Cargando…
Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine
BACKGROUND: DM remains a risk factor for poor outcome after stent-implantation, but little is known if and how DM affects the vascular response to BVS. AIM: The aim of our study was to examine coronary responses to bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) in swine with and without diabetes mellitus fe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5595285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28898243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183419 |
_version_ | 1783263342857551872 |
---|---|
author | van Ditzhuijzen, Nienke S. Kurata, Mie van den Heuvel, Mieke Sorop, Oana van Duin, Richard W. B. Krabbendam-Peters, Ilona Ligthart, Jurgen Witberg, Karen Murawska, Magdalena Bouma, Brett Villiger, Martin Garcia-Garcia, Hector M. Serruys, Patrick W. Zijlstra, Felix van Soest, Gijs Duncker, Dirk-Jan Regar, Evelyn van Beusekom, Heleen M. M. |
author_facet | van Ditzhuijzen, Nienke S. Kurata, Mie van den Heuvel, Mieke Sorop, Oana van Duin, Richard W. B. Krabbendam-Peters, Ilona Ligthart, Jurgen Witberg, Karen Murawska, Magdalena Bouma, Brett Villiger, Martin Garcia-Garcia, Hector M. Serruys, Patrick W. Zijlstra, Felix van Soest, Gijs Duncker, Dirk-Jan Regar, Evelyn van Beusekom, Heleen M. M. |
author_sort | van Ditzhuijzen, Nienke S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: DM remains a risk factor for poor outcome after stent-implantation, but little is known if and how DM affects the vascular response to BVS. AIM: The aim of our study was to examine coronary responses to bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) in swine with and without diabetes mellitus fed a ‘fast-food’ diet (FF-DM and FF-NDM, respectively) by sequential optical coherence tomography (OCT)-imaging and histology. METHODS: Fifteen male swine were evaluated. Eight received streptozotocin-injection to induce DM. After 9 months (M), 32 single BVS were implanted in epicardial arteries with a stent to artery (S/A)-ratio of 1.1:1 under quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and OCT guidance. Lumen, scaffold, neointimal coverage and composition were assessed by QCA, OCT and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) pre- and/or post-procedure, at 3M and 6M. Additionally, polarization-sensitive (PS)-OCT was performed in 7 swine at 6M. After sacrifice at 3M and 6M, histology and polymer degradation analysis were performed. RESULTS: Late lumen loss was high (~60%) within the first 3M after BVS-implantation (P<0.01 FF-DM vs. FF-NDM) and stabilized between 3M and 6M (<5% change in FF-DM, ~10% in FF-NDM; P>0.20). Neointimal coverage was highly heterogeneous in all swine (DM vs. NDM P>0.05), with focal lipid accumulation, irregular collagen distribution and neointimal calcification. Likewise, polymer mass loss was low (~2% at 3M, ~5% at 6M;P>0.20) and not associated with DM or inflammation. CONCLUSION: Scaffold coverage showed signs of neo-atherosclerosis in all FF-DM and FF-NDM swine, scaffold polymer was preserved and the vascular response to BVS was not influenced by diabetes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5595285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55952852017-09-15 Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine van Ditzhuijzen, Nienke S. Kurata, Mie van den Heuvel, Mieke Sorop, Oana van Duin, Richard W. B. Krabbendam-Peters, Ilona Ligthart, Jurgen Witberg, Karen Murawska, Magdalena Bouma, Brett Villiger, Martin Garcia-Garcia, Hector M. Serruys, Patrick W. Zijlstra, Felix van Soest, Gijs Duncker, Dirk-Jan Regar, Evelyn van Beusekom, Heleen M. M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: DM remains a risk factor for poor outcome after stent-implantation, but little is known if and how DM affects the vascular response to BVS. AIM: The aim of our study was to examine coronary responses to bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) in swine with and without diabetes mellitus fed a ‘fast-food’ diet (FF-DM and FF-NDM, respectively) by sequential optical coherence tomography (OCT)-imaging and histology. METHODS: Fifteen male swine were evaluated. Eight received streptozotocin-injection to induce DM. After 9 months (M), 32 single BVS were implanted in epicardial arteries with a stent to artery (S/A)-ratio of 1.1:1 under quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and OCT guidance. Lumen, scaffold, neointimal coverage and composition were assessed by QCA, OCT and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) pre- and/or post-procedure, at 3M and 6M. Additionally, polarization-sensitive (PS)-OCT was performed in 7 swine at 6M. After sacrifice at 3M and 6M, histology and polymer degradation analysis were performed. RESULTS: Late lumen loss was high (~60%) within the first 3M after BVS-implantation (P<0.01 FF-DM vs. FF-NDM) and stabilized between 3M and 6M (<5% change in FF-DM, ~10% in FF-NDM; P>0.20). Neointimal coverage was highly heterogeneous in all swine (DM vs. NDM P>0.05), with focal lipid accumulation, irregular collagen distribution and neointimal calcification. Likewise, polymer mass loss was low (~2% at 3M, ~5% at 6M;P>0.20) and not associated with DM or inflammation. CONCLUSION: Scaffold coverage showed signs of neo-atherosclerosis in all FF-DM and FF-NDM swine, scaffold polymer was preserved and the vascular response to BVS was not influenced by diabetes. Public Library of Science 2017-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5595285/ /pubmed/28898243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183419 Text en © 2017 van Ditzhuijzen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van Ditzhuijzen, Nienke S. Kurata, Mie van den Heuvel, Mieke Sorop, Oana van Duin, Richard W. B. Krabbendam-Peters, Ilona Ligthart, Jurgen Witberg, Karen Murawska, Magdalena Bouma, Brett Villiger, Martin Garcia-Garcia, Hector M. Serruys, Patrick W. Zijlstra, Felix van Soest, Gijs Duncker, Dirk-Jan Regar, Evelyn van Beusekom, Heleen M. M. Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine |
title | Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine |
title_full | Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine |
title_fullStr | Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine |
title_full_unstemmed | Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine |
title_short | Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine |
title_sort | neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5595285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28898243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183419 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanditzhuijzennienkes neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT kuratamie neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT vandenheuvelmieke neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT soropoana neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT vanduinrichardwb neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT krabbendampetersilona neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT ligthartjurgen neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT witbergkaren neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT murawskamagdalena neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT boumabrett neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT villigermartin neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT garciagarciahectorm neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT serruyspatrickw neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT zijlstrafelix neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT vansoestgijs neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT dunckerdirkjan neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT regarevelyn neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT vanbeusekomheleenmm neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine |