Cargando…
Analysis of cataract surgery induced astigmatism: Two polar methods comparison
PURPOSE: Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) caused by the incision after cataract surgery may be calculated to improve IOL toric power calculation and achieve better visual outcome. SIA could be determined as the difference between preoperative and postoperative keratometry expressed in polar valu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5595260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28040496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2016.11.001 |
_version_ | 1783263337411248128 |
---|---|
author | García-López, Veronica García-López, Claudia de Juan, Victoria Martin, Raul |
author_facet | García-López, Veronica García-López, Claudia de Juan, Victoria Martin, Raul |
author_sort | García-López, Veronica |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) caused by the incision after cataract surgery may be calculated to improve IOL toric power calculation and achieve better visual outcome. SIA could be determined as the difference between preoperative and postoperative keratometry expressed in polar values using different equations. The objective of this study is to compare the SIA calculated with two different polar value analysis methods [Method #1: KP (90)/KP (135) developed to be used with incisions placed at 90° and Method #2: AKP/AKP (+45) developed to be used independently of the incision location]. METHODS: Preoperative and one month postoperative data of 210 cataractous eyes (131 patients) undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery were assessed. All incisions were performed at 11 o’clock (120°). No sutures were used in any patient. IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, Ireland) keratometry was used to polar calculation. RESULTS: The average age was 66.25 ± 12.33 years (range 22–89). SIA polar value data calculated with Method #1 were KP (90) −0.06 ± 0.52D and KP (135) +0.05 ± 0.91D and calculated with Method #2 were AKP −0.10 ± 0.87D and AKP (+45) +0.02 ± 0.02D. However, SIA value represented in traditional notation (diopters@axis in degrees) was the same value independently of the method used to calculate; +0.65@110.70°. CONCLUSION: SIA value is independent of the polar method used to its calculation and slight variations in the incision position could be accepted without clinical relevant impact in SIA magnitude. Both methods [Method #1: KP (90)/KP (135) and Method #2: AKP/AKP (+45)] are useful to calculate SIA with superior incisions at 120°. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5595260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55952602017-09-20 Analysis of cataract surgery induced astigmatism: Two polar methods comparison García-López, Veronica García-López, Claudia de Juan, Victoria Martin, Raul J Optom Original Article PURPOSE: Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) caused by the incision after cataract surgery may be calculated to improve IOL toric power calculation and achieve better visual outcome. SIA could be determined as the difference between preoperative and postoperative keratometry expressed in polar values using different equations. The objective of this study is to compare the SIA calculated with two different polar value analysis methods [Method #1: KP (90)/KP (135) developed to be used with incisions placed at 90° and Method #2: AKP/AKP (+45) developed to be used independently of the incision location]. METHODS: Preoperative and one month postoperative data of 210 cataractous eyes (131 patients) undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery were assessed. All incisions were performed at 11 o’clock (120°). No sutures were used in any patient. IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, Ireland) keratometry was used to polar calculation. RESULTS: The average age was 66.25 ± 12.33 years (range 22–89). SIA polar value data calculated with Method #1 were KP (90) −0.06 ± 0.52D and KP (135) +0.05 ± 0.91D and calculated with Method #2 were AKP −0.10 ± 0.87D and AKP (+45) +0.02 ± 0.02D. However, SIA value represented in traditional notation (diopters@axis in degrees) was the same value independently of the method used to calculate; +0.65@110.70°. CONCLUSION: SIA value is independent of the polar method used to its calculation and slight variations in the incision position could be accepted without clinical relevant impact in SIA magnitude. Both methods [Method #1: KP (90)/KP (135) and Method #2: AKP/AKP (+45)] are useful to calculate SIA with superior incisions at 120°. Elsevier 2017 2016-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5595260/ /pubmed/28040496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2016.11.001 Text en © 2016 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier Espa˜na, S.L.U. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article García-López, Veronica García-López, Claudia de Juan, Victoria Martin, Raul Analysis of cataract surgery induced astigmatism: Two polar methods comparison |
title | Analysis of cataract surgery induced astigmatism: Two polar methods comparison |
title_full | Analysis of cataract surgery induced astigmatism: Two polar methods comparison |
title_fullStr | Analysis of cataract surgery induced astigmatism: Two polar methods comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of cataract surgery induced astigmatism: Two polar methods comparison |
title_short | Analysis of cataract surgery induced astigmatism: Two polar methods comparison |
title_sort | analysis of cataract surgery induced astigmatism: two polar methods comparison |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5595260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28040496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2016.11.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garcialopezveronica analysisofcataractsurgeryinducedastigmatismtwopolarmethodscomparison AT garcialopezclaudia analysisofcataractsurgeryinducedastigmatismtwopolarmethodscomparison AT dejuanvictoria analysisofcataractsurgeryinducedastigmatismtwopolarmethodscomparison AT martinraul analysisofcataractsurgeryinducedastigmatismtwopolarmethodscomparison |