Cargando…
Overstatements in abstract conclusions claiming effectiveness of interventions in psychiatry: A meta-epidemiological investigation
OBJECTIVE: Abstracts of scientific reports are sometimes criticized for exaggerating significant results when compared to the corresponding full texts. Such abstracts can mislead the readers. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of overstatements in abstract conclusions in psychiatry trials. METH...
Autores principales: | Shinohara, Kiyomi, Suganuma, Aya M., Imai, Hissei, Takeshima, Nozomi, Hayasaka, Yu, Furukawa, Toshi A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5597227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28902885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184786 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Overstatements in abstract conclusions claiming effectiveness of interventions in psychiatry: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation
por: Suganuma, Aya M, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Influence of overstated abstract conclusions on clinicians: a web-based randomised controlled trial
por: Shinohara, Kiyomi, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Physician characteristics associated with proper assessment of overstated conclusions in research abstracts: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
por: Tsujimoto, Yasushi, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of first-generation and second-generation antidepressants in the acute treatment of major depression: protocol for a network meta-analysis
por: Furukawa, Toshi A, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Unguided Computer-Assisted Self-Help Interventions Without Human Contact in Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
por: Imai, Hissei, et al.
Publicado: (2022)