Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness and tolerance of immunosuppressive treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive agents in general are shown to prevent renal progression and all-cause mortality in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) patients with nephrotic syndrome. However, the efficacy and safety of different immunosuppressive treatments have not been systematic assessed and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ren, Song, Wang, Ying, Xian, Li, Toyama, Tadashi, Jardine, Meg, Li, Guisen, Perkovic, Vlado, Hong, Daqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5595305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28898290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184398
_version_ 1783263347582435328
author Ren, Song
Wang, Ying
Xian, Li
Toyama, Tadashi
Jardine, Meg
Li, Guisen
Perkovic, Vlado
Hong, Daqing
author_facet Ren, Song
Wang, Ying
Xian, Li
Toyama, Tadashi
Jardine, Meg
Li, Guisen
Perkovic, Vlado
Hong, Daqing
author_sort Ren, Song
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive agents in general are shown to prevent renal progression and all-cause mortality in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) patients with nephrotic syndrome. However, the efficacy and safety of different immunosuppressive treatments have not been systematic assessed and compared. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare different immunosuppressive treatment in IMN. METHODS: Cochrane library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and trial register system were searched for randomized controlled trials reporting the treatments for IMN to May 3, 2016. Composite endpoint of mortality or end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), complete or partial proteinuria remission and withdrawal because of treatment adverse events were compared combing direct and indirect comparison using network meta-analysis. Ranking different immunosuppressive treatments in the outcomes were analyzed by using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). RESULTS: Total 36 randomized controlled trials (n = 2018) covering 11 kinds of treatments were included. Compared with non-immunosuppressive treatment, only cyclophosphamide (CTX) and chlorambucil significantly reduced the risk of composite outcome of mortality or ESKD while combining the direct and indirect comparison (OR = 0.31, 95%CI: 0.12–0.81 and OR = 0.33, 95%CI: 0.12–0.92). CTX increased the composite outcome of complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) (OR = 4.29, 95%CI: 2.30–8.00) but chlorambucil did not (OR = 1.58, 95%CI: 0.80–3.12) as compared with non-immunosuppressive treatment. Chlorambucil also significantly increased the withdrawal risk (OR = 3.34, 95%CI: 1.37–8.17) as compared to CTX. Both tacrolimus (OR = 3.10, 95%CI: 1.36–7.09) and cyclosporine (CsA) (OR = 2.81, 95%CI: 1.08–7.32) also significantly increased the rate of CR or PR as compared with non-immunosuppressive treatment (without significant difference as compared with CTX), while ranking results showed that cyclosporine or tacrolimus was with less possibility of drug withdrawal as compared to CTX. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclophosphamide and chlorambucil reduce risk of ESKD or death in IMN with nephrotic range proteinuria, but carry substantial toxicity that may be lower for cyclophosphamide. Tacrolimus and cyclosporine increase the possibility of proteinuria remission with less drug withdrawal, but the effects on kidney failure remain uncertain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5595305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55953052017-09-15 Comparative effectiveness and tolerance of immunosuppressive treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A network meta-analysis Ren, Song Wang, Ying Xian, Li Toyama, Tadashi Jardine, Meg Li, Guisen Perkovic, Vlado Hong, Daqing PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive agents in general are shown to prevent renal progression and all-cause mortality in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) patients with nephrotic syndrome. However, the efficacy and safety of different immunosuppressive treatments have not been systematic assessed and compared. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare different immunosuppressive treatment in IMN. METHODS: Cochrane library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and trial register system were searched for randomized controlled trials reporting the treatments for IMN to May 3, 2016. Composite endpoint of mortality or end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), complete or partial proteinuria remission and withdrawal because of treatment adverse events were compared combing direct and indirect comparison using network meta-analysis. Ranking different immunosuppressive treatments in the outcomes were analyzed by using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). RESULTS: Total 36 randomized controlled trials (n = 2018) covering 11 kinds of treatments were included. Compared with non-immunosuppressive treatment, only cyclophosphamide (CTX) and chlorambucil significantly reduced the risk of composite outcome of mortality or ESKD while combining the direct and indirect comparison (OR = 0.31, 95%CI: 0.12–0.81 and OR = 0.33, 95%CI: 0.12–0.92). CTX increased the composite outcome of complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) (OR = 4.29, 95%CI: 2.30–8.00) but chlorambucil did not (OR = 1.58, 95%CI: 0.80–3.12) as compared with non-immunosuppressive treatment. Chlorambucil also significantly increased the withdrawal risk (OR = 3.34, 95%CI: 1.37–8.17) as compared to CTX. Both tacrolimus (OR = 3.10, 95%CI: 1.36–7.09) and cyclosporine (CsA) (OR = 2.81, 95%CI: 1.08–7.32) also significantly increased the rate of CR or PR as compared with non-immunosuppressive treatment (without significant difference as compared with CTX), while ranking results showed that cyclosporine or tacrolimus was with less possibility of drug withdrawal as compared to CTX. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclophosphamide and chlorambucil reduce risk of ESKD or death in IMN with nephrotic range proteinuria, but carry substantial toxicity that may be lower for cyclophosphamide. Tacrolimus and cyclosporine increase the possibility of proteinuria remission with less drug withdrawal, but the effects on kidney failure remain uncertain. Public Library of Science 2017-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5595305/ /pubmed/28898290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184398 Text en © 2017 Ren et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ren, Song
Wang, Ying
Xian, Li
Toyama, Tadashi
Jardine, Meg
Li, Guisen
Perkovic, Vlado
Hong, Daqing
Comparative effectiveness and tolerance of immunosuppressive treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A network meta-analysis
title Comparative effectiveness and tolerance of immunosuppressive treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A network meta-analysis
title_full Comparative effectiveness and tolerance of immunosuppressive treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness and tolerance of immunosuppressive treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness and tolerance of immunosuppressive treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A network meta-analysis
title_short Comparative effectiveness and tolerance of immunosuppressive treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A network meta-analysis
title_sort comparative effectiveness and tolerance of immunosuppressive treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a network meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5595305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28898290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184398
work_keys_str_mv AT rensong comparativeeffectivenessandtoleranceofimmunosuppressivetreatmentsforidiopathicmembranousnephropathyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangying comparativeeffectivenessandtoleranceofimmunosuppressivetreatmentsforidiopathicmembranousnephropathyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT xianli comparativeeffectivenessandtoleranceofimmunosuppressivetreatmentsforidiopathicmembranousnephropathyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT toyamatadashi comparativeeffectivenessandtoleranceofimmunosuppressivetreatmentsforidiopathicmembranousnephropathyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT jardinemeg comparativeeffectivenessandtoleranceofimmunosuppressivetreatmentsforidiopathicmembranousnephropathyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT liguisen comparativeeffectivenessandtoleranceofimmunosuppressivetreatmentsforidiopathicmembranousnephropathyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT perkovicvlado comparativeeffectivenessandtoleranceofimmunosuppressivetreatmentsforidiopathicmembranousnephropathyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT hongdaqing comparativeeffectivenessandtoleranceofimmunosuppressivetreatmentsforidiopathicmembranousnephropathyanetworkmetaanalysis