Cargando…
High intensity training in obesity: a Meta‐analysis
INTRODUCTION: High Intensity training (HIT) is a time‐effective alternative to traditional exercise programs in adults with obesity, but the superiority in terms of improving cardiopulmonary fitness and weight loss has not been demonstrated. OBJECTIVE: to determine the effectiveness of HIT on cardio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5598019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29071102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.109 |
_version_ | 1783263815393083392 |
---|---|
author | Türk, Y. Theel, W. Kasteleyn, M. J. Franssen, F. M. E. Hiemstra, P. S. Rudolphus, A. Taube, C. Braunstahl, G. J. |
author_facet | Türk, Y. Theel, W. Kasteleyn, M. J. Franssen, F. M. E. Hiemstra, P. S. Rudolphus, A. Taube, C. Braunstahl, G. J. |
author_sort | Türk, Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: High Intensity training (HIT) is a time‐effective alternative to traditional exercise programs in adults with obesity, but the superiority in terms of improving cardiopulmonary fitness and weight loss has not been demonstrated. OBJECTIVE: to determine the effectiveness of HIT on cardiopulmonary fitness and body composition in adults with obesity compared to traditional (high volume continuous) exercise. METHODS: A systematic search of the main health science databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials comparing HIT with traditional forms of exercise in people with obesity. Eighteen studies were included in the meta‐analysis. The (unstandardized) mean difference of each outcome parameters was calculated and pooled with the random effects model. RESULTS: HIT resulted in greater improvement of cardiopulmonary fitness (VO(2max)) (MD 1.83, 95% CI 0.70, 2.96, p<0.005; I(2)=31%) and a greater reduction of %body fat (MD ‐1.69, 95% CI ‐3.10, ‐0.27, p=0.02, I(2)=30%) compared to traditional exercise. Overall effect for BMI was not different between HIT and traditional exercise. CONCLUSION: Training at high intensity is superior to improve cardiopulmonary fitness and to reduce %body fat in adults with obesity compared to traditional exercise. Future studies are needed to design specific HIT programs for the obese with regard to optimal effect and long‐term adherence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5598019 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55980192017-10-25 High intensity training in obesity: a Meta‐analysis Türk, Y. Theel, W. Kasteleyn, M. J. Franssen, F. M. E. Hiemstra, P. S. Rudolphus, A. Taube, C. Braunstahl, G. J. Obes Sci Pract Review INTRODUCTION: High Intensity training (HIT) is a time‐effective alternative to traditional exercise programs in adults with obesity, but the superiority in terms of improving cardiopulmonary fitness and weight loss has not been demonstrated. OBJECTIVE: to determine the effectiveness of HIT on cardiopulmonary fitness and body composition in adults with obesity compared to traditional (high volume continuous) exercise. METHODS: A systematic search of the main health science databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials comparing HIT with traditional forms of exercise in people with obesity. Eighteen studies were included in the meta‐analysis. The (unstandardized) mean difference of each outcome parameters was calculated and pooled with the random effects model. RESULTS: HIT resulted in greater improvement of cardiopulmonary fitness (VO(2max)) (MD 1.83, 95% CI 0.70, 2.96, p<0.005; I(2)=31%) and a greater reduction of %body fat (MD ‐1.69, 95% CI ‐3.10, ‐0.27, p=0.02, I(2)=30%) compared to traditional exercise. Overall effect for BMI was not different between HIT and traditional exercise. CONCLUSION: Training at high intensity is superior to improve cardiopulmonary fitness and to reduce %body fat in adults with obesity compared to traditional exercise. Future studies are needed to design specific HIT programs for the obese with regard to optimal effect and long‐term adherence. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5598019/ /pubmed/29071102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.109 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Obesity Science & Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, World Obesity and The Obesity Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Review Türk, Y. Theel, W. Kasteleyn, M. J. Franssen, F. M. E. Hiemstra, P. S. Rudolphus, A. Taube, C. Braunstahl, G. J. High intensity training in obesity: a Meta‐analysis |
title | High intensity training in obesity: a Meta‐analysis |
title_full | High intensity training in obesity: a Meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | High intensity training in obesity: a Meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | High intensity training in obesity: a Meta‐analysis |
title_short | High intensity training in obesity: a Meta‐analysis |
title_sort | high intensity training in obesity: a meta‐analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5598019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29071102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.109 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT turky highintensitytraininginobesityametaanalysis AT theelw highintensitytraininginobesityametaanalysis AT kasteleynmj highintensitytraininginobesityametaanalysis AT franssenfme highintensitytraininginobesityametaanalysis AT hiemstraps highintensitytraininginobesityametaanalysis AT rudolphusa highintensitytraininginobesityametaanalysis AT taubec highintensitytraininginobesityametaanalysis AT braunstahlgj highintensitytraininginobesityametaanalysis |