Cargando…
Comparison of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry methods to evaluate the effect of Heterodera schachtii inoculation on sugar beets
BACKGROUND: Phenotyping technologies are expected to provide predictive power for a range of applications in plant and crop sciences. Here, we use the disease pressure of Beet Cyst Nematodes (BCN) on sugar beet as an illustrative example to test the specific capabilities of different methods. Strong...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5598052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28924448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0223-1 |
_version_ | 1783263823311929344 |
---|---|
author | Joalland, Samuel Screpanti, Claudio Liebisch, Frank Varella, Hubert Vincent Gaume, Alain Walter, Achim |
author_facet | Joalland, Samuel Screpanti, Claudio Liebisch, Frank Varella, Hubert Vincent Gaume, Alain Walter, Achim |
author_sort | Joalland, Samuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Phenotyping technologies are expected to provide predictive power for a range of applications in plant and crop sciences. Here, we use the disease pressure of Beet Cyst Nematodes (BCN) on sugar beet as an illustrative example to test the specific capabilities of different methods. Strong links between the above and belowground parts of sugar beet plants have made BCN suitable targets for use of non-destructive phenotyping methods. We compared the ability of visible light imaging, thermography and spectrometry to evaluate the effect of BCN on the growth of sugar beet plants. RESULTS: Two microplot experiments were sown with the nematode susceptible cultivar Aimanta and the nematode tolerant cultivar BlueFox under semi-field conditions. Visible imaging, thermal imaging and spectrometry were carried out on BCN infested and non-infested plants at different times during the plant development. Effects of a chemical nematicide were also evaluated using the three phenotyping methods. Leaf and beet biomass were measured at harvest. For both susceptible and tolerant cultivar, canopy area extracted from visible images was the earliest nematode stress indicator. Using such canopy area parameter, delay in leaf growth as well as benefit from a chemical nematicide could be detected already 15 days after sowing. Spectrometry was suitable to identify the stress even when the canopy reached full coverage. Thermography could only detect stress on the susceptible cultivar. Spectral Vegetation Indices related to canopy cover (NDVI and MCARI2) and chlorophyll content (CHLG) were correlated with the final yield (R = 0.69 on average for the susceptible cultivar) and the final nematode population in the soil (R = 0.78 on average for the susceptible cultivar). CONCLUSION: In this paper we compare the use of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry over two cultivars and 2 years under outdoor conditions. The three different techniques have their specific strengths in identifying BCN symptoms according to the type of cultivars and the growth stages of the sugar beet plants. Early detection of nematicide benefit and high yield predictability using visible imaging and spectrometry suggests promising applications for agricultural research and precision agriculture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5598052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55980522017-09-18 Comparison of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry methods to evaluate the effect of Heterodera schachtii inoculation on sugar beets Joalland, Samuel Screpanti, Claudio Liebisch, Frank Varella, Hubert Vincent Gaume, Alain Walter, Achim Plant Methods Research BACKGROUND: Phenotyping technologies are expected to provide predictive power for a range of applications in plant and crop sciences. Here, we use the disease pressure of Beet Cyst Nematodes (BCN) on sugar beet as an illustrative example to test the specific capabilities of different methods. Strong links between the above and belowground parts of sugar beet plants have made BCN suitable targets for use of non-destructive phenotyping methods. We compared the ability of visible light imaging, thermography and spectrometry to evaluate the effect of BCN on the growth of sugar beet plants. RESULTS: Two microplot experiments were sown with the nematode susceptible cultivar Aimanta and the nematode tolerant cultivar BlueFox under semi-field conditions. Visible imaging, thermal imaging and spectrometry were carried out on BCN infested and non-infested plants at different times during the plant development. Effects of a chemical nematicide were also evaluated using the three phenotyping methods. Leaf and beet biomass were measured at harvest. For both susceptible and tolerant cultivar, canopy area extracted from visible images was the earliest nematode stress indicator. Using such canopy area parameter, delay in leaf growth as well as benefit from a chemical nematicide could be detected already 15 days after sowing. Spectrometry was suitable to identify the stress even when the canopy reached full coverage. Thermography could only detect stress on the susceptible cultivar. Spectral Vegetation Indices related to canopy cover (NDVI and MCARI2) and chlorophyll content (CHLG) were correlated with the final yield (R = 0.69 on average for the susceptible cultivar) and the final nematode population in the soil (R = 0.78 on average for the susceptible cultivar). CONCLUSION: In this paper we compare the use of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry over two cultivars and 2 years under outdoor conditions. The three different techniques have their specific strengths in identifying BCN symptoms according to the type of cultivars and the growth stages of the sugar beet plants. Early detection of nematicide benefit and high yield predictability using visible imaging and spectrometry suggests promising applications for agricultural research and precision agriculture. BioMed Central 2017-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5598052/ /pubmed/28924448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0223-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Joalland, Samuel Screpanti, Claudio Liebisch, Frank Varella, Hubert Vincent Gaume, Alain Walter, Achim Comparison of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry methods to evaluate the effect of Heterodera schachtii inoculation on sugar beets |
title | Comparison of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry methods to evaluate the effect of Heterodera schachtii inoculation on sugar beets |
title_full | Comparison of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry methods to evaluate the effect of Heterodera schachtii inoculation on sugar beets |
title_fullStr | Comparison of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry methods to evaluate the effect of Heterodera schachtii inoculation on sugar beets |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry methods to evaluate the effect of Heterodera schachtii inoculation on sugar beets |
title_short | Comparison of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry methods to evaluate the effect of Heterodera schachtii inoculation on sugar beets |
title_sort | comparison of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry methods to evaluate the effect of heterodera schachtii inoculation on sugar beets |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5598052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28924448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0223-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joallandsamuel comparisonofvisibleimagingthermographyandspectrometrymethodstoevaluatetheeffectofheteroderaschachtiiinoculationonsugarbeets AT screpanticlaudio comparisonofvisibleimagingthermographyandspectrometrymethodstoevaluatetheeffectofheteroderaschachtiiinoculationonsugarbeets AT liebischfrank comparisonofvisibleimagingthermographyandspectrometrymethodstoevaluatetheeffectofheteroderaschachtiiinoculationonsugarbeets AT varellahubertvincent comparisonofvisibleimagingthermographyandspectrometrymethodstoevaluatetheeffectofheteroderaschachtiiinoculationonsugarbeets AT gaumealain comparisonofvisibleimagingthermographyandspectrometrymethodstoevaluatetheeffectofheteroderaschachtiiinoculationonsugarbeets AT walterachim comparisonofvisibleimagingthermographyandspectrometrymethodstoevaluatetheeffectofheteroderaschachtiiinoculationonsugarbeets |