Cargando…
Consent Processes for Mobile App Mediated Research: Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Since the launch of ResearchKit on the iOS platform in March 2015 and ResearchStack on the Android platform in June 2016, many academic and commercial institutions around the world have adapted these frameworks to develop mobile app-based research studies. These studies cover a wide vari...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5597795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855147 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7014 |
_version_ | 1783263774172512256 |
---|---|
author | Moore, Sarah Tassé, Anne-Marie Thorogood, Adrian Winship, Ingrid Zawati, Ma'n Doerr, Megan |
author_facet | Moore, Sarah Tassé, Anne-Marie Thorogood, Adrian Winship, Ingrid Zawati, Ma'n Doerr, Megan |
author_sort | Moore, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Since the launch of ResearchKit on the iOS platform in March 2015 and ResearchStack on the Android platform in June 2016, many academic and commercial institutions around the world have adapted these frameworks to develop mobile app-based research studies. These studies cover a wide variety of subject areas including melanoma, cardiomyopathy, and autism. Additionally, these app-based studies target a variety of participant populations, including children and pregnant women. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to document the variety of self-administered remote informed consent processes used in app-based research studies available between May and September 2016. Remote consent is defined as any consenting process with zero in-person steps, when a participant is able to join a study without ever seeing a member of the research team. This type of review has not been previously conducted. The research community would benefit from a rigorous interrogation of the types of consent taken as part of the seismic shift to entirely mobile meditated research studies. METHODS: This review examines both the process of information giving and specific content shared, with special attention to data privacy, aggregation, and sharing. RESULTS: Consistency across some elements of the app-based consent processes was found; for example, informing participants about how data will be curated from the phone. Variations in other elements were identified; for example, where specific information is shared and the level of detail disclosed. Additionally, several novel elements present in eConsent not typically seen in traditional consent for research were highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: This review advocates the importance of participant informedness in a novel and largely unregulated research setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5597795 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55977952017-09-20 Consent Processes for Mobile App Mediated Research: Systematic Review Moore, Sarah Tassé, Anne-Marie Thorogood, Adrian Winship, Ingrid Zawati, Ma'n Doerr, Megan JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: Since the launch of ResearchKit on the iOS platform in March 2015 and ResearchStack on the Android platform in June 2016, many academic and commercial institutions around the world have adapted these frameworks to develop mobile app-based research studies. These studies cover a wide variety of subject areas including melanoma, cardiomyopathy, and autism. Additionally, these app-based studies target a variety of participant populations, including children and pregnant women. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to document the variety of self-administered remote informed consent processes used in app-based research studies available between May and September 2016. Remote consent is defined as any consenting process with zero in-person steps, when a participant is able to join a study without ever seeing a member of the research team. This type of review has not been previously conducted. The research community would benefit from a rigorous interrogation of the types of consent taken as part of the seismic shift to entirely mobile meditated research studies. METHODS: This review examines both the process of information giving and specific content shared, with special attention to data privacy, aggregation, and sharing. RESULTS: Consistency across some elements of the app-based consent processes was found; for example, informing participants about how data will be curated from the phone. Variations in other elements were identified; for example, where specific information is shared and the level of detail disclosed. Additionally, several novel elements present in eConsent not typically seen in traditional consent for research were highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: This review advocates the importance of participant informedness in a novel and largely unregulated research setting. JMIR Publications 2017-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5597795/ /pubmed/28855147 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7014 Text en ©Sarah Moore, Anne-Marie Tassé, Adrian Thorogood, Ingrid Winship, Ma'n Zawati, Megan Doerr. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 30.08.2017. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Moore, Sarah Tassé, Anne-Marie Thorogood, Adrian Winship, Ingrid Zawati, Ma'n Doerr, Megan Consent Processes for Mobile App Mediated Research: Systematic Review |
title | Consent Processes for Mobile App Mediated Research: Systematic Review |
title_full | Consent Processes for Mobile App Mediated Research: Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Consent Processes for Mobile App Mediated Research: Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Consent Processes for Mobile App Mediated Research: Systematic Review |
title_short | Consent Processes for Mobile App Mediated Research: Systematic Review |
title_sort | consent processes for mobile app mediated research: systematic review |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5597795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855147 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mooresarah consentprocessesformobileappmediatedresearchsystematicreview AT tasseannemarie consentprocessesformobileappmediatedresearchsystematicreview AT thorogoodadrian consentprocessesformobileappmediatedresearchsystematicreview AT winshipingrid consentprocessesformobileappmediatedresearchsystematicreview AT zawatiman consentprocessesformobileappmediatedresearchsystematicreview AT doerrmegan consentprocessesformobileappmediatedresearchsystematicreview |