Cargando…

What's New in SCLC? A Review

A few years ago the answer to the question in the title of this review would have been, “unfortunately not much” or even “nothing”, likely eliciting knowing nods of agreement from oncologists. For the last 3 decades, SCLC has been notorious for its lack of progress, as drug after drug, over 60 of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oronsky, Bryan, Reid, Tony R., Oronsky, Arnold, Carter, Corey A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Neoplasia Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5596356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28888101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2017.07.007
_version_ 1783263516131590144
author Oronsky, Bryan
Reid, Tony R.
Oronsky, Arnold
Carter, Corey A.
author_facet Oronsky, Bryan
Reid, Tony R.
Oronsky, Arnold
Carter, Corey A.
author_sort Oronsky, Bryan
collection PubMed
description A few years ago the answer to the question in the title of this review would have been, “unfortunately not much” or even “nothing”, likely eliciting knowing nods of agreement from oncologists. For the last 3 decades, SCLC has been notorious for its lack of progress, as drug after drug, over 60 of them, in fact, including inhibitors of VEGF, IGFR, mTOR, EGFR and HGF has failed and fallen by the wayside due to little or no impact on PFS or OS, while SCLC's cousin, NSCLC, has notched success after success with a spate of targeted treatment and immunotherapy regulatory approvals. However, a paradigm shift or, more appropriately, a ‘paradigm nudge’ is quietly underway in extensive stage SCLC with a series of agents that in early clinical trials have shown the potential to ‘lift the curse’ in SCLC, heretofore referred to as “a graveyard for drug development”. These agents, constituting the “best of what's new” in SCLC, and discussed in this review following a brief overview of the classification, epidemiology, prognosis and current treatment of SCLC, include checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, PARP inhibitors, epigenetic inhibitor/innate immune activator, and an inhibitor of RNA polymerase II. Compared to NSCLC, the therapeutic options are still limited but with one or more successes to build momentum and drive long-overdue R&D and clinical investment the hope is that the approval floodgates may finally open.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5596356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Neoplasia Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55963562017-09-20 What's New in SCLC? A Review Oronsky, Bryan Reid, Tony R. Oronsky, Arnold Carter, Corey A. Neoplasia Review article A few years ago the answer to the question in the title of this review would have been, “unfortunately not much” or even “nothing”, likely eliciting knowing nods of agreement from oncologists. For the last 3 decades, SCLC has been notorious for its lack of progress, as drug after drug, over 60 of them, in fact, including inhibitors of VEGF, IGFR, mTOR, EGFR and HGF has failed and fallen by the wayside due to little or no impact on PFS or OS, while SCLC's cousin, NSCLC, has notched success after success with a spate of targeted treatment and immunotherapy regulatory approvals. However, a paradigm shift or, more appropriately, a ‘paradigm nudge’ is quietly underway in extensive stage SCLC with a series of agents that in early clinical trials have shown the potential to ‘lift the curse’ in SCLC, heretofore referred to as “a graveyard for drug development”. These agents, constituting the “best of what's new” in SCLC, and discussed in this review following a brief overview of the classification, epidemiology, prognosis and current treatment of SCLC, include checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, PARP inhibitors, epigenetic inhibitor/innate immune activator, and an inhibitor of RNA polymerase II. Compared to NSCLC, the therapeutic options are still limited but with one or more successes to build momentum and drive long-overdue R&D and clinical investment the hope is that the approval floodgates may finally open. Neoplasia Press 2017-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5596356/ /pubmed/28888101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2017.07.007 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review article
Oronsky, Bryan
Reid, Tony R.
Oronsky, Arnold
Carter, Corey A.
What's New in SCLC? A Review
title What's New in SCLC? A Review
title_full What's New in SCLC? A Review
title_fullStr What's New in SCLC? A Review
title_full_unstemmed What's New in SCLC? A Review
title_short What's New in SCLC? A Review
title_sort what's new in sclc? a review
topic Review article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5596356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28888101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2017.07.007
work_keys_str_mv AT oronskybryan whatsnewinsclcareview
AT reidtonyr whatsnewinsclcareview
AT oronskyarnold whatsnewinsclcareview
AT cartercoreya whatsnewinsclcareview