Cargando…

High intensity training in obesity: a Meta‐analysis

INTRODUCTION: High Intensity training (HIT) is a time‐effective alternative to traditional exercise programs in adults with obesity, but the superiority in terms of improving cardiopulmonary fitness and weight loss has not been demonstrated. OBJECTIVE: to determine the effectiveness of HIT on cardio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Türk, Y., Theel, W., Kasteleyn, M. J., Franssen, F. M. E., Hiemstra, P. S., Rudolphus, A., Taube, C., Braunstahl, G. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5598019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29071102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.109
_version_ 1783263815393083392
author Türk, Y.
Theel, W.
Kasteleyn, M. J.
Franssen, F. M. E.
Hiemstra, P. S.
Rudolphus, A.
Taube, C.
Braunstahl, G. J.
author_facet Türk, Y.
Theel, W.
Kasteleyn, M. J.
Franssen, F. M. E.
Hiemstra, P. S.
Rudolphus, A.
Taube, C.
Braunstahl, G. J.
author_sort Türk, Y.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: High Intensity training (HIT) is a time‐effective alternative to traditional exercise programs in adults with obesity, but the superiority in terms of improving cardiopulmonary fitness and weight loss has not been demonstrated. OBJECTIVE: to determine the effectiveness of HIT on cardiopulmonary fitness and body composition in adults with obesity compared to traditional (high volume continuous) exercise. METHODS: A systematic search of the main health science databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials comparing HIT with traditional forms of exercise in people with obesity. Eighteen studies were included in the meta‐analysis. The (unstandardized) mean difference of each outcome parameters was calculated and pooled with the random effects model. RESULTS: HIT resulted in greater improvement of cardiopulmonary fitness (VO(2max)) (MD 1.83, 95% CI 0.70, 2.96, p<0.005; I(2)=31%) and a greater reduction of %body fat (MD ‐1.69, 95% CI ‐3.10, ‐0.27, p=0.02, I(2)=30%) compared to traditional exercise. Overall effect for BMI was not different between HIT and traditional exercise. CONCLUSION: Training at high intensity is superior to improve cardiopulmonary fitness and to reduce %body fat in adults with obesity compared to traditional exercise. Future studies are needed to design specific HIT programs for the obese with regard to optimal effect and long‐term adherence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5598019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55980192017-10-25 High intensity training in obesity: a Meta‐analysis Türk, Y. Theel, W. Kasteleyn, M. J. Franssen, F. M. E. Hiemstra, P. S. Rudolphus, A. Taube, C. Braunstahl, G. J. Obes Sci Pract Review INTRODUCTION: High Intensity training (HIT) is a time‐effective alternative to traditional exercise programs in adults with obesity, but the superiority in terms of improving cardiopulmonary fitness and weight loss has not been demonstrated. OBJECTIVE: to determine the effectiveness of HIT on cardiopulmonary fitness and body composition in adults with obesity compared to traditional (high volume continuous) exercise. METHODS: A systematic search of the main health science databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials comparing HIT with traditional forms of exercise in people with obesity. Eighteen studies were included in the meta‐analysis. The (unstandardized) mean difference of each outcome parameters was calculated and pooled with the random effects model. RESULTS: HIT resulted in greater improvement of cardiopulmonary fitness (VO(2max)) (MD 1.83, 95% CI 0.70, 2.96, p<0.005; I(2)=31%) and a greater reduction of %body fat (MD ‐1.69, 95% CI ‐3.10, ‐0.27, p=0.02, I(2)=30%) compared to traditional exercise. Overall effect for BMI was not different between HIT and traditional exercise. CONCLUSION: Training at high intensity is superior to improve cardiopulmonary fitness and to reduce %body fat in adults with obesity compared to traditional exercise. Future studies are needed to design specific HIT programs for the obese with regard to optimal effect and long‐term adherence. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5598019/ /pubmed/29071102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.109 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Obesity Science & Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, World Obesity and The Obesity Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review
Türk, Y.
Theel, W.
Kasteleyn, M. J.
Franssen, F. M. E.
Hiemstra, P. S.
Rudolphus, A.
Taube, C.
Braunstahl, G. J.
High intensity training in obesity: a Meta‐analysis
title High intensity training in obesity: a Meta‐analysis
title_full High intensity training in obesity: a Meta‐analysis
title_fullStr High intensity training in obesity: a Meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed High intensity training in obesity: a Meta‐analysis
title_short High intensity training in obesity: a Meta‐analysis
title_sort high intensity training in obesity: a meta‐analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5598019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29071102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.109
work_keys_str_mv AT turky highintensitytraininginobesityametaanalysis
AT theelw highintensitytraininginobesityametaanalysis
AT kasteleynmj highintensitytraininginobesityametaanalysis
AT franssenfme highintensitytraininginobesityametaanalysis
AT hiemstraps highintensitytraininginobesityametaanalysis
AT rudolphusa highintensitytraininginobesityametaanalysis
AT taubec highintensitytraininginobesityametaanalysis
AT braunstahlgj highintensitytraininginobesityametaanalysis