Cargando…

Recurrent network dynamics reconciles visual motion segmentation and integration

In sensory systems, a range of computational rules are presumed to be implemented by neuronal subpopulations with different tuning functions. For instance, in primate cortical area MT, different classes of direction-selective cells have been identified and related either to motion integration, segme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Medathati, N. V. Kartheek, Rankin, James, Meso, Andrew I., Kornprobst, Pierre, Masson, Guillaume S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5595847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28900120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11373-z
_version_ 1783263430564642816
author Medathati, N. V. Kartheek
Rankin, James
Meso, Andrew I.
Kornprobst, Pierre
Masson, Guillaume S.
author_facet Medathati, N. V. Kartheek
Rankin, James
Meso, Andrew I.
Kornprobst, Pierre
Masson, Guillaume S.
author_sort Medathati, N. V. Kartheek
collection PubMed
description In sensory systems, a range of computational rules are presumed to be implemented by neuronal subpopulations with different tuning functions. For instance, in primate cortical area MT, different classes of direction-selective cells have been identified and related either to motion integration, segmentation or transparency. Still, how such different tuning properties are constructed is unclear. The dominant theoretical viewpoint based on a linear-nonlinear feed-forward cascade does not account for their complex temporal dynamics and their versatility when facing different input statistics. Here, we demonstrate that a recurrent network model of visual motion processing can reconcile these different properties. Using a ring network, we show how excitatory and inhibitory interactions can implement different computational rules such as vector averaging, winner-take-all or superposition. The model also captures ordered temporal transitions between these behaviors. In particular, depending on the inhibition regime the network can switch from motion integration to segmentation, thus being able to compute either a single pattern motion or to superpose multiple inputs as in motion transparency. We thus demonstrate that recurrent architectures can adaptively give rise to different cortical computational regimes depending upon the input statistics, from sensory flow integration to segmentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5595847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55958472017-09-14 Recurrent network dynamics reconciles visual motion segmentation and integration Medathati, N. V. Kartheek Rankin, James Meso, Andrew I. Kornprobst, Pierre Masson, Guillaume S. Sci Rep Article In sensory systems, a range of computational rules are presumed to be implemented by neuronal subpopulations with different tuning functions. For instance, in primate cortical area MT, different classes of direction-selective cells have been identified and related either to motion integration, segmentation or transparency. Still, how such different tuning properties are constructed is unclear. The dominant theoretical viewpoint based on a linear-nonlinear feed-forward cascade does not account for their complex temporal dynamics and their versatility when facing different input statistics. Here, we demonstrate that a recurrent network model of visual motion processing can reconcile these different properties. Using a ring network, we show how excitatory and inhibitory interactions can implement different computational rules such as vector averaging, winner-take-all or superposition. The model also captures ordered temporal transitions between these behaviors. In particular, depending on the inhibition regime the network can switch from motion integration to segmentation, thus being able to compute either a single pattern motion or to superpose multiple inputs as in motion transparency. We thus demonstrate that recurrent architectures can adaptively give rise to different cortical computational regimes depending upon the input statistics, from sensory flow integration to segmentation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5595847/ /pubmed/28900120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11373-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Medathati, N. V. Kartheek
Rankin, James
Meso, Andrew I.
Kornprobst, Pierre
Masson, Guillaume S.
Recurrent network dynamics reconciles visual motion segmentation and integration
title Recurrent network dynamics reconciles visual motion segmentation and integration
title_full Recurrent network dynamics reconciles visual motion segmentation and integration
title_fullStr Recurrent network dynamics reconciles visual motion segmentation and integration
title_full_unstemmed Recurrent network dynamics reconciles visual motion segmentation and integration
title_short Recurrent network dynamics reconciles visual motion segmentation and integration
title_sort recurrent network dynamics reconciles visual motion segmentation and integration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5595847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28900120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11373-z
work_keys_str_mv AT medathatinvkartheek recurrentnetworkdynamicsreconcilesvisualmotionsegmentationandintegration
AT rankinjames recurrentnetworkdynamicsreconcilesvisualmotionsegmentationandintegration
AT mesoandrewi recurrentnetworkdynamicsreconcilesvisualmotionsegmentationandintegration
AT kornprobstpierre recurrentnetworkdynamicsreconcilesvisualmotionsegmentationandintegration
AT massonguillaumes recurrentnetworkdynamicsreconcilesvisualmotionsegmentationandintegration