Cargando…

A restatement of the natural science evidence base concerning the health effects of low-level ionizing radiation

Exposure to ionizing radiation is ubiquitous, and it is well established that moderate and high doses cause ill-health and can be lethal. The health effects of low doses or low dose-rates of ionizing radiation are not so clear. This paper describes a project which sets out to summarize, as a restate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McLean, Angela R., Adlen, Ella K., Cardis, Elisabeth, Elliott, Alex, Goodhead, Dudley T., Harms-Ringdahl, Mats, Hendry, Jolyon H., Hoskin, Peter, Jeggo, Penny A., Mackay, David J. C., Muirhead, Colin R., Shepherd, John, Shore, Roy E., Thomas, Geraldine A., Wakeford, Richard, Godfray, H. Charles J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5597830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28904138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1070
_version_ 1783263780518494208
author McLean, Angela R.
Adlen, Ella K.
Cardis, Elisabeth
Elliott, Alex
Goodhead, Dudley T.
Harms-Ringdahl, Mats
Hendry, Jolyon H.
Hoskin, Peter
Jeggo, Penny A.
Mackay, David J. C.
Muirhead, Colin R.
Shepherd, John
Shore, Roy E.
Thomas, Geraldine A.
Wakeford, Richard
Godfray, H. Charles J.
author_facet McLean, Angela R.
Adlen, Ella K.
Cardis, Elisabeth
Elliott, Alex
Goodhead, Dudley T.
Harms-Ringdahl, Mats
Hendry, Jolyon H.
Hoskin, Peter
Jeggo, Penny A.
Mackay, David J. C.
Muirhead, Colin R.
Shepherd, John
Shore, Roy E.
Thomas, Geraldine A.
Wakeford, Richard
Godfray, H. Charles J.
author_sort McLean, Angela R.
collection PubMed
description Exposure to ionizing radiation is ubiquitous, and it is well established that moderate and high doses cause ill-health and can be lethal. The health effects of low doses or low dose-rates of ionizing radiation are not so clear. This paper describes a project which sets out to summarize, as a restatement, the natural science evidence base concerning the human health effects of exposure to low-level ionizing radiation. A novel feature, compared to other reviews, is that a series of statements are listed and categorized according to the nature and strength of the evidence that underpins them. The purpose of this restatement is to provide a concise entrée into this vibrant field, pointing the interested reader deeper into the literature when more detail is needed. It is not our purpose to reach conclusions on whether the legal limits on radiation exposures are too high, too low or just right. Our aim is to provide an introduction so that non-specialist individuals in this area (be they policy-makers, disputers of policy, health professionals or students) have a straightforward place to start. The summary restatement of the evidence and an extensively annotated bibliography are provided as appendices in the electronic supplementary material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5597830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55978302017-09-18 A restatement of the natural science evidence base concerning the health effects of low-level ionizing radiation McLean, Angela R. Adlen, Ella K. Cardis, Elisabeth Elliott, Alex Goodhead, Dudley T. Harms-Ringdahl, Mats Hendry, Jolyon H. Hoskin, Peter Jeggo, Penny A. Mackay, David J. C. Muirhead, Colin R. Shepherd, John Shore, Roy E. Thomas, Geraldine A. Wakeford, Richard Godfray, H. Charles J. Proc Biol Sci Development and Physiology Exposure to ionizing radiation is ubiquitous, and it is well established that moderate and high doses cause ill-health and can be lethal. The health effects of low doses or low dose-rates of ionizing radiation are not so clear. This paper describes a project which sets out to summarize, as a restatement, the natural science evidence base concerning the human health effects of exposure to low-level ionizing radiation. A novel feature, compared to other reviews, is that a series of statements are listed and categorized according to the nature and strength of the evidence that underpins them. The purpose of this restatement is to provide a concise entrée into this vibrant field, pointing the interested reader deeper into the literature when more detail is needed. It is not our purpose to reach conclusions on whether the legal limits on radiation exposures are too high, too low or just right. Our aim is to provide an introduction so that non-specialist individuals in this area (be they policy-makers, disputers of policy, health professionals or students) have a straightforward place to start. The summary restatement of the evidence and an extensively annotated bibliography are provided as appendices in the electronic supplementary material. The Royal Society 2017-09-13 2017-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5597830/ /pubmed/28904138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1070 Text en © 2017 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Development and Physiology
McLean, Angela R.
Adlen, Ella K.
Cardis, Elisabeth
Elliott, Alex
Goodhead, Dudley T.
Harms-Ringdahl, Mats
Hendry, Jolyon H.
Hoskin, Peter
Jeggo, Penny A.
Mackay, David J. C.
Muirhead, Colin R.
Shepherd, John
Shore, Roy E.
Thomas, Geraldine A.
Wakeford, Richard
Godfray, H. Charles J.
A restatement of the natural science evidence base concerning the health effects of low-level ionizing radiation
title A restatement of the natural science evidence base concerning the health effects of low-level ionizing radiation
title_full A restatement of the natural science evidence base concerning the health effects of low-level ionizing radiation
title_fullStr A restatement of the natural science evidence base concerning the health effects of low-level ionizing radiation
title_full_unstemmed A restatement of the natural science evidence base concerning the health effects of low-level ionizing radiation
title_short A restatement of the natural science evidence base concerning the health effects of low-level ionizing radiation
title_sort restatement of the natural science evidence base concerning the health effects of low-level ionizing radiation
topic Development and Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5597830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28904138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1070
work_keys_str_mv AT mcleanangelar arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT adlenellak arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT cardiselisabeth arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT elliottalex arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT goodheaddudleyt arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT harmsringdahlmats arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT hendryjolyonh arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT hoskinpeter arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT jeggopennya arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT mackaydavidjc arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT muirheadcolinr arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT shepherdjohn arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT shoreroye arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT thomasgeraldinea arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT wakefordrichard arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT godfrayhcharlesj arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT mcleanangelar restatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT adlenellak restatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT cardiselisabeth restatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT elliottalex restatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT goodheaddudleyt restatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT harmsringdahlmats restatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT hendryjolyonh restatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT hoskinpeter restatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT jeggopennya restatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT mackaydavidjc restatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT muirheadcolinr restatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT shepherdjohn restatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT shoreroye restatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT thomasgeraldinea restatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT wakefordrichard restatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation
AT godfrayhcharlesj restatementofthenaturalscienceevidencebaseconcerningthehealtheffectsoflowlevelionizingradiation