography intensity values |
title_sort | predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography intensity values |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932139 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_14_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alkhadermustafa predictabilityofbonedensityatposteriormandibularimplantsitesusingconebeamcomputedtomographyintensityvalues AT hudiebmalik predictabilityofbonedensityatposteriormandibularimplantsitesusingconebeamcomputedtomographyintensityvalues AT khaderyousef predictabilityofbonedensityatposteriormandibularimplantsitesusingconebeamcomputedtomographyintensityvalues |