Cargando…

Evaluation of two flap designs on the mandibular second molar after third molar extractions

BACKGROUND: The extraction of third molars is associated with some clinical outcomes and periodontal problems. It is imperative to note that the type of incision used in the surgery for the removal of the impacted third molar is critical. The design of the flap influences the healing of the surgical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alqahtani, Nabeeh A, Khaleelahmed, S, Desai, Farheen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5596690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932049
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_75_17
_version_ 1783263580755329024
author Alqahtani, Nabeeh A
Khaleelahmed, S
Desai, Farheen
author_facet Alqahtani, Nabeeh A
Khaleelahmed, S
Desai, Farheen
author_sort Alqahtani, Nabeeh A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The extraction of third molars is associated with some clinical outcomes and periodontal problems. It is imperative to note that the type of incision used in the surgery for the removal of the impacted third molar is critical. The design of the flap influences the healing of the surgically created defect and damage to the distal periodontal area of the adjacent second molar. However, till date, there have been conflicting reports on the influence of different flap designs used for the surgical removal of impacted third molars. AIM: The present study aimed to comparatively evaluate the clinical outcomes and periodontal status of the adjacent second molar, when two different flap designs, namely, the envelope and the modified triangular flap designs were used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty female patients with bilateral impacted third molars completed the study with envelope flap on one side and modified triangular flap design on the other side of the mandible for third molar removal. Clinical parameters including pain, dehiscence and swelling were assessed postoperatively and periodontal probing depth (PPD) on the distal aspect of adjacent second molar were assessed both pre- and post-operatively. RESULTS: The results were assessed on 1, 3 and 8 days for pain using visual analog scale. The subjective perception of swelling was evaluated on 3, 7 and 15 days postoperatively in a similar manner. The results of the periodontal parameters were evaluated both preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively, with cautious exploration using a University of North Carolina (UNC)-15 periodontal probe. The statistically significant results for swelling and PPD were noted for the two flap groups using the Chi-square test (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The study revealed that the modified triangular flap had lesser postoperative PPDs and dehiscence. The envelope flap was better when swelling was analyzed. The pain scores, though slightly higher for the modified triangular flap group, were not statistically significant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5596690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55966902017-09-20 Evaluation of two flap designs on the mandibular second molar after third molar extractions Alqahtani, Nabeeh A Khaleelahmed, S Desai, Farheen J Oral Maxillofac Pathol Original Article BACKGROUND: The extraction of third molars is associated with some clinical outcomes and periodontal problems. It is imperative to note that the type of incision used in the surgery for the removal of the impacted third molar is critical. The design of the flap influences the healing of the surgically created defect and damage to the distal periodontal area of the adjacent second molar. However, till date, there have been conflicting reports on the influence of different flap designs used for the surgical removal of impacted third molars. AIM: The present study aimed to comparatively evaluate the clinical outcomes and periodontal status of the adjacent second molar, when two different flap designs, namely, the envelope and the modified triangular flap designs were used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty female patients with bilateral impacted third molars completed the study with envelope flap on one side and modified triangular flap design on the other side of the mandible for third molar removal. Clinical parameters including pain, dehiscence and swelling were assessed postoperatively and periodontal probing depth (PPD) on the distal aspect of adjacent second molar were assessed both pre- and post-operatively. RESULTS: The results were assessed on 1, 3 and 8 days for pain using visual analog scale. The subjective perception of swelling was evaluated on 3, 7 and 15 days postoperatively in a similar manner. The results of the periodontal parameters were evaluated both preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively, with cautious exploration using a University of North Carolina (UNC)-15 periodontal probe. The statistically significant results for swelling and PPD were noted for the two flap groups using the Chi-square test (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The study revealed that the modified triangular flap had lesser postoperative PPDs and dehiscence. The envelope flap was better when swelling was analyzed. The pain scores, though slightly higher for the modified triangular flap group, were not statistically significant. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5596690/ /pubmed/28932049 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_75_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Alqahtani, Nabeeh A
Khaleelahmed, S
Desai, Farheen
Evaluation of two flap designs on the mandibular second molar after third molar extractions
title Evaluation of two flap designs on the mandibular second molar after third molar extractions
title_full Evaluation of two flap designs on the mandibular second molar after third molar extractions
title_fullStr Evaluation of two flap designs on the mandibular second molar after third molar extractions
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of two flap designs on the mandibular second molar after third molar extractions
title_short Evaluation of two flap designs on the mandibular second molar after third molar extractions
title_sort evaluation of two flap designs on the mandibular second molar after third molar extractions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5596690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932049
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_75_17
work_keys_str_mv AT alqahtaninabeeha evaluationoftwoflapdesignsonthemandibularsecondmolarafterthirdmolarextractions
AT khaleelahmeds evaluationoftwoflapdesignsonthemandibularsecondmolarafterthirdmolarextractions
AT desaifarheen evaluationoftwoflapdesignsonthemandibularsecondmolarafterthirdmolarextractions