Cargando…

A two-state comparative implementation of peer-support intervention to link veterans to health-related services after incarceration: a study protocol

BACKGROUND: Approximately 600,000 persons are released from prison annually in the United States. Relatively few receive sufficient re-entry services and are at risk for unemployment, homelessness, poverty, substance abuse relapse and recidivism. Persons leaving prison who have a mental illness and/...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simmons, Molly M., Fincke, Benjamin G., Drainoni, Mari-Lynn, Kim, Bo, Byrne, Tom, Smelson, David, Casey, Kevin, Ellison, Marsha L., Visher, Christy, Blue-Howells, Jessica, McInnes, D. Keith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5596492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28899394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2572-x
_version_ 1783263543041196032
author Simmons, Molly M.
Fincke, Benjamin G.
Drainoni, Mari-Lynn
Kim, Bo
Byrne, Tom
Smelson, David
Casey, Kevin
Ellison, Marsha L.
Visher, Christy
Blue-Howells, Jessica
McInnes, D. Keith
author_facet Simmons, Molly M.
Fincke, Benjamin G.
Drainoni, Mari-Lynn
Kim, Bo
Byrne, Tom
Smelson, David
Casey, Kevin
Ellison, Marsha L.
Visher, Christy
Blue-Howells, Jessica
McInnes, D. Keith
author_sort Simmons, Molly M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Approximately 600,000 persons are released from prison annually in the United States. Relatively few receive sufficient re-entry services and are at risk for unemployment, homelessness, poverty, substance abuse relapse and recidivism. Persons leaving prison who have a mental illness and/or a substance use disorder are particularly challenged. This project aims to create a peer mentor program to extend the reach and effectiveness of reentry services provided by the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA). We will implement a peer support for reentry veterans sequentially in two states. Our outcome measures are 1) fidelity of the intervention, 2) linkage to VA health care and, 3) continued engagement in health care. The aims for this project are as follows: (1) Conduct contextual analysis to identify VA and community reentry resources, and describe how reentry veterans use them. (2) Implement peer-support, in one state, to link reentry veterans to Veterans’ Health Administration (VHA) primary care, mental health, and SUD services. (3) Port the peer-support intervention to another, geographically, and contextually different state. DESIGN: This intervention involves a 2-state sequential implementation study (Massachusetts, followed by Pennsylvania) using a Facilitation Implementation strategy. We will conduct formative and summative analyses, including assessment of fidelity, and a matched comparison group to evaluate the intervention’s outcomes of veteran linkage and engagement in VHA health care (using health care utilization measures). The study proceeds in 3 phases. DISCUSSION: We anticipate that a peer support program will be effective at improving the reentry process for veterans, particularly in linking them to health, mental health, and SUD services and helping them to stay engaged in those services. It will fill a gap by providing veterans with access to a trusted individual, who understands their experience as a veteran and who has experienced justice involvement. The outputs from this project, including training materials, peer guidebooks, and implementation strategies can be adapted by other states and regions that wish to enhance services for veterans (or other populations) leaving incarceration. A larger cluster-randomized implementation-effectiveness study is planned. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This protocol is registered with clinicaltrials.gov on November 4, 2016 and was assigned the number NCT02964897. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2572-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5596492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55964922017-09-15 A two-state comparative implementation of peer-support intervention to link veterans to health-related services after incarceration: a study protocol Simmons, Molly M. Fincke, Benjamin G. Drainoni, Mari-Lynn Kim, Bo Byrne, Tom Smelson, David Casey, Kevin Ellison, Marsha L. Visher, Christy Blue-Howells, Jessica McInnes, D. Keith BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Approximately 600,000 persons are released from prison annually in the United States. Relatively few receive sufficient re-entry services and are at risk for unemployment, homelessness, poverty, substance abuse relapse and recidivism. Persons leaving prison who have a mental illness and/or a substance use disorder are particularly challenged. This project aims to create a peer mentor program to extend the reach and effectiveness of reentry services provided by the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA). We will implement a peer support for reentry veterans sequentially in two states. Our outcome measures are 1) fidelity of the intervention, 2) linkage to VA health care and, 3) continued engagement in health care. The aims for this project are as follows: (1) Conduct contextual analysis to identify VA and community reentry resources, and describe how reentry veterans use them. (2) Implement peer-support, in one state, to link reentry veterans to Veterans’ Health Administration (VHA) primary care, mental health, and SUD services. (3) Port the peer-support intervention to another, geographically, and contextually different state. DESIGN: This intervention involves a 2-state sequential implementation study (Massachusetts, followed by Pennsylvania) using a Facilitation Implementation strategy. We will conduct formative and summative analyses, including assessment of fidelity, and a matched comparison group to evaluate the intervention’s outcomes of veteran linkage and engagement in VHA health care (using health care utilization measures). The study proceeds in 3 phases. DISCUSSION: We anticipate that a peer support program will be effective at improving the reentry process for veterans, particularly in linking them to health, mental health, and SUD services and helping them to stay engaged in those services. It will fill a gap by providing veterans with access to a trusted individual, who understands their experience as a veteran and who has experienced justice involvement. The outputs from this project, including training materials, peer guidebooks, and implementation strategies can be adapted by other states and regions that wish to enhance services for veterans (or other populations) leaving incarceration. A larger cluster-randomized implementation-effectiveness study is planned. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This protocol is registered with clinicaltrials.gov on November 4, 2016 and was assigned the number NCT02964897. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2572-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5596492/ /pubmed/28899394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2572-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Simmons, Molly M.
Fincke, Benjamin G.
Drainoni, Mari-Lynn
Kim, Bo
Byrne, Tom
Smelson, David
Casey, Kevin
Ellison, Marsha L.
Visher, Christy
Blue-Howells, Jessica
McInnes, D. Keith
A two-state comparative implementation of peer-support intervention to link veterans to health-related services after incarceration: a study protocol
title A two-state comparative implementation of peer-support intervention to link veterans to health-related services after incarceration: a study protocol
title_full A two-state comparative implementation of peer-support intervention to link veterans to health-related services after incarceration: a study protocol
title_fullStr A two-state comparative implementation of peer-support intervention to link veterans to health-related services after incarceration: a study protocol
title_full_unstemmed A two-state comparative implementation of peer-support intervention to link veterans to health-related services after incarceration: a study protocol
title_short A two-state comparative implementation of peer-support intervention to link veterans to health-related services after incarceration: a study protocol
title_sort two-state comparative implementation of peer-support intervention to link veterans to health-related services after incarceration: a study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5596492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28899394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2572-x
work_keys_str_mv AT simmonsmollym atwostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol
AT finckebenjaming atwostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol
AT drainonimarilynn atwostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol
AT kimbo atwostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol
AT byrnetom atwostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol
AT smelsondavid atwostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol
AT caseykevin atwostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol
AT ellisonmarshal atwostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol
AT visherchristy atwostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol
AT bluehowellsjessica atwostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol
AT mcinnesdkeith atwostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol
AT simmonsmollym twostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol
AT finckebenjaming twostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol
AT drainonimarilynn twostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol
AT kimbo twostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol
AT byrnetom twostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol
AT smelsondavid twostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol
AT caseykevin twostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol
AT ellisonmarshal twostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol
AT visherchristy twostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol
AT bluehowellsjessica twostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol
AT mcinnesdkeith twostatecomparativeimplementationofpeersupportinterventiontolinkveteranstohealthrelatedservicesafterincarcerationastudyprotocol