Cargando…

Peri-implantitis and extracellular matrix antibodies: A case–control study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this case–control study was to compare patients with a healthy peri-implant environment and patients affected by peri-implantitis, evaluating the occurrence of antibodies to extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules. The authors hypothesized the presence of ECM autoantibodies in ser...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papi, Piero, Di Carlo, Stefano, Rosella, Daniele, De Angelis, Francesca, Capogreco, Mario, Pompa, Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932144
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_28_17
_version_ 1783263297500348416
author Papi, Piero
Di Carlo, Stefano
Rosella, Daniele
De Angelis, Francesca
Capogreco, Mario
Pompa, Giorgio
author_facet Papi, Piero
Di Carlo, Stefano
Rosella, Daniele
De Angelis, Francesca
Capogreco, Mario
Pompa, Giorgio
author_sort Papi, Piero
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this case–control study was to compare patients with a healthy peri-implant environment and patients affected by peri-implantitis, evaluating the occurrence of antibodies to extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules. The authors hypothesized the presence of ECM autoantibodies in serum of peri-implantitis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups: one with dental implants with a diagnosis of peri-implantitis and one control group with implants classified as being “healthy.” Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed on patients’ sera to detect human antibodies to type I, III, IV, and V collagens, laminin, and fibronectin. Fisher exact test was performed to evaluate statistical association, with a significant P < 0.05. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were enrolled in this study, 27 females (64.28%) and 15 males (35.72%) with a mean age of 53 ± 29.69 years (age range 32–74). The presence of antibodies to CIII was recorded in 6/21 (28.57%) patients of test group, compared to just 2/21 (9.52%) for the control group, showing a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Other antibodies tested were found to be not statistically significant or absent. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that further studies, with larger sample and different design, are necessary to address the research purpose, evaluating possible associations between anti-ECM antibodies and peri-implantitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5594963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55949632017-09-20 Peri-implantitis and extracellular matrix antibodies: A case–control study Papi, Piero Di Carlo, Stefano Rosella, Daniele De Angelis, Francesca Capogreco, Mario Pompa, Giorgio Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this case–control study was to compare patients with a healthy peri-implant environment and patients affected by peri-implantitis, evaluating the occurrence of antibodies to extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules. The authors hypothesized the presence of ECM autoantibodies in serum of peri-implantitis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups: one with dental implants with a diagnosis of peri-implantitis and one control group with implants classified as being “healthy.” Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed on patients’ sera to detect human antibodies to type I, III, IV, and V collagens, laminin, and fibronectin. Fisher exact test was performed to evaluate statistical association, with a significant P < 0.05. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were enrolled in this study, 27 females (64.28%) and 15 males (35.72%) with a mean age of 53 ± 29.69 years (age range 32–74). The presence of antibodies to CIII was recorded in 6/21 (28.57%) patients of test group, compared to just 2/21 (9.52%) for the control group, showing a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Other antibodies tested were found to be not statistically significant or absent. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that further studies, with larger sample and different design, are necessary to address the research purpose, evaluating possible associations between anti-ECM antibodies and peri-implantitis. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5594963/ /pubmed/28932144 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_28_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Papi, Piero
Di Carlo, Stefano
Rosella, Daniele
De Angelis, Francesca
Capogreco, Mario
Pompa, Giorgio
Peri-implantitis and extracellular matrix antibodies: A case–control study
title Peri-implantitis and extracellular matrix antibodies: A case–control study
title_full Peri-implantitis and extracellular matrix antibodies: A case–control study
title_fullStr Peri-implantitis and extracellular matrix antibodies: A case–control study
title_full_unstemmed Peri-implantitis and extracellular matrix antibodies: A case–control study
title_short Peri-implantitis and extracellular matrix antibodies: A case–control study
title_sort peri-implantitis and extracellular matrix antibodies: a case–control study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932144
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_28_17
work_keys_str_mv AT papipiero periimplantitisandextracellularmatrixantibodiesacasecontrolstudy
AT dicarlostefano periimplantitisandextracellularmatrixantibodiesacasecontrolstudy
AT roselladaniele periimplantitisandextracellularmatrixantibodiesacasecontrolstudy
AT deangelisfrancesca periimplantitisandextracellularmatrixantibodiesacasecontrolstudy
AT capogrecomario periimplantitisandextracellularmatrixantibodiesacasecontrolstudy
AT pompagiorgio periimplantitisandextracellularmatrixantibodiesacasecontrolstudy