Cargando…

Barriers to reporting of adverse drugs reactions: a cross sectional study among community pharmacists in United Kingdom

BACKGROUND: Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) are a major public health problem. Prompt reporting of suspected ADRs is fundamental in the post-marketing surveillance of medicines and helps in ensuring medicine safety. However, fewer ADRs are reported in general and in particular by community pharmacists...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheema, Ejaz, Haseeb, Abdul, Khan, Tahir M., Sutcliffe, Paul, Singer, Donald R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5597805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28943977
http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2017.03.931
_version_ 1783263776675463168
author Cheema, Ejaz
Haseeb, Abdul
Khan, Tahir M.
Sutcliffe, Paul
Singer, Donald R.
author_facet Cheema, Ejaz
Haseeb, Abdul
Khan, Tahir M.
Sutcliffe, Paul
Singer, Donald R.
author_sort Cheema, Ejaz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) are a major public health problem. Prompt reporting of suspected ADRs is fundamental in the post-marketing surveillance of medicines and helps in ensuring medicine safety. However, fewer ADRs are reported in general and in particular by community pharmacists. There is limited knowledge about the factors which are preventing community pharmacists in the UK from reporting an ADR. OBJECTIVES: To identify the barriers to ADR reporting among community pharmacists practicing in the UK. METHODS: A cross sectional study using a 25-items questionnaire (both online and paper based) including 10 barriers to ADR reporting was conducted from 1st April 2012 to September 2012. Community pharmacists practicing in the West Midlands, UK, were approached for the participation in this study. Chi-Square and regression were applied to identify covariates for the barriers to ADR reporting. A significant value of 0.05 was assigned for analysis. RESULTS: Of the 230 invited community pharmacists, 138 pharmacists responded (response rate 60%). The median age of respondents was 31 years. All pharmacists reported that they would report both serious and mild ADRs from drugs with black triangle among children as well as adults. About 95% (n=131) of the pharmacists were familiar with the paper based ADR reporting system. Store-based pharmacists were more likely to be more confident about which ADRs to report [0.680, 95% Confidence Interval 0.43-3.59]. Lack of time 46.4% (n=64), and pharmacists perception that ADR is not serious enough to report (65.2%; n=90) were identified as barriers to ADR reporting. Majority 63.0% (n=87) of the pharmacists identified training and information about what to report and access to Information Technology (IT) (For example access to internet connection) 61.6% (n=85) as facilitators to ADR reporting process. CONCLUSION: Lack of time and ADRs considered not serious enough by pharmacists to report were barriers to ADR reporting. Further training and education about the types of ADRs to be reported can help to improve the reporting of ADRs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5597805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55978052017-09-22 Barriers to reporting of adverse drugs reactions: a cross sectional study among community pharmacists in United Kingdom Cheema, Ejaz Haseeb, Abdul Khan, Tahir M. Sutcliffe, Paul Singer, Donald R. Pharm Pract (Granada) Original Research BACKGROUND: Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) are a major public health problem. Prompt reporting of suspected ADRs is fundamental in the post-marketing surveillance of medicines and helps in ensuring medicine safety. However, fewer ADRs are reported in general and in particular by community pharmacists. There is limited knowledge about the factors which are preventing community pharmacists in the UK from reporting an ADR. OBJECTIVES: To identify the barriers to ADR reporting among community pharmacists practicing in the UK. METHODS: A cross sectional study using a 25-items questionnaire (both online and paper based) including 10 barriers to ADR reporting was conducted from 1st April 2012 to September 2012. Community pharmacists practicing in the West Midlands, UK, were approached for the participation in this study. Chi-Square and regression were applied to identify covariates for the barriers to ADR reporting. A significant value of 0.05 was assigned for analysis. RESULTS: Of the 230 invited community pharmacists, 138 pharmacists responded (response rate 60%). The median age of respondents was 31 years. All pharmacists reported that they would report both serious and mild ADRs from drugs with black triangle among children as well as adults. About 95% (n=131) of the pharmacists were familiar with the paper based ADR reporting system. Store-based pharmacists were more likely to be more confident about which ADRs to report [0.680, 95% Confidence Interval 0.43-3.59]. Lack of time 46.4% (n=64), and pharmacists perception that ADR is not serious enough to report (65.2%; n=90) were identified as barriers to ADR reporting. Majority 63.0% (n=87) of the pharmacists identified training and information about what to report and access to Information Technology (IT) (For example access to internet connection) 61.6% (n=85) as facilitators to ADR reporting process. CONCLUSION: Lack of time and ADRs considered not serious enough by pharmacists to report were barriers to ADR reporting. Further training and education about the types of ADRs to be reported can help to improve the reporting of ADRs. Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2017 2017-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5597805/ /pubmed/28943977 http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2017.03.931 Text en Copyright: © Pharmacy Practice http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cheema, Ejaz
Haseeb, Abdul
Khan, Tahir M.
Sutcliffe, Paul
Singer, Donald R.
Barriers to reporting of adverse drugs reactions: a cross sectional study among community pharmacists in United Kingdom
title Barriers to reporting of adverse drugs reactions: a cross sectional study among community pharmacists in United Kingdom
title_full Barriers to reporting of adverse drugs reactions: a cross sectional study among community pharmacists in United Kingdom
title_fullStr Barriers to reporting of adverse drugs reactions: a cross sectional study among community pharmacists in United Kingdom
title_full_unstemmed Barriers to reporting of adverse drugs reactions: a cross sectional study among community pharmacists in United Kingdom
title_short Barriers to reporting of adverse drugs reactions: a cross sectional study among community pharmacists in United Kingdom
title_sort barriers to reporting of adverse drugs reactions: a cross sectional study among community pharmacists in united kingdom
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5597805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28943977
http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2017.03.931
work_keys_str_mv AT cheemaejaz barrierstoreportingofadversedrugsreactionsacrosssectionalstudyamongcommunitypharmacistsinunitedkingdom
AT haseebabdul barrierstoreportingofadversedrugsreactionsacrosssectionalstudyamongcommunitypharmacistsinunitedkingdom
AT khantahirm barrierstoreportingofadversedrugsreactionsacrosssectionalstudyamongcommunitypharmacistsinunitedkingdom
AT sutcliffepaul barrierstoreportingofadversedrugsreactionsacrosssectionalstudyamongcommunitypharmacistsinunitedkingdom
AT singerdonaldr barrierstoreportingofadversedrugsreactionsacrosssectionalstudyamongcommunitypharmacistsinunitedkingdom