Cargando…

Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: why scuff when you can flush the muck – make it an easy row to hoe

BACKGROUND AND AIMS:  Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided drainage of symptomatic pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON) followed by fully covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS) placement offers several advantages such as higher technical success rate and the option of necrosectomy. The aim of thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bansal, Rinkesh Kumar, Puri, Rajesh, Choudhary, Narendra S., Bhatia, Sumit, Patel, Nisharg, Patle, Saurabh K., Patil, Gaurav K., Agarwal, Amit, Prabha, Chandra, Sud, Randhir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5595574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28924588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-112854
_version_ 1783263387710390272
author Bansal, Rinkesh Kumar
Puri, Rajesh
Choudhary, Narendra S.
Bhatia, Sumit
Patel, Nisharg
Patle, Saurabh K.
Patil, Gaurav K.
Agarwal, Amit
Prabha, Chandra
Sud, Randhir
author_facet Bansal, Rinkesh Kumar
Puri, Rajesh
Choudhary, Narendra S.
Bhatia, Sumit
Patel, Nisharg
Patle, Saurabh K.
Patil, Gaurav K.
Agarwal, Amit
Prabha, Chandra
Sud, Randhir
author_sort Bansal, Rinkesh Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS:  Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided drainage of symptomatic pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON) followed by fully covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS) placement offers several advantages such as higher technical success rate and the option of necrosectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EUS guided drainage of patients with WON by using FCSEMS and intracavitary lavage with a solution containing hydrogen peroxide and adopting a step-up approach. METHODS:  A prospective open label study was carried out at a single tertiary care center between January 2014 and January 2016. Patients with symptomatic WON who underwent EUS guided drainage followed by FCSEMS placement were included. Primary end points were complete drainage with improvement in symptoms or major adverse events. Secondary end points were minor adverse events related to the procedures. RESULTS:  A total of 64 patients (mean age 36 years; 52 males) were included. Technical success was achieved in 100 % of patients and clinical success was achieved in 90.6 %. Complete drainage was achieved with FCSEMS alone in 18 (28.1 %), FCSEMS with necrosectomy using lavage in 40 (62.5 %), FCSEMS with percutaneous drainage (PCD) in 5 (7.8 %), and 1 (1.6 %) patient required salvage surgery. The major adverse event was life threatening bleeding in 3 (4.7 %) patients. Minor adverse events were non-life threatening bleeding in 2 (3.1 %) patients and stent migration in 3 (4.7 %) patients. CONCLUSION:  EUS guided WON drainage with FCSEMS followed by necrosectomy with lavage using a solution containing hydrogen peroxide as a step-up approach is a minimally invasive and effective method with a high technical and clinical success rate. Patients with solid debris > 40 % need aggressive management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5595574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55955742017-09-18 Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: why scuff when you can flush the muck – make it an easy row to hoe Bansal, Rinkesh Kumar Puri, Rajesh Choudhary, Narendra S. Bhatia, Sumit Patel, Nisharg Patle, Saurabh K. Patil, Gaurav K. Agarwal, Amit Prabha, Chandra Sud, Randhir Endosc Int Open BACKGROUND AND AIMS:  Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided drainage of symptomatic pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON) followed by fully covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS) placement offers several advantages such as higher technical success rate and the option of necrosectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EUS guided drainage of patients with WON by using FCSEMS and intracavitary lavage with a solution containing hydrogen peroxide and adopting a step-up approach. METHODS:  A prospective open label study was carried out at a single tertiary care center between January 2014 and January 2016. Patients with symptomatic WON who underwent EUS guided drainage followed by FCSEMS placement were included. Primary end points were complete drainage with improvement in symptoms or major adverse events. Secondary end points were minor adverse events related to the procedures. RESULTS:  A total of 64 patients (mean age 36 years; 52 males) were included. Technical success was achieved in 100 % of patients and clinical success was achieved in 90.6 %. Complete drainage was achieved with FCSEMS alone in 18 (28.1 %), FCSEMS with necrosectomy using lavage in 40 (62.5 %), FCSEMS with percutaneous drainage (PCD) in 5 (7.8 %), and 1 (1.6 %) patient required salvage surgery. The major adverse event was life threatening bleeding in 3 (4.7 %) patients. Minor adverse events were non-life threatening bleeding in 2 (3.1 %) patients and stent migration in 3 (4.7 %) patients. CONCLUSION:  EUS guided WON drainage with FCSEMS followed by necrosectomy with lavage using a solution containing hydrogen peroxide as a step-up approach is a minimally invasive and effective method with a high technical and clinical success rate. Patients with solid debris > 40 % need aggressive management. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017-09 2017-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5595574/ /pubmed/28924588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-112854 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Bansal, Rinkesh Kumar
Puri, Rajesh
Choudhary, Narendra S.
Bhatia, Sumit
Patel, Nisharg
Patle, Saurabh K.
Patil, Gaurav K.
Agarwal, Amit
Prabha, Chandra
Sud, Randhir
Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: why scuff when you can flush the muck – make it an easy row to hoe
title Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: why scuff when you can flush the muck – make it an easy row to hoe
title_full Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: why scuff when you can flush the muck – make it an easy row to hoe
title_fullStr Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: why scuff when you can flush the muck – make it an easy row to hoe
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: why scuff when you can flush the muck – make it an easy row to hoe
title_short Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: why scuff when you can flush the muck – make it an easy row to hoe
title_sort endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: why scuff when you can flush the muck – make it an easy row to hoe
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5595574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28924588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-112854
work_keys_str_mv AT bansalrinkeshkumar endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhyscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe
AT purirajesh endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhyscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe
AT choudharynarendras endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhyscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe
AT bhatiasumit endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhyscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe
AT patelnisharg endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhyscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe
AT patlesaurabhk endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhyscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe
AT patilgauravk endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhyscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe
AT agarwalamit endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhyscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe
AT prabhachandra endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhyscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe
AT sudrandhir endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhyscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe