Cargando…
Incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat: a randomized comparison of Glidescope with Macintosh laryngoscope
BACKGROUND: Postoperative sore throat (POST) is a common problem following endotracheal (ET) intubation during general anesthesia. The objective was to compare the incidence and severity of POST during routine intubation with Glidescope (GL) and Macintosh laryngoscope (MCL). METHODS: One hundred for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5596501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28899338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0421-4 |
_version_ | 1783263545153028096 |
---|---|
author | Aqil, Mansoor Khan, Mueen Ullah Mansoor, Saara Mansoor, Saad Khokhar, Rashid Saeed Narejo, Abdul Sattar |
author_facet | Aqil, Mansoor Khan, Mueen Ullah Mansoor, Saara Mansoor, Saad Khokhar, Rashid Saeed Narejo, Abdul Sattar |
author_sort | Aqil, Mansoor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Postoperative sore throat (POST) is a common problem following endotracheal (ET) intubation during general anesthesia. The objective was to compare the incidence and severity of POST during routine intubation with Glidescope (GL) and Macintosh laryngoscope (MCL). METHODS: One hundred forty adult patients ASA I and II with normal airway, scheduled to undergo elective surgery under GA requiring ET intubation were enrolled in this prospective randomized study and were randomly divided in two groups, GL and MCL. Incidence and severity of POST was evaluated at 0, 6, 12 and 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: At 0 h, the incidence of POST was more in MCL than GL (n = 41 v.s n = 22, P = 0.001), and also at 6 h after surgery (n = 37 v.s n = 23, P = 0.017). Severity of POST was more at 0, 6 and 12 h after surgery in MCL (P < 0.001, P = 0.001, P = 0.004 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of GL for ET tube placement results in reduction in the incidence and severity of POST compared to MCL. TRIAL REGISRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02848365. Retrospectively Registered (Date of registration: July, 2016). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5596501 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55965012017-09-15 Incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat: a randomized comparison of Glidescope with Macintosh laryngoscope Aqil, Mansoor Khan, Mueen Ullah Mansoor, Saara Mansoor, Saad Khokhar, Rashid Saeed Narejo, Abdul Sattar BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Postoperative sore throat (POST) is a common problem following endotracheal (ET) intubation during general anesthesia. The objective was to compare the incidence and severity of POST during routine intubation with Glidescope (GL) and Macintosh laryngoscope (MCL). METHODS: One hundred forty adult patients ASA I and II with normal airway, scheduled to undergo elective surgery under GA requiring ET intubation were enrolled in this prospective randomized study and were randomly divided in two groups, GL and MCL. Incidence and severity of POST was evaluated at 0, 6, 12 and 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: At 0 h, the incidence of POST was more in MCL than GL (n = 41 v.s n = 22, P = 0.001), and also at 6 h after surgery (n = 37 v.s n = 23, P = 0.017). Severity of POST was more at 0, 6 and 12 h after surgery in MCL (P < 0.001, P = 0.001, P = 0.004 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of GL for ET tube placement results in reduction in the incidence and severity of POST compared to MCL. TRIAL REGISRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02848365. Retrospectively Registered (Date of registration: July, 2016). BioMed Central 2017-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5596501/ /pubmed/28899338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0421-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Aqil, Mansoor Khan, Mueen Ullah Mansoor, Saara Mansoor, Saad Khokhar, Rashid Saeed Narejo, Abdul Sattar Incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat: a randomized comparison of Glidescope with Macintosh laryngoscope |
title | Incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat: a randomized comparison of Glidescope with Macintosh laryngoscope |
title_full | Incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat: a randomized comparison of Glidescope with Macintosh laryngoscope |
title_fullStr | Incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat: a randomized comparison of Glidescope with Macintosh laryngoscope |
title_full_unstemmed | Incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat: a randomized comparison of Glidescope with Macintosh laryngoscope |
title_short | Incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat: a randomized comparison of Glidescope with Macintosh laryngoscope |
title_sort | incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat: a randomized comparison of glidescope with macintosh laryngoscope |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5596501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28899338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0421-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aqilmansoor incidenceandseverityofpostoperativesorethroatarandomizedcomparisonofglidescopewithmacintoshlaryngoscope AT khanmueenullah incidenceandseverityofpostoperativesorethroatarandomizedcomparisonofglidescopewithmacintoshlaryngoscope AT mansoorsaara incidenceandseverityofpostoperativesorethroatarandomizedcomparisonofglidescopewithmacintoshlaryngoscope AT mansoorsaad incidenceandseverityofpostoperativesorethroatarandomizedcomparisonofglidescopewithmacintoshlaryngoscope AT khokharrashidsaeed incidenceandseverityofpostoperativesorethroatarandomizedcomparisonofglidescopewithmacintoshlaryngoscope AT narejoabdulsattar incidenceandseverityofpostoperativesorethroatarandomizedcomparisonofglidescopewithmacintoshlaryngoscope |