Cargando…

Face and content validity of the virtual reality simulator ‘ScanTrainer®’

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography is a first-line imaging in the investigation of women’s irregular bleeding and other gynaecological pathologies, e.g. ovarian cysts and early pregnancy problems. However, teaching ultrasound, especially transvaginal scanning, remains a challenge for health professionals....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alsalamah, Amal, Campo, Rudi, Tanos, Vasilios, Grimbizis, Gregoris, Van Belle, Yves, Hood, Kerenza, Pugh, Neil, Amso, Nazar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5596038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28959176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10397-017-1020-6
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography is a first-line imaging in the investigation of women’s irregular bleeding and other gynaecological pathologies, e.g. ovarian cysts and early pregnancy problems. However, teaching ultrasound, especially transvaginal scanning, remains a challenge for health professionals. New technology such as simulation may potentially facilitate and expedite the process of learning ultrasound. Simulation may prove to be realistic, very close to real patient scanning experience for the sonographer and objectively able to assist the development of basic skills such as image manipulation, hand-eye coordination and examination technique. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the face and content validity of a virtual reality simulator (ScanTrainer®, MedaPhor plc, Cardiff, Wales, UK) as reflective of real transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) scanning. METHOD: A questionnaire with 14 simulator-related statements was distributed to a number of participants with differing levels of sonography experience in order to determine the level of agreement between the use of the simulator in training and real practice. RESULTS: There were 36 participants: novices (n = 25) and experts (n = 11) who rated the simulator. Median scores of face validity statements between experts and non-experts using a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) ratings ranged between 7.5 and 9.0 (p > 0.05) indicated a high level of agreement. Experts’ median scores of content validity statements ranged from 8.4 to 9.0. CONCLUSIONS: The findings confirm that the simulator has the feel and look of real-time scanning with high face validity. Similarly, its tutorial structures and learning steps confirm the content validity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s10397-017-1020-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.