Cargando…
Which MR sequences should we use for the reliable detection and localization of bone marrow edema in spondyloarthritis?
OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic confidence in detecting and localizing areas of bone marrow edema in the sacroiliac joint of patients with suspected spondyloarthritis using a single-plane method and comparing it with multiplanar unenhanced and enhanced methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5596031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28593478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-017-0778-y |
_version_ | 1783263466901995520 |
---|---|
author | Giraudo, Chiara Weber, Michael Puchner, Antonia Grisar, Johannes Kainberger, Franz Schueller-Weidekamm, Claudia |
author_facet | Giraudo, Chiara Weber, Michael Puchner, Antonia Grisar, Johannes Kainberger, Franz Schueller-Weidekamm, Claudia |
author_sort | Giraudo, Chiara |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic confidence in detecting and localizing areas of bone marrow edema in the sacroiliac joint of patients with suspected spondyloarthritis using a single-plane method and comparing it with multiplanar unenhanced and enhanced methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with clinical suspicion of spondyloarthritis undergoing an MRI of the sacroiliac joint were included in this retrospective study. To assess sacroiliitis, three methods were applied: single-plane (i.e., para-coronal STIR alone), multiplanar unenhanced (i.e., para-coronal STIR and para-axial PD-fs), and multiplanar enhanced method (i.e., para-coronal and para-axial post-contrast T1-fs). Two 4-point scales were used to evaluate, respectively, the diagnostic confidence in detection and localization of bone marrow edema. The distribution of certain and uncertain rating according to signal intensity and size of the lesions was also calculated. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients met the inclusion criteria. Both multiplanar methods increased the diagnostic confidence in detection (p < 0.001) and localization (p < 0.001) of sacroiliitis; no significant difference occurred between the multiplanar unenhanced and enhanced methods (p = 0.405 and p = 1.00, respectively, for detection and localization). A statistically significant difference between the distributions of certain and uncertain rating for detection based on the size and signal intensity of each lesion emerged (p = 0.006 and p < 0.001, respectively), whereas no statistically significant difference occurred for the confidence of localization (p = 0.452 and p = 0.694, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The multiplanar methods increased the diagnostic confidence in detection and localization of sacroiliitis. The absence of a significant difference between the proposed unenhanced and enhanced methods suggests that contrast medium is not mandatory for the detection of sacroiliitis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5596031 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55960312017-09-26 Which MR sequences should we use for the reliable detection and localization of bone marrow edema in spondyloarthritis? Giraudo, Chiara Weber, Michael Puchner, Antonia Grisar, Johannes Kainberger, Franz Schueller-Weidekamm, Claudia Radiol Med Magnetic Resonance Imaging OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic confidence in detecting and localizing areas of bone marrow edema in the sacroiliac joint of patients with suspected spondyloarthritis using a single-plane method and comparing it with multiplanar unenhanced and enhanced methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with clinical suspicion of spondyloarthritis undergoing an MRI of the sacroiliac joint were included in this retrospective study. To assess sacroiliitis, three methods were applied: single-plane (i.e., para-coronal STIR alone), multiplanar unenhanced (i.e., para-coronal STIR and para-axial PD-fs), and multiplanar enhanced method (i.e., para-coronal and para-axial post-contrast T1-fs). Two 4-point scales were used to evaluate, respectively, the diagnostic confidence in detection and localization of bone marrow edema. The distribution of certain and uncertain rating according to signal intensity and size of the lesions was also calculated. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients met the inclusion criteria. Both multiplanar methods increased the diagnostic confidence in detection (p < 0.001) and localization (p < 0.001) of sacroiliitis; no significant difference occurred between the multiplanar unenhanced and enhanced methods (p = 0.405 and p = 1.00, respectively, for detection and localization). A statistically significant difference between the distributions of certain and uncertain rating for detection based on the size and signal intensity of each lesion emerged (p = 0.006 and p < 0.001, respectively), whereas no statistically significant difference occurred for the confidence of localization (p = 0.452 and p = 0.694, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The multiplanar methods increased the diagnostic confidence in detection and localization of sacroiliitis. The absence of a significant difference between the proposed unenhanced and enhanced methods suggests that contrast medium is not mandatory for the detection of sacroiliitis. Springer Milan 2017-06-07 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5596031/ /pubmed/28593478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-017-0778-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Magnetic Resonance Imaging Giraudo, Chiara Weber, Michael Puchner, Antonia Grisar, Johannes Kainberger, Franz Schueller-Weidekamm, Claudia Which MR sequences should we use for the reliable detection and localization of bone marrow edema in spondyloarthritis? |
title | Which MR sequences should we use for the reliable detection and localization of bone marrow edema in spondyloarthritis? |
title_full | Which MR sequences should we use for the reliable detection and localization of bone marrow edema in spondyloarthritis? |
title_fullStr | Which MR sequences should we use for the reliable detection and localization of bone marrow edema in spondyloarthritis? |
title_full_unstemmed | Which MR sequences should we use for the reliable detection and localization of bone marrow edema in spondyloarthritis? |
title_short | Which MR sequences should we use for the reliable detection and localization of bone marrow edema in spondyloarthritis? |
title_sort | which mr sequences should we use for the reliable detection and localization of bone marrow edema in spondyloarthritis? |
topic | Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5596031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28593478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-017-0778-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giraudochiara whichmrsequencesshouldweuseforthereliabledetectionandlocalizationofbonemarrowedemainspondyloarthritis AT webermichael whichmrsequencesshouldweuseforthereliabledetectionandlocalizationofbonemarrowedemainspondyloarthritis AT puchnerantonia whichmrsequencesshouldweuseforthereliabledetectionandlocalizationofbonemarrowedemainspondyloarthritis AT grisarjohannes whichmrsequencesshouldweuseforthereliabledetectionandlocalizationofbonemarrowedemainspondyloarthritis AT kainbergerfranz whichmrsequencesshouldweuseforthereliabledetectionandlocalizationofbonemarrowedemainspondyloarthritis AT schuellerweidekammclaudia whichmrsequencesshouldweuseforthereliabledetectionandlocalizationofbonemarrowedemainspondyloarthritis |