Cargando…
Dogs are not better than humans at detecting coherent motion
The ability to perceive motion is one of the main properties of the visual system. Sensitivity in detecting coherent motion has been thoroughly investigated in humans, where thresholds for motion detection are well below 10% of coherence, i.e. of the proportion of dots coherently moving in the same...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5595918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28900293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11864-z |
_version_ | 1783263447268458496 |
---|---|
author | Kanizsár, Orsolya Mongillo, Paolo Battaglini, Luca Campana, Gianluca Marinelli, Lieta |
author_facet | Kanizsár, Orsolya Mongillo, Paolo Battaglini, Luca Campana, Gianluca Marinelli, Lieta |
author_sort | Kanizsár, Orsolya |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ability to perceive motion is one of the main properties of the visual system. Sensitivity in detecting coherent motion has been thoroughly investigated in humans, where thresholds for motion detection are well below 10% of coherence, i.e. of the proportion of dots coherently moving in the same direction, among a background of randomly moving dots. Equally low thresholds have been found in other species, including monkeys, cats and seals. Given the lack of data from the domestic dog, we tested 5 adult dogs on a conditioned discrimination task with random dot displays. In addition, five adult humans were tested in the same condition for comparative purposes. The mean threshold for motion detection in our dogs was 42% of coherence, while that of humans was as low as 5%. Therefore, dogs have a much higher threshold of coherent motion detection than humans, and possibly also than phylogenetically closer species that have been tested in similar experimental conditions. Various factors, including the relative role of global and local motion processing and experience with the experimental stimuli may have contributed to this result. Overall, this finding questions the general claim on dogs’ high performance in detecting motion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5595918 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55959182017-09-15 Dogs are not better than humans at detecting coherent motion Kanizsár, Orsolya Mongillo, Paolo Battaglini, Luca Campana, Gianluca Marinelli, Lieta Sci Rep Article The ability to perceive motion is one of the main properties of the visual system. Sensitivity in detecting coherent motion has been thoroughly investigated in humans, where thresholds for motion detection are well below 10% of coherence, i.e. of the proportion of dots coherently moving in the same direction, among a background of randomly moving dots. Equally low thresholds have been found in other species, including monkeys, cats and seals. Given the lack of data from the domestic dog, we tested 5 adult dogs on a conditioned discrimination task with random dot displays. In addition, five adult humans were tested in the same condition for comparative purposes. The mean threshold for motion detection in our dogs was 42% of coherence, while that of humans was as low as 5%. Therefore, dogs have a much higher threshold of coherent motion detection than humans, and possibly also than phylogenetically closer species that have been tested in similar experimental conditions. Various factors, including the relative role of global and local motion processing and experience with the experimental stimuli may have contributed to this result. Overall, this finding questions the general claim on dogs’ high performance in detecting motion. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5595918/ /pubmed/28900293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11864-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Kanizsár, Orsolya Mongillo, Paolo Battaglini, Luca Campana, Gianluca Marinelli, Lieta Dogs are not better than humans at detecting coherent motion |
title | Dogs are not better than humans at detecting coherent motion |
title_full | Dogs are not better than humans at detecting coherent motion |
title_fullStr | Dogs are not better than humans at detecting coherent motion |
title_full_unstemmed | Dogs are not better than humans at detecting coherent motion |
title_short | Dogs are not better than humans at detecting coherent motion |
title_sort | dogs are not better than humans at detecting coherent motion |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5595918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28900293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11864-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kanizsarorsolya dogsarenotbetterthanhumansatdetectingcoherentmotion AT mongillopaolo dogsarenotbetterthanhumansatdetectingcoherentmotion AT battagliniluca dogsarenotbetterthanhumansatdetectingcoherentmotion AT campanagianluca dogsarenotbetterthanhumansatdetectingcoherentmotion AT marinellilieta dogsarenotbetterthanhumansatdetectingcoherentmotion |