Cargando…
Intrafascial versus interfascial nerve sparing in radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
The present study aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the intrafascial and interfascial nerve sparing (ITR-NS and ITE-NS) radical prostatectomy. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for eligible studies. Meta-analysis with random-effects model was...
Autores principales: | Weng, Hong, Zeng, Xian-Tao, Li, Sheng, Meng, Xiang-Yu, Shi, Ming-Jun, He, Da-Lin, Wang, Xing-Huan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5597634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28904361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11878-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Prospective comparison of one year follow-up outcomes for the open complete intrafascial retropubic versus interfascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy
por: Khoder, Wael Y, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Comparison of intrafascial and non-intrafascial radical prostatectomy for low risk localized prostate cancer
por: Zhao, Zhankui, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Dorsal vein complex preserving technique for intrafascial nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
por: Hoshi, Akio, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy improves patients’ postoperative continence recovery and erectile function: A pooled analysis based on available literatures
por: Wang, Xiao, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Oncological safety of intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy compared with conventional process: a pooled review and meta-regression analysis based on available studies
por: Wang, Xiao, et al.
Publicado: (2019)