Cargando…

Comparison of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry methods to evaluate the effect of Heterodera schachtii inoculation on sugar beets

BACKGROUND: Phenotyping technologies are expected to provide predictive power for a range of applications in plant and crop sciences. Here, we use the disease pressure of Beet Cyst Nematodes (BCN) on sugar beet as an illustrative example to test the specific capabilities of different methods. Strong...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joalland, Samuel, Screpanti, Claudio, Liebisch, Frank, Varella, Hubert Vincent, Gaume, Alain, Walter, Achim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5598052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28924448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0223-1
_version_ 1783263823311929344
author Joalland, Samuel
Screpanti, Claudio
Liebisch, Frank
Varella, Hubert Vincent
Gaume, Alain
Walter, Achim
author_facet Joalland, Samuel
Screpanti, Claudio
Liebisch, Frank
Varella, Hubert Vincent
Gaume, Alain
Walter, Achim
author_sort Joalland, Samuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Phenotyping technologies are expected to provide predictive power for a range of applications in plant and crop sciences. Here, we use the disease pressure of Beet Cyst Nematodes (BCN) on sugar beet as an illustrative example to test the specific capabilities of different methods. Strong links between the above and belowground parts of sugar beet plants have made BCN suitable targets for use of non-destructive phenotyping methods. We compared the ability of visible light imaging, thermography and spectrometry to evaluate the effect of BCN on the growth of sugar beet plants. RESULTS: Two microplot experiments were sown with the nematode susceptible cultivar Aimanta and the nematode tolerant cultivar BlueFox under semi-field conditions. Visible imaging, thermal imaging and spectrometry were carried out on BCN infested and non-infested plants at different times during the plant development. Effects of a chemical nematicide were also evaluated using the three phenotyping methods. Leaf and beet biomass were measured at harvest. For both susceptible and tolerant cultivar, canopy area extracted from visible images was the earliest nematode stress indicator. Using such canopy area parameter, delay in leaf growth as well as benefit from a chemical nematicide could be detected already 15 days after sowing. Spectrometry was suitable to identify the stress even when the canopy reached full coverage. Thermography could only detect stress on the susceptible cultivar. Spectral Vegetation Indices related to canopy cover (NDVI and MCARI2) and chlorophyll content (CHLG) were correlated with the final yield (R = 0.69 on average for the susceptible cultivar) and the final nematode population in the soil (R = 0.78 on average for the susceptible cultivar). CONCLUSION: In this paper we compare the use of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry over two cultivars and 2 years under outdoor conditions. The three different techniques have their specific strengths in identifying BCN symptoms according to the type of cultivars and the growth stages of the sugar beet plants. Early detection of nematicide benefit and high yield predictability using visible imaging and spectrometry suggests promising applications for agricultural research and precision agriculture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5598052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55980522017-09-18 Comparison of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry methods to evaluate the effect of Heterodera schachtii inoculation on sugar beets Joalland, Samuel Screpanti, Claudio Liebisch, Frank Varella, Hubert Vincent Gaume, Alain Walter, Achim Plant Methods Research BACKGROUND: Phenotyping technologies are expected to provide predictive power for a range of applications in plant and crop sciences. Here, we use the disease pressure of Beet Cyst Nematodes (BCN) on sugar beet as an illustrative example to test the specific capabilities of different methods. Strong links between the above and belowground parts of sugar beet plants have made BCN suitable targets for use of non-destructive phenotyping methods. We compared the ability of visible light imaging, thermography and spectrometry to evaluate the effect of BCN on the growth of sugar beet plants. RESULTS: Two microplot experiments were sown with the nematode susceptible cultivar Aimanta and the nematode tolerant cultivar BlueFox under semi-field conditions. Visible imaging, thermal imaging and spectrometry were carried out on BCN infested and non-infested plants at different times during the plant development. Effects of a chemical nematicide were also evaluated using the three phenotyping methods. Leaf and beet biomass were measured at harvest. For both susceptible and tolerant cultivar, canopy area extracted from visible images was the earliest nematode stress indicator. Using such canopy area parameter, delay in leaf growth as well as benefit from a chemical nematicide could be detected already 15 days after sowing. Spectrometry was suitable to identify the stress even when the canopy reached full coverage. Thermography could only detect stress on the susceptible cultivar. Spectral Vegetation Indices related to canopy cover (NDVI and MCARI2) and chlorophyll content (CHLG) were correlated with the final yield (R = 0.69 on average for the susceptible cultivar) and the final nematode population in the soil (R = 0.78 on average for the susceptible cultivar). CONCLUSION: In this paper we compare the use of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry over two cultivars and 2 years under outdoor conditions. The three different techniques have their specific strengths in identifying BCN symptoms according to the type of cultivars and the growth stages of the sugar beet plants. Early detection of nematicide benefit and high yield predictability using visible imaging and spectrometry suggests promising applications for agricultural research and precision agriculture. BioMed Central 2017-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5598052/ /pubmed/28924448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0223-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Joalland, Samuel
Screpanti, Claudio
Liebisch, Frank
Varella, Hubert Vincent
Gaume, Alain
Walter, Achim
Comparison of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry methods to evaluate the effect of Heterodera schachtii inoculation on sugar beets
title Comparison of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry methods to evaluate the effect of Heterodera schachtii inoculation on sugar beets
title_full Comparison of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry methods to evaluate the effect of Heterodera schachtii inoculation on sugar beets
title_fullStr Comparison of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry methods to evaluate the effect of Heterodera schachtii inoculation on sugar beets
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry methods to evaluate the effect of Heterodera schachtii inoculation on sugar beets
title_short Comparison of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry methods to evaluate the effect of Heterodera schachtii inoculation on sugar beets
title_sort comparison of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry methods to evaluate the effect of heterodera schachtii inoculation on sugar beets
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5598052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28924448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0223-1
work_keys_str_mv AT joallandsamuel comparisonofvisibleimagingthermographyandspectrometrymethodstoevaluatetheeffectofheteroderaschachtiiinoculationonsugarbeets
AT screpanticlaudio comparisonofvisibleimagingthermographyandspectrometrymethodstoevaluatetheeffectofheteroderaschachtiiinoculationonsugarbeets
AT liebischfrank comparisonofvisibleimagingthermographyandspectrometrymethodstoevaluatetheeffectofheteroderaschachtiiinoculationonsugarbeets
AT varellahubertvincent comparisonofvisibleimagingthermographyandspectrometrymethodstoevaluatetheeffectofheteroderaschachtiiinoculationonsugarbeets
AT gaumealain comparisonofvisibleimagingthermographyandspectrometrymethodstoevaluatetheeffectofheteroderaschachtiiinoculationonsugarbeets
AT walterachim comparisonofvisibleimagingthermographyandspectrometrymethodstoevaluatetheeffectofheteroderaschachtiiinoculationonsugarbeets