Cargando…

Which MR sequences should we use for the reliable detection and localization of bone marrow edema in spondyloarthritis?

OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic confidence in detecting and localizing areas of bone marrow edema in the sacroiliac joint of patients with suspected spondyloarthritis using a single-plane method and comparing it with multiplanar unenhanced and enhanced methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giraudo, Chiara, Weber, Michael, Puchner, Antonia, Grisar, Johannes, Kainberger, Franz, Schueller-Weidekamm, Claudia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5596031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28593478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-017-0778-y
_version_ 1783263466901995520
author Giraudo, Chiara
Weber, Michael
Puchner, Antonia
Grisar, Johannes
Kainberger, Franz
Schueller-Weidekamm, Claudia
author_facet Giraudo, Chiara
Weber, Michael
Puchner, Antonia
Grisar, Johannes
Kainberger, Franz
Schueller-Weidekamm, Claudia
author_sort Giraudo, Chiara
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic confidence in detecting and localizing areas of bone marrow edema in the sacroiliac joint of patients with suspected spondyloarthritis using a single-plane method and comparing it with multiplanar unenhanced and enhanced methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with clinical suspicion of spondyloarthritis undergoing an MRI of the sacroiliac joint were included in this retrospective study. To assess sacroiliitis, three methods were applied: single-plane (i.e., para-coronal STIR alone), multiplanar unenhanced (i.e., para-coronal STIR and para-axial PD-fs), and multiplanar enhanced method (i.e., para-coronal and para-axial post-contrast T1-fs). Two 4-point scales were used to evaluate, respectively, the diagnostic confidence in detection and localization of bone marrow edema. The distribution of certain and uncertain rating according to signal intensity and size of the lesions was also calculated. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients met the inclusion criteria. Both multiplanar methods increased the diagnostic confidence in detection (p < 0.001) and localization (p < 0.001) of sacroiliitis; no significant difference occurred between the multiplanar unenhanced and enhanced methods (p = 0.405 and p = 1.00, respectively, for detection and localization). A statistically significant difference between the distributions of certain and uncertain rating for detection based on the size and signal intensity of each lesion emerged (p = 0.006 and p < 0.001, respectively), whereas no statistically significant difference occurred for the confidence of localization (p = 0.452 and p = 0.694, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The multiplanar methods increased the diagnostic confidence in detection and localization of sacroiliitis. The absence of a significant difference between the proposed unenhanced and enhanced methods suggests that contrast medium is not mandatory for the detection of sacroiliitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5596031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55960312017-09-26 Which MR sequences should we use for the reliable detection and localization of bone marrow edema in spondyloarthritis? Giraudo, Chiara Weber, Michael Puchner, Antonia Grisar, Johannes Kainberger, Franz Schueller-Weidekamm, Claudia Radiol Med Magnetic Resonance Imaging OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic confidence in detecting and localizing areas of bone marrow edema in the sacroiliac joint of patients with suspected spondyloarthritis using a single-plane method and comparing it with multiplanar unenhanced and enhanced methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with clinical suspicion of spondyloarthritis undergoing an MRI of the sacroiliac joint were included in this retrospective study. To assess sacroiliitis, three methods were applied: single-plane (i.e., para-coronal STIR alone), multiplanar unenhanced (i.e., para-coronal STIR and para-axial PD-fs), and multiplanar enhanced method (i.e., para-coronal and para-axial post-contrast T1-fs). Two 4-point scales were used to evaluate, respectively, the diagnostic confidence in detection and localization of bone marrow edema. The distribution of certain and uncertain rating according to signal intensity and size of the lesions was also calculated. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients met the inclusion criteria. Both multiplanar methods increased the diagnostic confidence in detection (p < 0.001) and localization (p < 0.001) of sacroiliitis; no significant difference occurred between the multiplanar unenhanced and enhanced methods (p = 0.405 and p = 1.00, respectively, for detection and localization). A statistically significant difference between the distributions of certain and uncertain rating for detection based on the size and signal intensity of each lesion emerged (p = 0.006 and p < 0.001, respectively), whereas no statistically significant difference occurred for the confidence of localization (p = 0.452 and p = 0.694, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The multiplanar methods increased the diagnostic confidence in detection and localization of sacroiliitis. The absence of a significant difference between the proposed unenhanced and enhanced methods suggests that contrast medium is not mandatory for the detection of sacroiliitis. Springer Milan 2017-06-07 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5596031/ /pubmed/28593478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-017-0778-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Giraudo, Chiara
Weber, Michael
Puchner, Antonia
Grisar, Johannes
Kainberger, Franz
Schueller-Weidekamm, Claudia
Which MR sequences should we use for the reliable detection and localization of bone marrow edema in spondyloarthritis?
title Which MR sequences should we use for the reliable detection and localization of bone marrow edema in spondyloarthritis?
title_full Which MR sequences should we use for the reliable detection and localization of bone marrow edema in spondyloarthritis?
title_fullStr Which MR sequences should we use for the reliable detection and localization of bone marrow edema in spondyloarthritis?
title_full_unstemmed Which MR sequences should we use for the reliable detection and localization of bone marrow edema in spondyloarthritis?
title_short Which MR sequences should we use for the reliable detection and localization of bone marrow edema in spondyloarthritis?
title_sort which mr sequences should we use for the reliable detection and localization of bone marrow edema in spondyloarthritis?
topic Magnetic Resonance Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5596031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28593478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-017-0778-y
work_keys_str_mv AT giraudochiara whichmrsequencesshouldweuseforthereliabledetectionandlocalizationofbonemarrowedemainspondyloarthritis
AT webermichael whichmrsequencesshouldweuseforthereliabledetectionandlocalizationofbonemarrowedemainspondyloarthritis
AT puchnerantonia whichmrsequencesshouldweuseforthereliabledetectionandlocalizationofbonemarrowedemainspondyloarthritis
AT grisarjohannes whichmrsequencesshouldweuseforthereliabledetectionandlocalizationofbonemarrowedemainspondyloarthritis
AT kainbergerfranz whichmrsequencesshouldweuseforthereliabledetectionandlocalizationofbonemarrowedemainspondyloarthritis
AT schuellerweidekammclaudia whichmrsequencesshouldweuseforthereliabledetectionandlocalizationofbonemarrowedemainspondyloarthritis