Cargando…
Evaluation of crestal bone resorption around cylindrical and conical implants following 6 months of loading: A randomized clinical trial
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the effect of implant body form (cylindrical and conical implants) on crestal bone levels during 6 months’ follow-up after loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 32 SPI implants (19 conical implants/13 cylindrical implants) were rando...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932140 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_38_17 |
_version_ | 1783263296571310080 |
---|---|
author | Sargolzaie, Naser Arab, Hamid Reza Moghaddam, Marzieh Mohammadi |
author_facet | Sargolzaie, Naser Arab, Hamid Reza Moghaddam, Marzieh Mohammadi |
author_sort | Sargolzaie, Naser |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the effect of implant body form (cylindrical and conical implants) on crestal bone levels during 6 months’ follow-up after loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 32 SPI implants (19 conical implants/13 cylindrical implants) were randomly placed in 12 male patients using a submerged approach. None of the patients had compromising medical conditions or parafunctional habits. Periapical radiographs using the parallel technique were taken after clinical loading and 6 months later. Clinical indices including pocket depth and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded on 6-month follow-up. Data were analyzed by independent samples t-test and Chi-square test with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: Six months after loading, crestal bone loss was 0.84 (±0.29) mm around the cylindrical implants and 0.73 (±0.62) mm around the conical types, which was not significantly different (P = 0.54). Pocket depth around the cylindrical and conical implants was 2.61 (±0.45) mm and 2.36 (±0.44) mm, respectively (P = 0.13). BOP was observed among 53.8% and 47.4% of the cylindrical implants and conical (P = 0.13). Bone loss and pocket depth in the maxilla and mandible had no significant difference (P = 0.46 and P = 0.09, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this study, although bone loss and clinical parameters were slightly higher in the cylindrical implants, there was no significant difference between the conical- and cylindrical-shaped implants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5594959 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55949592017-09-20 Evaluation of crestal bone resorption around cylindrical and conical implants following 6 months of loading: A randomized clinical trial Sargolzaie, Naser Arab, Hamid Reza Moghaddam, Marzieh Mohammadi Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the effect of implant body form (cylindrical and conical implants) on crestal bone levels during 6 months’ follow-up after loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 32 SPI implants (19 conical implants/13 cylindrical implants) were randomly placed in 12 male patients using a submerged approach. None of the patients had compromising medical conditions or parafunctional habits. Periapical radiographs using the parallel technique were taken after clinical loading and 6 months later. Clinical indices including pocket depth and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded on 6-month follow-up. Data were analyzed by independent samples t-test and Chi-square test with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: Six months after loading, crestal bone loss was 0.84 (±0.29) mm around the cylindrical implants and 0.73 (±0.62) mm around the conical types, which was not significantly different (P = 0.54). Pocket depth around the cylindrical and conical implants was 2.61 (±0.45) mm and 2.36 (±0.44) mm, respectively (P = 0.13). BOP was observed among 53.8% and 47.4% of the cylindrical implants and conical (P = 0.13). Bone loss and pocket depth in the maxilla and mandible had no significant difference (P = 0.46 and P = 0.09, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this study, although bone loss and clinical parameters were slightly higher in the cylindrical implants, there was no significant difference between the conical- and cylindrical-shaped implants. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5594959/ /pubmed/28932140 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_38_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sargolzaie, Naser Arab, Hamid Reza Moghaddam, Marzieh Mohammadi Evaluation of crestal bone resorption around cylindrical and conical implants following 6 months of loading: A randomized clinical trial |
title | Evaluation of crestal bone resorption around cylindrical and conical implants following 6 months of loading: A randomized clinical trial |
title_full | Evaluation of crestal bone resorption around cylindrical and conical implants following 6 months of loading: A randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of crestal bone resorption around cylindrical and conical implants following 6 months of loading: A randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of crestal bone resorption around cylindrical and conical implants following 6 months of loading: A randomized clinical trial |
title_short | Evaluation of crestal bone resorption around cylindrical and conical implants following 6 months of loading: A randomized clinical trial |
title_sort | evaluation of crestal bone resorption around cylindrical and conical implants following 6 months of loading: a randomized clinical trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932140 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_38_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sargolzaienaser evaluationofcrestalboneresorptionaroundcylindricalandconicalimplantsfollowing6monthsofloadingarandomizedclinicaltrial AT arabhamidreza evaluationofcrestalboneresorptionaroundcylindricalandconicalimplantsfollowing6monthsofloadingarandomizedclinicaltrial AT moghaddammarziehmohammadi evaluationofcrestalboneresorptionaroundcylindricalandconicalimplantsfollowing6monthsofloadingarandomizedclinicaltrial |