Cargando…

Dogs are not better than humans at detecting coherent motion

The ability to perceive motion is one of the main properties of the visual system. Sensitivity in detecting coherent motion has been thoroughly investigated in humans, where thresholds for motion detection are well below 10% of coherence, i.e. of the proportion of dots coherently moving in the same...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanizsár, Orsolya, Mongillo, Paolo, Battaglini, Luca, Campana, Gianluca, Marinelli, Lieta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5595918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28900293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11864-z
_version_ 1783263447268458496
author Kanizsár, Orsolya
Mongillo, Paolo
Battaglini, Luca
Campana, Gianluca
Marinelli, Lieta
author_facet Kanizsár, Orsolya
Mongillo, Paolo
Battaglini, Luca
Campana, Gianluca
Marinelli, Lieta
author_sort Kanizsár, Orsolya
collection PubMed
description The ability to perceive motion is one of the main properties of the visual system. Sensitivity in detecting coherent motion has been thoroughly investigated in humans, where thresholds for motion detection are well below 10% of coherence, i.e. of the proportion of dots coherently moving in the same direction, among a background of randomly moving dots. Equally low thresholds have been found in other species, including monkeys, cats and seals. Given the lack of data from the domestic dog, we tested 5 adult dogs on a conditioned discrimination task with random dot displays. In addition, five adult humans were tested in the same condition for comparative purposes. The mean threshold for motion detection in our dogs was 42% of coherence, while that of humans was as low as 5%. Therefore, dogs have a much higher threshold of coherent motion detection than humans, and possibly also than phylogenetically closer species that have been tested in similar experimental conditions. Various factors, including the relative role of global and local motion processing and experience with the experimental stimuli may have contributed to this result. Overall, this finding questions the general claim on dogs’ high performance in detecting motion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5595918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55959182017-09-15 Dogs are not better than humans at detecting coherent motion Kanizsár, Orsolya Mongillo, Paolo Battaglini, Luca Campana, Gianluca Marinelli, Lieta Sci Rep Article The ability to perceive motion is one of the main properties of the visual system. Sensitivity in detecting coherent motion has been thoroughly investigated in humans, where thresholds for motion detection are well below 10% of coherence, i.e. of the proportion of dots coherently moving in the same direction, among a background of randomly moving dots. Equally low thresholds have been found in other species, including monkeys, cats and seals. Given the lack of data from the domestic dog, we tested 5 adult dogs on a conditioned discrimination task with random dot displays. In addition, five adult humans were tested in the same condition for comparative purposes. The mean threshold for motion detection in our dogs was 42% of coherence, while that of humans was as low as 5%. Therefore, dogs have a much higher threshold of coherent motion detection than humans, and possibly also than phylogenetically closer species that have been tested in similar experimental conditions. Various factors, including the relative role of global and local motion processing and experience with the experimental stimuli may have contributed to this result. Overall, this finding questions the general claim on dogs’ high performance in detecting motion. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5595918/ /pubmed/28900293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11864-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Kanizsár, Orsolya
Mongillo, Paolo
Battaglini, Luca
Campana, Gianluca
Marinelli, Lieta
Dogs are not better than humans at detecting coherent motion
title Dogs are not better than humans at detecting coherent motion
title_full Dogs are not better than humans at detecting coherent motion
title_fullStr Dogs are not better than humans at detecting coherent motion
title_full_unstemmed Dogs are not better than humans at detecting coherent motion
title_short Dogs are not better than humans at detecting coherent motion
title_sort dogs are not better than humans at detecting coherent motion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5595918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28900293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11864-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kanizsarorsolya dogsarenotbetterthanhumansatdetectingcoherentmotion
AT mongillopaolo dogsarenotbetterthanhumansatdetectingcoherentmotion
AT battagliniluca dogsarenotbetterthanhumansatdetectingcoherentmotion
AT campanagianluca dogsarenotbetterthanhumansatdetectingcoherentmotion
AT marinellilieta dogsarenotbetterthanhumansatdetectingcoherentmotion