Cargando…

Predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography intensity values

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) intensity values. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT cross-sectional images for 436 posterior mandibular implant sites were selected for th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alkhader, Mustafa, Hudieb, Malik, Khader, Yousef
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932139
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_14_17
_version_ 1783263296349011968
author Alkhader, Mustafa
Hudieb, Malik
Khader, Yousef
author_facet Alkhader, Mustafa
Hudieb, Malik
Khader, Yousef
author_sort Alkhader, Mustafa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) intensity values. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT cross-sectional images for 436 posterior mandibular implant sites were selected for the study. Using Invivo software (Anatomage, San Jose, California, USA), two observers classified the bone density into three categories: low, intermediate, and high, and CBCT intensity values were generated. RESULTS: Based on the consensus of the two observers, 15.6% of sites were of low bone density, 47.9% were of intermediate density, and 36.5% were of high density. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that CBCT intensity values had a high predictive power for predicting high density sites (area under the curve [AUC] =0.94, P < 0.005) and intermediate density sites (AUC = 0.81, P < 0.005). The best cut-off value for intensity to predict intermediate density sites was 218 (sensitivity = 0.77 and specificity = 0.76) and the best cut-off value for intensity to predict high density sites was 403 (sensitivity = 0.93 and specificity = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: CBCT intensity values are considered useful for predicting bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5594958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55949582017-09-20 Predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography intensity values Alkhader, Mustafa Hudieb, Malik Khader, Yousef Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) intensity values. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT cross-sectional images for 436 posterior mandibular implant sites were selected for the study. Using Invivo software (Anatomage, San Jose, California, USA), two observers classified the bone density into three categories: low, intermediate, and high, and CBCT intensity values were generated. RESULTS: Based on the consensus of the two observers, 15.6% of sites were of low bone density, 47.9% were of intermediate density, and 36.5% were of high density. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that CBCT intensity values had a high predictive power for predicting high density sites (area under the curve [AUC] =0.94, P < 0.005) and intermediate density sites (AUC = 0.81, P < 0.005). The best cut-off value for intensity to predict intermediate density sites was 218 (sensitivity = 0.77 and specificity = 0.76) and the best cut-off value for intensity to predict high density sites was 403 (sensitivity = 0.93 and specificity = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: CBCT intensity values are considered useful for predicting bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5594958/ /pubmed/28932139 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_14_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Alkhader, Mustafa
Hudieb, Malik
Khader, Yousef
Predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography intensity values
title Predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography intensity values
title_full Predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography intensity values
title_fullStr Predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography intensity values
title_full_unstemmed Predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography intensity values
title_short Predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography intensity values
title_sort predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography intensity values
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932139
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_14_17
work_keys_str_mv AT alkhadermustafa predictabilityofbonedensityatposteriormandibularimplantsitesusingconebeamcomputedtomographyintensityvalues
AT hudiebmalik predictabilityofbonedensityatposteriormandibularimplantsitesusingconebeamcomputedtomographyintensityvalues
AT khaderyousef predictabilityofbonedensityatposteriormandibularimplantsitesusingconebeamcomputedtomographyintensityvalues