Cargando…
Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial
OBJECTIVE: In permanent dentition, different rotary systems are used for canal cleaning and shaping. Rotary instrumentation in pediatric dentistry is an emerging concept. A very few studies have compared the efficiency of rotary instrumentation for canal preparation in primary teeth. Hence, this stu...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932150 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_345_16 |
_version_ | 1783263298914877440 |
---|---|
author | Govindaraju, Lavanya Jeevanandan, Ganesh Subramanian, E. M. G. |
author_facet | Govindaraju, Lavanya Jeevanandan, Ganesh Subramanian, E. M. G. |
author_sort | Govindaraju, Lavanya |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: In permanent dentition, different rotary systems are used for canal cleaning and shaping. Rotary instrumentation in pediatric dentistry is an emerging concept. A very few studies have compared the efficiency of rotary instrumentation for canal preparation in primary teeth. Hence, this study was performed to compare the obturation quality and instrumentation time of two rotary files systems – Protaper, Mtwo with hand files in primary molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five primary mandibular molars were randomly allotted to one of the three groups. Instrumentation was done using K-files in Group 1; Protaper in Group 2; and Mtwo in Group 3. Instrumentation time was recorded. The canal filling quality was assessed as underfill, optimal fill, and overfill. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square, ANOVA, and post hoc Tukey test. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in the quality of obturation among three groups. Intergroup comparison of the instrumentation time showed a statistically significant difference between the three groups. CONCLUSION: The use of rotary instrumentation in primary teeth results in marked reduction in the instrumentation time and improves the quality of obturation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5594969 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55949692017-09-20 Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial Govindaraju, Lavanya Jeevanandan, Ganesh Subramanian, E. M. G. Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: In permanent dentition, different rotary systems are used for canal cleaning and shaping. Rotary instrumentation in pediatric dentistry is an emerging concept. A very few studies have compared the efficiency of rotary instrumentation for canal preparation in primary teeth. Hence, this study was performed to compare the obturation quality and instrumentation time of two rotary files systems – Protaper, Mtwo with hand files in primary molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five primary mandibular molars were randomly allotted to one of the three groups. Instrumentation was done using K-files in Group 1; Protaper in Group 2; and Mtwo in Group 3. Instrumentation time was recorded. The canal filling quality was assessed as underfill, optimal fill, and overfill. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square, ANOVA, and post hoc Tukey test. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in the quality of obturation among three groups. Intergroup comparison of the instrumentation time showed a statistically significant difference between the three groups. CONCLUSION: The use of rotary instrumentation in primary teeth results in marked reduction in the instrumentation time and improves the quality of obturation. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5594969/ /pubmed/28932150 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_345_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Govindaraju, Lavanya Jeevanandan, Ganesh Subramanian, E. M. G. Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932150 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_345_16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT govindarajulavanya comparisonofqualityofobturationandinstrumentationtimeusinghandfilesandtworotaryfilesystemsinprimarymolarsasingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jeevanandanganesh comparisonofqualityofobturationandinstrumentationtimeusinghandfilesandtworotaryfilesystemsinprimarymolarsasingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT subramanianemg comparisonofqualityofobturationandinstrumentationtimeusinghandfilesandtworotaryfilesystemsinprimarymolarsasingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial |