Cargando…
A Validation Study of the Web Screening Questionnaire (WSQ) Compared With the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus (MINI-Plus)
BACKGROUND: There is a need for brief screening methods for psychiatric disorders in clinical practice. This study assesses the validity and accuracy of a brief self-report screening questionnaire, the Web Screening Questionnaire (WSQ), in detecting psychiatric disorders in a study group comprising...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5596296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851674 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mental.5453 |
_version_ | 1783263504896098304 |
---|---|
author | Meuldijk, Denise Giltay, Erik J Carlier, Ingrid VE van Vliet, Irene M van Hemert, Albert M Zitman, Frans G |
author_facet | Meuldijk, Denise Giltay, Erik J Carlier, Ingrid VE van Vliet, Irene M van Hemert, Albert M Zitman, Frans G |
author_sort | Meuldijk, Denise |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is a need for brief screening methods for psychiatric disorders in clinical practice. This study assesses the validity and accuracy of a brief self-report screening questionnaire, the Web Screening Questionnaire (WSQ), in detecting psychiatric disorders in a study group comprising the general population and psychiatric outpatients aged 18 years and older. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the WSQ is an adequate test to screen for the presence of depressive and anxiety disorders in clinical practice. METHODS: Participants were 1292 adults (1117 subjects from the general population and 175 psychiatric outpatients), aged 18 to 65 years. The discriminant characteristics of the WSQ were examined in relation to the (“gold standard”) Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus (MINI-Plus) disorders, by means of sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and positive and negative predictive values (PPVs, NPVs). RESULTS: The specificity of the WSQ to individually detect depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, and alcohol abuse or dependence ranged from 0.89 to 0.97 for most disorders, with the exception of post-traumatic stress disorder (0.52) and specific phobia (0.73). The sensitivity values ranged from 0.67 to 1.00, with the exception of depressive disorder (0.56) and alcohol abuse or dependence (0.56). Given the low prevalence of separate disorders in the general population sample, NPVs were extremely high across disorders (≥0.97), whereas PPVs were of poor strength (range 0.02-0.33). CONCLUSIONS: In this study group, the WSQ was a relatively good screening tool to identify individuals without a depressive or anxiety disorder, as it accurately identified those unlikely to suffer from these disorders (except for post-traumatic stress disorders and specific phobias). However, in case of a positive WSQ screening result, further diagnostic procedures are required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5596296 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55962962017-09-20 A Validation Study of the Web Screening Questionnaire (WSQ) Compared With the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus (MINI-Plus) Meuldijk, Denise Giltay, Erik J Carlier, Ingrid VE van Vliet, Irene M van Hemert, Albert M Zitman, Frans G JMIR Ment Health Original Paper BACKGROUND: There is a need for brief screening methods for psychiatric disorders in clinical practice. This study assesses the validity and accuracy of a brief self-report screening questionnaire, the Web Screening Questionnaire (WSQ), in detecting psychiatric disorders in a study group comprising the general population and psychiatric outpatients aged 18 years and older. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the WSQ is an adequate test to screen for the presence of depressive and anxiety disorders in clinical practice. METHODS: Participants were 1292 adults (1117 subjects from the general population and 175 psychiatric outpatients), aged 18 to 65 years. The discriminant characteristics of the WSQ were examined in relation to the (“gold standard”) Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus (MINI-Plus) disorders, by means of sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and positive and negative predictive values (PPVs, NPVs). RESULTS: The specificity of the WSQ to individually detect depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, and alcohol abuse or dependence ranged from 0.89 to 0.97 for most disorders, with the exception of post-traumatic stress disorder (0.52) and specific phobia (0.73). The sensitivity values ranged from 0.67 to 1.00, with the exception of depressive disorder (0.56) and alcohol abuse or dependence (0.56). Given the low prevalence of separate disorders in the general population sample, NPVs were extremely high across disorders (≥0.97), whereas PPVs were of poor strength (range 0.02-0.33). CONCLUSIONS: In this study group, the WSQ was a relatively good screening tool to identify individuals without a depressive or anxiety disorder, as it accurately identified those unlikely to suffer from these disorders (except for post-traumatic stress disorders and specific phobias). However, in case of a positive WSQ screening result, further diagnostic procedures are required. JMIR Publications 2017-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5596296/ /pubmed/28851674 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mental.5453 Text en ©Denise Meuldijk, Erik J Giltay, Ingrid VE Carlier, Irene M van Vliet, Albert M van Hemert, Frans G Zitman. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 29.08.2017. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Mental Health, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mental.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Meuldijk, Denise Giltay, Erik J Carlier, Ingrid VE van Vliet, Irene M van Hemert, Albert M Zitman, Frans G A Validation Study of the Web Screening Questionnaire (WSQ) Compared With the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus (MINI-Plus) |
title | A Validation Study of the Web Screening Questionnaire (WSQ) Compared With the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus (MINI-Plus) |
title_full | A Validation Study of the Web Screening Questionnaire (WSQ) Compared With the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus (MINI-Plus) |
title_fullStr | A Validation Study of the Web Screening Questionnaire (WSQ) Compared With the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus (MINI-Plus) |
title_full_unstemmed | A Validation Study of the Web Screening Questionnaire (WSQ) Compared With the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus (MINI-Plus) |
title_short | A Validation Study of the Web Screening Questionnaire (WSQ) Compared With the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus (MINI-Plus) |
title_sort | validation study of the web screening questionnaire (wsq) compared with the mini-international neuropsychiatric interview-plus (mini-plus) |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5596296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851674 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mental.5453 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meuldijkdenise avalidationstudyofthewebscreeningquestionnairewsqcomparedwiththeminiinternationalneuropsychiatricinterviewplusminiplus AT giltayerikj avalidationstudyofthewebscreeningquestionnairewsqcomparedwiththeminiinternationalneuropsychiatricinterviewplusminiplus AT carlieringridve avalidationstudyofthewebscreeningquestionnairewsqcomparedwiththeminiinternationalneuropsychiatricinterviewplusminiplus AT vanvlietirenem avalidationstudyofthewebscreeningquestionnairewsqcomparedwiththeminiinternationalneuropsychiatricinterviewplusminiplus AT vanhemertalbertm avalidationstudyofthewebscreeningquestionnairewsqcomparedwiththeminiinternationalneuropsychiatricinterviewplusminiplus AT zitmanfransg avalidationstudyofthewebscreeningquestionnairewsqcomparedwiththeminiinternationalneuropsychiatricinterviewplusminiplus AT meuldijkdenise validationstudyofthewebscreeningquestionnairewsqcomparedwiththeminiinternationalneuropsychiatricinterviewplusminiplus AT giltayerikj validationstudyofthewebscreeningquestionnairewsqcomparedwiththeminiinternationalneuropsychiatricinterviewplusminiplus AT carlieringridve validationstudyofthewebscreeningquestionnairewsqcomparedwiththeminiinternationalneuropsychiatricinterviewplusminiplus AT vanvlietirenem validationstudyofthewebscreeningquestionnairewsqcomparedwiththeminiinternationalneuropsychiatricinterviewplusminiplus AT vanhemertalbertm validationstudyofthewebscreeningquestionnairewsqcomparedwiththeminiinternationalneuropsychiatricinterviewplusminiplus AT zitmanfransg validationstudyofthewebscreeningquestionnairewsqcomparedwiththeminiinternationalneuropsychiatricinterviewplusminiplus |