Cargando…
Close observation versus upfront treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma: are the exception points worth the risk?
INTRODUCTION: To assess the outcomes of immediate LDT versus observation strategies for T1 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with respect to progression beyond Milan and survival. METHOD: T1 HCCs were retrospectively reviewed from a multidisciplinary tumour board database between September 2007 and May...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5596865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28944072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2017-000157 |
_version_ | 1783263618064711680 |
---|---|
author | Tholey, Danielle M Hornung, Ben Enestvedt, Charles K Chen, Yiyi Naugler, Willscott S Farsad, Khashayar Nabavizadeh, Nima Schlansky, Barry Ahn, Joseph Jou, Janice H |
author_facet | Tholey, Danielle M Hornung, Ben Enestvedt, Charles K Chen, Yiyi Naugler, Willscott S Farsad, Khashayar Nabavizadeh, Nima Schlansky, Barry Ahn, Joseph Jou, Janice H |
author_sort | Tholey, Danielle M |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: To assess the outcomes of immediate LDT versus observation strategies for T1 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with respect to progression beyond Milan and survival. METHOD: T1 HCCs were retrospectively reviewed from a multidisciplinary tumour board database between September 2007 and May 2015. In the observation group, T1 lesions were observed until the tumour grew to meet T2 criteria (=2 cm). The treatment group consisted of T1 lesions treated at diagnosis with liver directed therapy (LDT). Kaplan-Meier plots were constructed for tumour progression beyond Milan and overall survival. RESULTS: 87 patients (observation n=56; LDT n=31) were included in the study. A total of 22% (n=19) of patients progressed beyond Milan with no difference in progression between treatment and observation groups (19% vs 23%, p=0.49). Median time to progression beyond Milan was 16 months. Overall transplantation rate was 22% (observation group n=16; treatment group n=3, p=0.04). Median survival was 55 months with LDT versus 36 months in the observation group (p=0.22). In patients who progressed to T2 (n=60), longer time to T2 progression was a predictor of improved survival (HR=0.94, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.99, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate LDT of T1 lesions was not associated with increased risk of progression beyond Milan criteria when compared with an observation approach. Longer time to T2 progression was associated with increased survival and may be a surrogate for favourable tumour biology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5596865 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55968652017-09-22 Close observation versus upfront treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma: are the exception points worth the risk? Tholey, Danielle M Hornung, Ben Enestvedt, Charles K Chen, Yiyi Naugler, Willscott S Farsad, Khashayar Nabavizadeh, Nima Schlansky, Barry Ahn, Joseph Jou, Janice H BMJ Open Gastroenterol Hepatology INTRODUCTION: To assess the outcomes of immediate LDT versus observation strategies for T1 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with respect to progression beyond Milan and survival. METHOD: T1 HCCs were retrospectively reviewed from a multidisciplinary tumour board database between September 2007 and May 2015. In the observation group, T1 lesions were observed until the tumour grew to meet T2 criteria (=2 cm). The treatment group consisted of T1 lesions treated at diagnosis with liver directed therapy (LDT). Kaplan-Meier plots were constructed for tumour progression beyond Milan and overall survival. RESULTS: 87 patients (observation n=56; LDT n=31) were included in the study. A total of 22% (n=19) of patients progressed beyond Milan with no difference in progression between treatment and observation groups (19% vs 23%, p=0.49). Median time to progression beyond Milan was 16 months. Overall transplantation rate was 22% (observation group n=16; treatment group n=3, p=0.04). Median survival was 55 months with LDT versus 36 months in the observation group (p=0.22). In patients who progressed to T2 (n=60), longer time to T2 progression was a predictor of improved survival (HR=0.94, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.99, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate LDT of T1 lesions was not associated with increased risk of progression beyond Milan criteria when compared with an observation approach. Longer time to T2 progression was associated with increased survival and may be a surrogate for favourable tumour biology. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5596865/ /pubmed/28944072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2017-000157 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Hepatology Tholey, Danielle M Hornung, Ben Enestvedt, Charles K Chen, Yiyi Naugler, Willscott S Farsad, Khashayar Nabavizadeh, Nima Schlansky, Barry Ahn, Joseph Jou, Janice H Close observation versus upfront treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma: are the exception points worth the risk? |
title | Close observation versus upfront treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma: are the exception points worth the risk? |
title_full | Close observation versus upfront treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma: are the exception points worth the risk? |
title_fullStr | Close observation versus upfront treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma: are the exception points worth the risk? |
title_full_unstemmed | Close observation versus upfront treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma: are the exception points worth the risk? |
title_short | Close observation versus upfront treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma: are the exception points worth the risk? |
title_sort | close observation versus upfront treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma: are the exception points worth the risk? |
topic | Hepatology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5596865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28944072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2017-000157 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tholeydaniellem closeobservationversusupfronttreatmentinhepatocellularcarcinomaaretheexceptionpointsworththerisk AT hornungben closeobservationversusupfronttreatmentinhepatocellularcarcinomaaretheexceptionpointsworththerisk AT enestvedtcharlesk closeobservationversusupfronttreatmentinhepatocellularcarcinomaaretheexceptionpointsworththerisk AT chenyiyi closeobservationversusupfronttreatmentinhepatocellularcarcinomaaretheexceptionpointsworththerisk AT nauglerwillscotts closeobservationversusupfronttreatmentinhepatocellularcarcinomaaretheexceptionpointsworththerisk AT farsadkhashayar closeobservationversusupfronttreatmentinhepatocellularcarcinomaaretheexceptionpointsworththerisk AT nabavizadehnima closeobservationversusupfronttreatmentinhepatocellularcarcinomaaretheexceptionpointsworththerisk AT schlanskybarry closeobservationversusupfronttreatmentinhepatocellularcarcinomaaretheexceptionpointsworththerisk AT ahnjoseph closeobservationversusupfronttreatmentinhepatocellularcarcinomaaretheexceptionpointsworththerisk AT joujaniceh closeobservationversusupfronttreatmentinhepatocellularcarcinomaaretheexceptionpointsworththerisk |