Cargando…

Analysis of cataract surgery induced astigmatism: Two polar methods comparison

PURPOSE: Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) caused by the incision after cataract surgery may be calculated to improve IOL toric power calculation and achieve better visual outcome. SIA could be determined as the difference between preoperative and postoperative keratometry expressed in polar valu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: García-López, Veronica, García-López, Claudia, de Juan, Victoria, Martin, Raul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5595260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28040496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2016.11.001
_version_ 1783263337411248128
author García-López, Veronica
García-López, Claudia
de Juan, Victoria
Martin, Raul
author_facet García-López, Veronica
García-López, Claudia
de Juan, Victoria
Martin, Raul
author_sort García-López, Veronica
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) caused by the incision after cataract surgery may be calculated to improve IOL toric power calculation and achieve better visual outcome. SIA could be determined as the difference between preoperative and postoperative keratometry expressed in polar values using different equations. The objective of this study is to compare the SIA calculated with two different polar value analysis methods [Method #1: KP (90)/KP (135) developed to be used with incisions placed at 90° and Method #2: AKP/AKP (+45) developed to be used independently of the incision location]. METHODS: Preoperative and one month postoperative data of 210 cataractous eyes (131 patients) undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery were assessed. All incisions were performed at 11 o’clock (120°). No sutures were used in any patient. IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, Ireland) keratometry was used to polar calculation. RESULTS: The average age was 66.25 ± 12.33 years (range 22–89). SIA polar value data calculated with Method #1 were KP (90) −0.06 ± 0.52D and KP (135) +0.05 ± 0.91D and calculated with Method #2 were AKP −0.10 ± 0.87D and AKP (+45) +0.02 ± 0.02D. However, SIA value represented in traditional notation (diopters@axis in degrees) was the same value independently of the method used to calculate; +0.65@110.70°. CONCLUSION: SIA value is independent of the polar method used to its calculation and slight variations in the incision position could be accepted without clinical relevant impact in SIA magnitude. Both methods [Method #1: KP (90)/KP (135) and Method #2: AKP/AKP (+45)] are useful to calculate SIA with superior incisions at 120°.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5595260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55952602017-09-20 Analysis of cataract surgery induced astigmatism: Two polar methods comparison García-López, Veronica García-López, Claudia de Juan, Victoria Martin, Raul J Optom Original Article PURPOSE: Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) caused by the incision after cataract surgery may be calculated to improve IOL toric power calculation and achieve better visual outcome. SIA could be determined as the difference between preoperative and postoperative keratometry expressed in polar values using different equations. The objective of this study is to compare the SIA calculated with two different polar value analysis methods [Method #1: KP (90)/KP (135) developed to be used with incisions placed at 90° and Method #2: AKP/AKP (+45) developed to be used independently of the incision location]. METHODS: Preoperative and one month postoperative data of 210 cataractous eyes (131 patients) undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery were assessed. All incisions were performed at 11 o’clock (120°). No sutures were used in any patient. IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, Ireland) keratometry was used to polar calculation. RESULTS: The average age was 66.25 ± 12.33 years (range 22–89). SIA polar value data calculated with Method #1 were KP (90) −0.06 ± 0.52D and KP (135) +0.05 ± 0.91D and calculated with Method #2 were AKP −0.10 ± 0.87D and AKP (+45) +0.02 ± 0.02D. However, SIA value represented in traditional notation (diopters@axis in degrees) was the same value independently of the method used to calculate; +0.65@110.70°. CONCLUSION: SIA value is independent of the polar method used to its calculation and slight variations in the incision position could be accepted without clinical relevant impact in SIA magnitude. Both methods [Method #1: KP (90)/KP (135) and Method #2: AKP/AKP (+45)] are useful to calculate SIA with superior incisions at 120°. Elsevier 2017 2016-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5595260/ /pubmed/28040496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2016.11.001 Text en © 2016 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier Espa˜na, S.L.U. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
García-López, Veronica
García-López, Claudia
de Juan, Victoria
Martin, Raul
Analysis of cataract surgery induced astigmatism: Two polar methods comparison
title Analysis of cataract surgery induced astigmatism: Two polar methods comparison
title_full Analysis of cataract surgery induced astigmatism: Two polar methods comparison
title_fullStr Analysis of cataract surgery induced astigmatism: Two polar methods comparison
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of cataract surgery induced astigmatism: Two polar methods comparison
title_short Analysis of cataract surgery induced astigmatism: Two polar methods comparison
title_sort analysis of cataract surgery induced astigmatism: two polar methods comparison
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5595260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28040496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2016.11.001
work_keys_str_mv AT garcialopezveronica analysisofcataractsurgeryinducedastigmatismtwopolarmethodscomparison
AT garcialopezclaudia analysisofcataractsurgeryinducedastigmatismtwopolarmethodscomparison
AT dejuanvictoria analysisofcataractsurgeryinducedastigmatismtwopolarmethodscomparison
AT martinraul analysisofcataractsurgeryinducedastigmatismtwopolarmethodscomparison